GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@alexandremattioli can you comment
@kiranchavala I see some discrepancies in your description, though I think
there is some merit to this issue. Can you check and
GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option of
disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@kiranchavala and others If I'm understanding it right I guess we are mixing
listall functionality with displaynetwork functionality.
`displaynetwork` param
GitHub user alexandremattioli added a comment to the discussion: Provide the
option of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@kiranchavala I'm struggling to see the use case.
Is the idea to disable a network so no new VMs can use it?
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
> yes @weizhouapache ,
>
> to allow to undo the on-display flag, we must display it, so an exemption to
> the non-display directive must be defined to do that. A
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@alexandremattioli @DaanHoogland @weizhouapache
>From the Ui point of view
As an admin user from the UI if I can disable "Display network" for a
particular
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
display or not-display, not enable/disable, right ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9162#discussioncomment-9643959
This is an
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
yes @weizhouapache ,
to allow to undo the on-display flag, we must display it, so an exemption to
the non-display directive must be defined to do that. A trivial
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
@lohitslohit you're better off following this
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md
The upstream docs website is outdated and we need to improve it. Ubuntu 18.04
isn't support yet, it
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Bash script to
install CloudStack
Thanks for sharing! I'm trying to build this: https://c8k.in and I might steal
something from these scripts :)
GitHub link:
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache traffic mirroring is a great tool but it doesnt allow for taking
action against malicious traffic.
Would Option 1 be more straightforward to implement? And in this option, i
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
this seems like a discussion that ccan lead to several implementation
ideas/issues. I'm converting it to a discussion.
GitHub link:
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache , ive updated the diagram to reflect Option 1 better.
Is my understanding right?
![Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 57 21
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
> Hi @weizhouapache ,
>
> Allowing VNF to be the LB Provider would be great, but come to think of it, i
> think it will pose a challenge because Cloudstack will need to recognise the
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
Hi @weizhouapache ,
Allowing VNF to be the LB Provider would be great, but come to think of it, i
think it will pose a challenge because Cloudstack will need to recognise the
different
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
> @weizhouapache actually in my diagram above, im suggesting to not use VNF to
> provide Autoscaling Feature. Let the current logic work as is.
>
> The end result we are trying to
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
Currently the autoscale feature has dependency on loadbalancing service. For
now it only works with isolated networks or vpc with lb.
Do you want VNF to be working as the LB provider
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache actually in my diagram above, im suggesting to not use VNF to
provide Autoscaling Feature. Let the current logic work as is.
The end result we are trying to achieve is to
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
okay. But during the dev environment setup. I had executed the
`mvn -Pdeveloper,systemvm clean install`
Given in this docs
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.1/developersguide/developer_guide.html
But
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
okay @weizhouapache
How to check the JVM heap size?
I am using the ubuntu 18.04. Is it okay to use 18.04
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9157#discussioncomment-9615173
This
GitHub user sureshanaparti added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
Hi @lohitslohit Can you try with mbx-based env, details here:
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#mbx-based-development
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> @weizhouapache Again I had tried to run the same cmd. but I got amother
> error.
>
> ```
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools .. SUCCESS [ 0.014
> s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
@weizhouapache Again I had tried to run the same cmd. but I got amother error.
```
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools .. SUCCESS [ 0.014 s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack apidocs
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> okay. But during the dev environment setup. I had executed the
>
> `mvn -Pdeveloper,systemvm clean install`
>
> Given in this docs
>
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> okay @weizhouapache
>
> How to check the JVM heap size? I am using the ubuntu 18.04. Is it okay to
> use 18.04
export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx4096m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=1024m"
then run the maven command
it may be
GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: KVM not listing
Unmanaged Instances
Please read the documentation. It lists's only stopped VMs and it requires
listen_tcp=1 in the libvirtd config
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> > > which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> @0x I tried using Debian12 as a KVM host with CloudStack 4.19.0.1.
> `Addhost` failed initially, then I installed the `cpu-checker`. Then executed
> the `cloudstack-setup-agent` , and the host is visible in the
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > > > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual
> > > > machine, which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x Yes, it's because the current deb packages are only tested, used
and supported for Ubuntu that you're welcome to use to an out-of-box
installation experience, support for Debian is largely experimental
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x I tried using Debian12 as a KVM host with CloudStack 4.19.0.1.
`Addhost` failed initially, then I installed the `cpu-checker`. Then executed
the `cloudstack-setup-agent` , and the host is visible in the
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> When I failed to add storage, I clicked on return to fix and then clicked on
> next again. Add Host reported an error again, stating that it already exists.
> I think this is a logical bug in the web UI.
>
>
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
initialized state.
Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine, which belongs to nested
virtualization.
Cloudstack was executing LSCPU related
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> > which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was executing
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
After my continuous investigation. I found that the kvm ok program is missing
in the debian12 system. That's because cloudstack setup agent called kvm ok.
Just install: **sudo apt install cpu-checker** to
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was executing
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x
can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9155#discussioncomment-9614840
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9155#discussioncomment-9614839
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
When I failed to add storage, I clicked on return to fix and then clicked on
next again. Add Host reported an error again, stating that it already exists. I
think this is a logical bug in the web UI.
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
Hello, I have kept you waiting for a long time. I have added a brand new host
log, and besides that, I haven't done anything on the web UI.
**Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Hi All,
>
> We managed to resolve our issue.
>
> Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
> >
> >
> > Yes, it exists.
> >
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
Yes, it exists.
GitHub user zap51 added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Hi All,
>
> We managed to resolve our issue.
>
> Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was down,
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
>
> Yes, it exists.
>
>
GitHub user dineshjchoudhary added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
@weizhouapache We are using
Core Zone Type
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
The libvirtd configuration file, which is automatically generated by
Cloudstack, has not been modified by me
[libvirtd.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/15196981/libvirtd.txt)
GitHub link:
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Hi All,
We managed to resolve our issue.
Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was down, while
other
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Hi @dineshjchoudhary @akshaybachhav
Did you guys managed to resolve this? We have Compute 6 Nodes and our 6th Node
is having
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Have you disabled apparmour on them, what guide or steps of installation if
> any did you follow @akshaybachhav Make
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> * vm gets ip from dhcp
It looks we forgot to ask you
- what type of zone do you use ?
- do you use vlan ?
GitHub
GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
If you are testing communication between 2 VMs on the SAME network, but on
different KVM hosts, then you should
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Have you disabled apparmour on them, what guide or steps of installation if
> any did you follow @akshaybachhav Make
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> @akshaybachhav can you create a new vm on the host (where the VR is not
> running on), and check
>
> * if the new
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> @akshaybachhav can you check iptables/firewall rules in the VM? Can you ping
> the VR from the VMs? You can try
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
@akshaybachhav can you check iptables/firewall rules in the VM? Can you ping
the VR from the VMs?
You can try
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> I am able to ping the VR from the VM which is on same host. But if I ping
> from VM to VR which is not on same host
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
@akshaybachhav
can you create a new vm on the host (where the VR is not running on), and check
- if the new VM gets
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Have you disabled apparmour on them, what guide or steps of installation if any
did you follow @akshaybachhav
Make
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> > I am able to ping the VR from the VM which is on same host. But if I ping
> > from VM to VR which is not on same
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Virtual
machine on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate
(can't ping each other).
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> @akshaybachhav can you check iptables/firewall rules in the VM? Can you ping
> the VR from the VMs? You can try
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: API:
listVirtualMachines endpoint doesn't return VMs in Expunged state
@OlegChuev this is possible via tuning these global settings:
- Allow user expunge recover vm (allow.user.expunge.recover.vm) Determines
whether users can
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: API:
listVirtualMachines endpoint doesn't return VMs in Expunged state
@OlegChuev not sure if this is actually desirable. An expunged VM is
unrecoverable, so why would we want the user to allow to retrieve information
about it?
GitHub user OlegChuev added a comment to the discussion: API:
listVirtualMachines endpoint doesn't return VMs in Expunged state
BTW I also found out that after the deletion of the VM with a custom Service
Offering, ACS cleans up information from the `user_vm_details` table.
Therefore, it's
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: API:
listVirtualMachines endpoint doesn't return VMs in Expunged state
@OlegChuev , I hope your queries were answered. I moved this issue to the Q
section. Feel free to continue discussing it or create a new issue, thanks.
GitHub
GitHub user OlegChuev added a comment to the discussion: API:
listVirtualMachines endpoint doesn't return VMs in Expunged state
@DaanHoogland, a list of expunged VMs could be useful for retrieving historical
data. For example, users could have the ability to list information about all
VMs
GitHub user palashbiswas-git added a comment to the discussion: To support
multiple ports for autoscaling
Hi @DaanHoogland ,
I'm currently working with a container-based application that supports
autoscaling. However, I'm facing a limitation due to having a single load
balancer and single
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
at first sight this looks like a valid feature request @palashbiswas-git , but
can you elaborate on the configurations/requests/settings that you expect and
how they would bahave, including
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple ports
for autoscaling
This is a great feature for us. Right now, in order to overcome this
limitation, we deploy an NGINX instance in our VM, configured with static
routes. These static routes would then route traffic to
GitHub user palashbiswas-git added a comment to the discussion: To support
multiple ports for autoscaling
Hi @kiranchavala,
You are correct that this can be achieved through Kubernetes. However, our
requirement is to use either containers or normal VMs, where we can't handle
multiple load
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
@palashbiswas-git , I am sure you have a valid use case, and I think something
like this could be implemented in the future. I read this as a generic problem
statement and not a very
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
Hi @palashbiswas-git
Have you tried cloudstack autoscaler for kubernetes ?
https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/cloudstack
When a
GitHub user my-code-AL added a comment to the discussion: Adding Account to
Project
Thank you for the clarification!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9148#discussioncomment-9611921
This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org.
To
GitHub user pcfriek1987 added a comment to the discussion: How to install SSL
certificate on clouds tack 4.19 version
does it work with a jks? I'm using a pkcs12.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9149#discussioncomment-9604228
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Adding Account to
Project
@my-code-AL
For domains and users: it is not necessary to create domain admin account for
each domain. You can create new domains and accounts under the domain as a root
admin itself. I'm not sure what you
GitHub user titu044 edited a discussion: How to install SSL certificate on
clouds tack 4.19 version
This is not working anyone help me
I have wildcard ssl certificate when i convert PEM to JKS and Upload my
management server /etc/cloudstack/management/server.properties
https.enable=true
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Adding new oauth
providers
@amend07
currently only google and github are supported.
you can add a provider similar as
GitHub user amend07 edited a discussion: Adding new oauth providers
Hello there,
I just want to add keycloak as identity provider in oauth2 configuration. I add
it in the **oauth.plugins** in the web interface. when i set up it in **OAuth
provider** configuration under **Provider** section I
GitHub user amend07 added a comment to the discussion: unable to create another
oauth provider
@shwstppr I am happy. create a discussion and mention me.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9129#discussioncomment-9577062
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: unable to create
another oauth provider
@amend07 can we close this or maybe convert it to a discussion?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9129#discussioncomment-9577061
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user harikrishna-patnala added a comment to the discussion: unable to
create another oauth provider
@amend07 you are welcome to implement the plugin and raise a PR, I would say it
is quite easy to implement I can surely help you review. All you need to do is
implement
GitHub user harikrishna-patnala added a comment to the discussion: unable to
create another oauth provider
@amend07 currently keycloak is not supported (only google and github), in order
to have that support, it is needed to implement the keycloak plugin under
"user-authenticators" >
GitHub user amend07 added a comment to the discussion: unable to create another
oauth provider
> @amend07 currently keycloak is not supported (only google and github), in
> order to have that support, it is needed to implement the keycloak plugin
> under "user-authenticators" > "oauth2".
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: unable to
create another oauth provider
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9129#discussioncomment-9577055
This
GitHub user amend07 added a comment to the discussion: unable to create another
oauth provider
@harikrishna-patnala am happy to work with you. help me to join the team.
thanks again for your support
GitHub link:
GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: unable to create
another oauth provider
@amend07 not sure but currently only Google an GitHub are supported as plugins.
@harikrishna-patnala is it possible to add keycloak?
GitHub link:
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: Help with Apache
Cloudstack On a Single Machine
@charlesweng You could use the following resource:
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/1-user.md to bring up an
all-in-one setup.
GitHub link:
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: WHMCS Module?
@theozsnowman You're right, it does seem that the CloudStack module for WHMCS
hasn't been maintained for long. Some other solutions that you could possibly
look at would be CloudStack module for HostBill or StackConsole,
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: AutoGenView and
RouteView issue
@SamEsmailR Is the package-lock.json file missing by any chance?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9089#discussioncomment-9517499
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: AutoGenView and
RouteView issue
Hi @SamEsmailR I use nodejs v16 on Mac OSX and Ubuntu 22.04/24.04, and I don't
face any issues. Was this the first time you've tried this or do you have any
local changes you were trying to
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: AutoGenView and
RouteView issue
@SamEsmailR, not sure if this helps:
```
$ npm -version
14:53:26
8.19.4
```
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9089#discussioncomment-9508149
This is an automatically
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Define a release
schedule for the project
I like the last sentence of your first point. We still have a 2 releases per
year policy though we never make that.
As for the second point I think we should reduce out version to a 3 number
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: logging standards
in CloudStack
@weizhouapache a possible solution to this could be to add an error uuid to the
exception and use this in the loging. Users don't see the logging but only
exceptions thrown. idea?
GitHub link:
GitHub user rohityadavcloud edited a comment on the discussion: Contribute
Cloudstack Project
@lohitslohit to join CloudStack community slack use this link -
https://join.slack.com/t/apachecloudstack/shared_invite/zt-2j7e7nimo-1OUROPE9N79u1Fx7KW3vwQ
(the ASF slack is limited by access).
GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed the discussion with a comment: Contribute
Cloudstack Project
@lohitslohit to join CloudStack community slack use this link -
https://join.slack.com/t/apachecloudstack/shared_invite/zt-2j7e7nimo-1OUROPE9N79u1Fx7KW3vwQ
(the ASF slack is limited by access).
GitHub user lohitslohit closed a discussion: Contribute Cloudstack Project
Hi, I'm new to the CloudStack project and would like to contribute. How can I
join the Slack community? I don't have an @apache.org email address. Also, how
do I join the mailing list?
GitHub link:
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: Contribute
Cloudstack Project
Sure Thanks for your update
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9085#discussioncomment-9451183
This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org.
To
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Contribute
Cloudstack Project
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9085#discussioncomment-9451181
This is an
GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: Contribute
Cloudstack Project
Hello, @lohitslohit
Thanks for willing to contribute.
Most interactions occurs in the mailing list, PRs, issues, and discussions. For
joining the Apache CloudStack mailing lists, you can take a look
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: How CloudStack
handles multiple NFS type Primary Storage
@shaerul It follows a lazy deployment strategy, i.e. it copies the templates
(images) to a primary storage only when it needs to create a VM's root disk on
a pool. There's
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
