Thanks - that's resolved the issue. This wasn't mentioned in the
upgrade guide, and I didn't run into it initially!
Regards,
Richard
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 18:12, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> Have you migrated to dynamic roles yet? The old commands.properties file has
> been deprecated.
> Assuming
Have you migrated to dynamic roles yet? The old commands.properties file has
been deprecated.
Assuming that you haven't customised your commands.properties file, you should
run the migration script using the 'install default roles' switch ( -D ).
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.2.0/ad
Hello,
I have a problem with my cloud-management web UI. It just stopped accepting
connections and gives apache error.
Is theer anyway I could get some help from you?
Ricky
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:23 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: cannot st
Hi Everyone,
Well it is official now, for the next year I'll be the Chairman/VP of the
Apache CloudStack Project. To dive straight into the clichés; for me it is
an honour and a privilege to hold this position.
There are so many awesome people doing awesome things in this CloudStack
communit
This was an issue with redundancy. I just set redundant flag to 0 and
restarted the network with cleanup flag set to true and it worked.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:03 PM Fariborz Navidan
wrote:
>
> 2019-03-29 14:28:05,448 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:ctx-e7a148f3)
2019-03-29 14:28:05,448 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-e7a148f3) (logid:953545b2) Zone 1 is ready to launch
secondary storage VM
2019-03-29 14:28:05,482 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-a238f5ea) (logid:174bb141) Zone 1 is ready to launch
cons
Investigate the stacktrace in logs, share all related when you'll find.
пт, 29 мар. 2019 г., 10:19 Fariborz Navidan :
> Not for me! I think my CS DB is inconsistent somehow! I cannot figure out
> which tables should I manipulate to fix it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev >
>
well... if you can restore DB that would be great - if not
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 15:19, Fariborz Navidan
wrote:
> Not for me! I think my CS DB is inconsistent somehow! I cannot figure out
> which tables should I manipulate to fix it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev >
>
Not for me! I think my CS DB is inconsistent somehow! I cannot figure out
which tables should I manipulate to fix it.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> VR deletion is OK for Basic Zone in 4.11.2, work normally, VR is created
> automatically.
>
> пт, 29 мар. 2019 г., 10:04
VR deletion is OK for Basic Zone in 4.11.2, work normally, VR is created
automatically.
пт, 29 мар. 2019 г., 10:04 Fariborz Navidan :
> There should be inconsistency in DB. Because I did a wrong before and have
> deleted all records in domain_router and router_network_ref tables
> manually. I tho
There should be inconsistency in DB. Because I did a wrong before and have
deleted all records in domain_router and router_network_ref tables
manually. I thought it will cause CS to think network is not implemented
yet and will re-implement but it didn't. Indeed it still shows in logs
"Asking Virtu
4.11.2 with KVM.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:08 PM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> cloudstack version, hypervisor (version) ?
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 13:34, Fariborz Navidan
> wrote:
>
> > I did marked router vm instance to Stopped and set remoed to NULL. In
> > infrastructure overview it shows 1 virtu
cloudstack version, hypervisor (version) ?
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 13:34, Fariborz Navidan
wrote:
> I did marked router vm instance to Stopped and set remoed to NULL. In
> infrastructure overview it shows 1 virtual router but clicking on View,
> shows no data. Then I restarted the network with cl
I did marked router vm instance to Stopped and set remoed to NULL. In
infrastructure overview it shows 1 virtual router but clicking on View,
shows no data. Then I restarted the network with clleanup, It said
[Datacenter:1] is unreachable and automatically marked the vm instance to
destroyed and re
I've recently upgraded a couple of installations from 4.8 to 4.11.2.
Since the upgrade, I am unable to perform certain operations, such as
adding a Network Offering, via the UI. This shows up as getting a
Session Expired message, and kicking me out. I've checked the
underlying requests, and it se
They running the restart network with cleanup=true
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, 10:39 am Fariborz Navidan,
wrote:
> It fails to restart networl. Log says it cannot find virtual router. Bellow
> is the log:
>
> 2019-03-29 10:53:41,621 DEBUG [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl]
> (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:ctx-277a1d9d)
Right. Another user did same thing here on ML (Jevgeni, from 19th March),
and had exact same issues (on basic zone) - please check it.
I did advised back then to try to "undelete' the router, by changing a
DB/table values in vm_instance table, to mark VR's "state" column back to
"Stopped" and set
My zone is a basic one. Unfortunately.,It does not work for me It think
router exists for the network but it does not!
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:18 PM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> what ACS version, what kind of network/zone ?
>
> In 4.11.2, Advanced Zone, Isolated network (KVM), I have deleted router
what ACS version, what kind of network/zone ?
In 4.11.2, Advanced Zone, Isolated network (KVM), I have deleted router,
then started a VM, which triggered a creation of new VM.
Again, destroyed VR, restarted network withOUT the "clean up" option, and
again new VR was created.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019
While on custom offering with 1 cpu, 1000 MHz/core, 512MB RAM:
http://10.2.x.y:8080/client/api?command=scaleVirtualMachine&response=json&id=19a67e20-c747-43bb-b149-c2b2294002f9&serviceofferingid=1b86713b-0131-4b25-8392-46518104bb90&details%5B0%5D.cpuSpeed=1300&details%5B0%5D.cpuNumber=2&details%5B
It fails to restart networl. Log says it cannot find virtual router. Bellow
is the log:
2019-03-29 10:53:41,621 DEBUG [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Heartbeat-1:ctx-277a1d9d) (logid:9902f1d7) Detected management
node left, id:8, nodeIP:178.33.230.41
2019-03-29 10:53:41,621 INFO [c.c.c.Cluste
Hi Takahashi-san,
Trillian is more of a ShapeBlue side project which we have chosen to open
source rather than a CloudStack community project - I will respond to you
off-list shortly.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 29/03/2019, 01:21, "高橋海" wrote:
Hello. I'm new to
22 matches
Mail list logo
