Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14

2019-04-21 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Agree to disagree, but C'est la vie ;) On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 5:14 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Rafael - you're digressing from the discussion. You're right with the > semantic versioning definition but we don't really follow the referenced > wiki/document by the word. > > > The wiki has gone throug

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14

2019-04-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Rafael - you're digressing from the discussion. You're right with the semantic versioning definition but we don't really follow the referenced wiki/document by the word. The wiki has gone through several changes where they were not all agreed and voted on. Per the original intent and our under

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14

2019-04-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Vladimir, Thanks for sharing your opinion. I can understand the position of our conservative users such as yourself with respect to a potential upgrade, both the effort and the risks involved in doing the upgrades. That said, I would like to encourage you and other conservative users to c

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14

2019-04-21 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Major? Have we discussed the 5.0.0 already? 4.13 is not a major release. At least, according with this page [1], 4.13 is considered a minor one. > For those that may not be familiar with Semantic Versioning, the number > format is: X.Y.Z, where X is the major version, Y is the minor version, Z > i