I skip this test using vLANID.
Now I test as below:
https://prnt.sc/uWF76ofrzBFC
https://prnt.sc/QCXKzF61ze5X
https://prnt.sc/Cn3jbKIel-Jk
https://prnt.sc/JOdqBQalfg0d
https://prnt.sc/88x5IAP_2ojp
https://prnt.sc/_zPRZPZ0cYRD
POD
172.22.0.1
255.255.252.0
172.22.0.51 172.22.0.60
Guest: vlan
It looks the vm is not associated to any security groups. you need to
update the vm with security groups.
-Wei
Technology Mail 于 2023年10月4日周三 下午5:48写道：
> I skip this test using vLANID.
>
> Now I test as below:
>
> https://prnt.sc/uWF76ofrzBFC
> https://prnt.sc/QCXKzF61ze5X
> https://prnt.sc/Cn3
I skip this test using vLANID.
Now I test as below:
https://prnt.sc/uWF76ofrzBFC
https://prnt.sc/QCXKzF61ze5X
https://prnt.sc/Cn3jbKIel-Jk
https://prnt.sc/JOdqBQalfg0d
https://prnt.sc/88x5IAP_2ojp
https://prnt.sc/_zPRZPZ0cYRD
POD
172.22.0.1
255.255.252.0
172.22.0.51 172.22.0.60
Guest : vla
You need to set the ports on your router to trunk mode (or hybrid mode
to allow vlan 20-50).
If you cannot configure the route, please use Shared networks (in basic
zone or advanced zone) with vlan://untagged.
-Wei
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 14:17, Technology Mail
wrote:
> yes, your first think is
Hello,
Thank you for the response. In this case if your bridge is cloudbr0, then
your new bridge will be created and your physical interface that will be
tagged with VLAN 20 for example "ens9f0np0.20" and the traffic for the IP
range 172.22.0.1/22 might be unknown on that VLAN. Your guest bridge w
Hi Boris,
Thank you, will check ෞഀ䴀椀琀 昀爀攀甀渀搀氀椀挀栀攀渀 䜀爀ﰀßen / With kind regards
Wilken Verleger
proIO GmbH
Kleyerstr. 79 - 89 / Tor 13
D-60326 Frankfurt am Main
- Support -
Mail: supp...@proio.com
24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Boris S
yes, your first think is right,
2nd I am using only one physical interface and all network tag is
*cloudbr0*, and I put vLANID 20-50 this is mandatory field so I input
this, just it.
Thanks.
On 10/4/2023 6:09 PM, Jayanth Reddy wrote:
Hello,
If I understand correctly, you've a network where
Hello,
If I understand correctly, you've a network where we can consider it as a
"management network" for your hosts. I believe your expectation is to have
your VMs attached onto the same management network on the bridge "cloudbr0"
so that you'll get access via your gateway 172.22.0.1.
I don't th
Hi Wei ZHOU
There are no problem with ping.
I connect to management server by ssh with no problems.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: "Wei ZHOU"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 18:04:47 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
Hi,
The route should be good. But the TCP packets
*Hello,*
Can I create Advanced zone using my only LAN network?
Internet traffic come from my LAN gateway. no any public ip on host kvm.
LAN: 172.22.0.1/22
kvm LAN: ens9f0np0
Bridge : cloudbr0
*cat ifcfg-ens9f0np0*
DEVICE=ens9f0np0
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=cloudbr0
UUID=503ef6de-1288-4d2d-a09a-3f7d12
'capacity.skipcounting.hours' is used to determine how low after a VM is
stopped its resources are released, i.e. not counted to its host's used
capacity. This is not directly related to 'capacity.check.period' afaict.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:28 AM Loth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the quick
Hi,
The route should be good. But the TCP packets might be dropped somewhere
(ping uses ICMP packets not TCP)
-Wei
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 11:01, jaejong wrote:
> Yes, eth1 IPs of system vms are in the same subnet as 10.0.33.1
> there is no dropped packets during ping.
>
> thanks a lot!
>
>
> -
Yes, eth1 IPs of system vms are in the same subnet as 10.0.33.1
there is no dropped packets during ping.
thanks a lot!
-Original Message-
From: "Wei ZHOU"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 17:35:56 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
Hi,
+1 with what Wido said.
The pac
Hi,
+1 with what Wido said.
The packet is probably dropped/blocked at a point between SSVM and the
management server (if it is running fine).
Are the eth1 IPs of system vms in the same subnet as 10.0.33.1 ?
-Wei
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 09:25, jaejong wrote:
> Hi Wei ZHOU!
>
> Yes, I can ping
Op 04-10-2023 om 09:25 schreef jaejong:
Hi Wei ZHOU!
Yes, I can ping to server ip(10.0.33.1) from SSVM and SPVM.
netstat does not report about 0.0.0.0:8250.
Is it right?
Oh, then what is the problems!!
Yes. It's normal that it shows this way.
If it listens on IPv6, it will also liste
Hello,
Thanks for the quick response. according to
https://bitworks.software/2018-08-23-cloudstack-global-variables-atlas-system.html
(not sure if accurate) capacity.check.period is interlinked with
capacity.skipcounting.hours. If I disable capacity.skipcounting.hours
(set to 0) does it not matter
Hi Wei ZHOU!
Yes, I can ping to server ip(10.0.33.1) from SSVM and SPVM.
netstat does not report about 0.0.0.0:8250.
Is it right?
Oh, then what is the problems!!
-Original Message-
From: "Wei ZHOU"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 15:31:50 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 n
17 matches
Mail list logo
