+1 (binding)
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Abhishek Kumar
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 6:41 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ;
d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.1.0 (RC2)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.17.1.0 release, with t
Hi all,
+1 from me, I tested upgrade (from 4.16.1), CKS plugin and basic CRUD
operations - looking good.
Best wishes,
Vladi
Abhishek Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.17.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/clouds
yes. But ssvm and cpvm might not work well because of the ip routes in them.
You should work out a better design.
-Wei
On Friday, 16 September 2022, technologyrss.m...@gmail.com <
technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *@*Jordan Thanks.
>
> **
>
> *server A* and
> *server B*
> both server have o
*@*Jordan Thanks.
**
*server A* and
*server B*
both server have only one interface using public traffic.
no any LAN interface for internal communication.
both server are host on cloud dedicated server.
can I create AD zone + security group using only *WAN* interface?
I am with *@**namhost.*
This means the MGM server cannot connect to the SSVMs.
Go to gui -> Infrastructure -> alerts and check what is being reported
there.
Also ssh to CS and check
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log for any errors or
warning messages.
>From the top of my head without looking at the en
Hi Jordan
Thank you. We managed to set up /28 & /29 subnet via 1 NIC on KVM host
and /29 on Cloudstack MS. However, we seem to have an issue with our
SSVM agent not connecting to MS. Yesterday it was working fine and now
with re-deployment it just does not want to connect for some reason.
W
Cloudstack MGM server needs only 1 ip that is used:
- for users to access GUI/API
- for Cloudstack to contact the hypervisor
So the answer is yes, the larger network should go to the KVM host.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:07 AM Granwille Strauss
wrote:
> Hi Jordan
>
> Do I understand correctly t
Hi all,
Just to remind you, the Call for Presentations deadline for this year’s
CloudStack Collaboration Conference is tonight at 23:59.
You can submit your presentation here –
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeE2o9IZTVHaPvsBJXQW2gZjZqxjZ7CynUJb9MZ22s7uyzyDA/viewform
Kind regards,
Jam
Hi Jordan
Do I understand correctly that it would be better to have bigger subnet,
/28 on the KVM server and NOT on the Cloudstack MGMT server?
The plan is to have Shared network + security group with full public IP
space, not Private IP. Because we want to launch VPS that is publicly
access
Hi,
Should I assume that Server 1: Cloud MGMT is where Cloudstack management
server will be installed? so you will have one ip from 31.72.136.230/28 and
the rest will be unusable (as the KVM host will not have access to them).
Regarding Server 2: KVM (Plug public ip usable 5) 51.42.126.116/29 if
10 matches
Mail list logo
