Hi all,
As the ongoing 4.21 release is coming to an end, I would like to propose the
plan for our next LTS release, 4.22.0.
As discussed here [1], I propose the following timelines to ensure the release
stays on track for this year:
* Feature/Improvement/Bug-fix Freeze: End of September.
GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: Get Rid of Account
"Types"? and just use "Roles"?
@MI-DROZ @rohityadavcloud (cc @DaanHoogland)
This is an interesting discussion. One point that was not mentioned is that
"account types" have another part in the system: they delimit
Sounds like a good plan, thanks for stepping up Wei.
Regards.
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 18:15
To: dev ; users
Subject: [PROPOSAL] 4.20.2.0 release
Hi all,
The latest LTS version Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 was released on 10th
June.
S
GitHub user MI-DROZ added a comment to the discussion: Get Rid of Account
"Types"? and just use "Roles"?
Thanks for the insight and the history.
Considering the backward compatibility, it does seem like removal of account
types would be off the table.
Just thinking through this I wonder if so
Hi all,
The latest LTS version Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 was released on 10th
June.
Since then, around 70 issues have been fixed in the 4.20 branch.
I think it is time to create a new 4.20.2.0 release, so CloudStack users
can benefit from the work of the community.
I propose myself as the releas
Hi All,
There is regression reported for StorPool storage plugin, and fixed here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/11490 - thanks Slavka for
reporting it and raising a fix PR.
I will cut a new RC once the PR test results look good. If you find any
other issues with 4.21.0.0 RC4, report t
Hello everyone,
I apologise again for this, but my vote remains -1. When the
`snapshot.backup.to.secondary` setting is enabled, and a volume is created
from a snapshot in StorPool, the resulting volume is empty because the
plug-in does not receive the correct snapshot object.
I’ll continue working
Hello,
After discussing with my colleagues, we’ve agreed to proceed with the RC4
release and treat this as a known issue.
Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused and for the delay in
the process.
Best regards,
Slavka Peleva
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:41 AM Slavka Peleva wrote:
> Su
GitHub user rohityadavcloud edited a comment on the discussion: Get Rid of
Account "Types"? and just use "Roles"?
Good ideas and discussion. However, due to maintaining backward compatibility
and supporting both static and dynamic role checkers, it's not possible to
remove support for account
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Get Rid of
Account "Types"? and just use "Roles"?
Good ideas and discussion. However, due to maintaining backward compatibility
and supporting both static and dynamic role checkers, it's not possible to
remove support for account
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CS 4.20.1 -
possible bug (or I don't know what I am doing)
> isn’t it also possible during a (re)start , @weizhouapache ?
@DaanHoogland
not 100% sure, I only faced the issue when deploy a new vm
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apa
GitHub user iamfoolberg added a comment to the discussion: Unable to list
running VMs from PVE cluster in CloudStack
Is there any way we can add the running vms in cloudstack, since the PVE api
provids the functions(list status, start/stop/...)...
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloud
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: Unable to list
running VMs from PVE cluster in CloudStack
Hi @iamfoolberg, thanks for trying out the extension framework
Currently, cloudstsack won't able to list the already running vm's on
proxmox.
It will only list the vm that
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Unable to
list running VMs from PVE cluster in CloudStack
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11493#discussioncomment-14
GitHub user iamfoolberg created a discussion: Unable to list running VMs from
PVE cluster in CloudStack
Description:
I've successfully added a Proxmox VE (PVE) cluster and hosts to CloudStack
following:
The wiki guide: [CloudStack Extensions
Framework](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
I found the problem, described here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10136
rhel9 does not support discarcd/trim with old pc-i440fx-rhel7.6.0 machine type.
Switching to q35 solves the problem.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daan Hoogland
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August 20
GitHub user wverleger closed a discussion: Almalinux 9.6 - UEFI Secure/Legacy
Boot
Hi,
using: ACS 4.19.3.0
Hypervisor: Alma Linux 9.6
Instance: Ubuntu 24 LTS
I was wondering if there is any limitation with Alma Linux 9.6 and UEFI
Secure/Legacy Boot?
Trying to create/start a VM results in a
GitHub user wverleger added a comment to the discussion: Almalinux 9.6 - UEFI
Secure/Legacy Boot
I was able to fix it. I had a mix up in the uefi.properties settings for Alma
Linux.
Corrected settings are:
guest.nvram.template.secure=/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd
guest.nvram.templ
Suresh, sorry for the late reply.
Functionality from 4.20 isn't broken. I'm discussing this internally with
my colleagues to determine if we can treat this as a known issue rather
than a release-blocking one. I will let you know as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Slavka
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: CS 4.20.1 -
possible bug (or I don't know what I am doing)
isn’t it also possible during a (re)start , @weizhouapache ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11459#discussioncomment-14174710
This is an a
20 matches
Mail list logo
