Re: Oracle Vm 3.4

+1 to this question. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rodrigo Jorge wrote: > Hello there, > > The oracle vm 3.4 doesn't supported on Cloudstack 4.11 ? > > Rodrigo > -- Thanks & Regards Prakash Sharma

Re: Oracle Vm 3.4

The current ovm3 hypervisor plugin may require some fixes to support the latest version. Get Outlook for Android From: Rodrigo Jorge Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 7:09:01 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Oracle Vm 3.4 Hello

Re: vSphere/vCenter 6.7 Support

Hi Carlos, May be future cloudstack release(s) would include support for 6.7. -Suresh On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Carlos Cesario wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > Thanks by info. > Is It possible add support to version 6.7 once this os the last VMware > version? > > Regards > Carlos > > De:

Oracle Vm 3.4

Hello there, The oracle vm 3.4 doesn't supported on Cloudstack 4.11 ? Rodrigo

RE: Cloudstack 4.11.1 RC1. SystemVM Config Issue with Xenserver 7.1. Detected as xen-domU.

Hi Paul Thanks for your reply, it appears the SystemVM's are running as HVM - so those options are missing. Although is that the intended deployment since this commit? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2465#issuecomment-370807868 Cheers James Richards Senior Systems Engineer D:

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Yes, all basic. I read a Shapeblue doc that recommended splitting traffic across multiple NICs even in basic networking mode so that is what I am trying to do. With single NIC you do not get the NFS storage message. I have the entire management server logs for both scenarios after I pulled

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Ah so, it is not an advanced setup; even when you use multiple NICs. Can you confirm that the message ""Agent investigation was requested on host, but host does not support investigation because it has no NFS storage. Skipping investigation." does not appear when you use a single NIC? Can you

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

It is all basic networking at the moment for all the setups. If you want me to I can setup a single NIC solution again and run any commands you need me to do. FYI when I setup single NIC I use the guided installtion option in the UI rather than manual setup which I do for the multiple NIC

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Ok, so that explains the log message. This is looking like a bug to me. It seems that in Zone wide the host state (when disconnected) is not being properly identified due to this NFS thing, and as a consequency it has a side effect in VM HA. We would need some inputs from guys that have advanced

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

zone wide. From: Rafael Weingärtner Sent: 07 June 2018 10:04 To: users Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs What type of storage are you using? Zone wide? Or cluster "wide" storage? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jon Marshall wrote:

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

What type of storage are you using? Zone wide? Or cluster "wide" storage? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jon Marshall wrote: > Rafael > > > Here is the output as requested - > > > > mysql> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null; >

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Rafael Here is the output as requested - mysql> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null;

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Dag Am not an SQL expert by any means but does this not show hosts are in cluster 1 - mysql> select name, cluster_id from cloud.host; +-++ | name| cluster_id | +-++ | dcp-cscn1.local | 1 | | v-2-VM |

Re: How exactly does CloudStack stop a VM?

Hi Zhang, Cloudstack would usually trigger a hypervisor level shutdown cmd for the guest OS to stop the the guest VM. In case of XenServer, a XAPI command for shutdown VM is sent from Cloudstack. Attempted for hard shutdown if force flag is set, else a clean shutdown and if the shutdown