...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DKIM Fail] Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN
provider
Hi PL,
You can check the ikev2 support in 4.15+ here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4953
I think a generic VPN framework-provider feature is probably what we need (i.e.
to let user
is available on Debian:
https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/openvpn
Regards.
From: Pierre-Luc Dion
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 20:10
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
Just
think a process like this
> could
> >> be simpler than what we've right now, and the ovpn download+import
> workflow
> >> would be easier than what we'll get from either strongswan/current or
> >> wireguard. While I like the simplicity of wireguard, which is more like
&g
dual VMs (much like setting up
>> ssh key) or use something like TailScale.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> From: Gabriel Bräscher
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
>> To: dev
>> Cc: users
>> Subject:
h like setting up
> ssh key) or use something like TailScale.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Gabriel Bräscher
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
> To: dev
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN pr
something like TailScale.
Regards.
From: Gabriel Bräscher
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
I understand that OpenVPN is a great option and far adopted.
I am ++1
I understand that OpenVPN is a great option and far adopted.
I am ++1 in allowing Users/Admins to choose which VPN provider suits them
best; creating an offering (or global settings) that would allow setting
which VPN provider will be used would be awesome.
I understand that OpenVPN is a great
Hello,
Daan, I agree we should provide capability to select the vpn solution to
use, the question would be, should it be a global setting generic for the
whole region or per VPC?
I think it should be a global setting to reduce the requirement complexity
of a region, but per VPC or
If thinking of only Site-to-Site VPN , then OpenVPN and WireGuard is no
much different , or even current one is gpod. Only only time setup at
router. However if considering of Mobile Client, OpenVPN is more
complicated.
The only concern now is multiple people in the same public IP need to
This is a potential religious debate, I think it makes the most sense to
try and make the provider optional and let the operator or even the
end-user decide. I see how this is an extra challenge, but does it make
sense?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:24 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> We've
l Message-----
> > > From: Rohit Yadav
> > > Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> &
enVPN, and then a framework later on.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote acce
--Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
>
> All,
>
> We've historically supported openswan and nowadays strongswan
+1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
All,
We've historically supported openswan
Hey!
I’m personally a strong proponent of Wireguard. A couple years back,
implementing a S2S or remote-access VPN with WG was complicated and it still is
- but there’s definitely more tooling available these days. There are clients
for just about every major platform - desktop and mobile.
In
All,
We've historically supported openswan and nowadays strongswan as the VPN
provider in VR for both site-to-site and remote access modes. After discussing
the situation with a few users and colleagues I learnt that OpenVPN is
generally far easier to use, have clients for most OS and
16 matches
Mail list logo
