Re: Dynamic roles question

depends on the use case, for changing departments the move user is right, for upgrading rights within a department probably not. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, Daan, thank you for the clarification. It doesn't seems like the > thing

Re: Dynamic roles question

Hello, Daan, thank you for the clarification. It doesn't seems like the thing I'm talking about and actually, I don't think the approach enables the solving of the problem because VMs are owned by the account, and other related information like billing is connected with the account and, thus,

Re: Dynamic roles question

actually whet is in place is moving users between accounts, and thus allowing for their role to change. The accounts would stay the same, but the effective role of the users changes with it's account. MoverUserCmd is the API. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev

Re: Dynamic roles question

Hello, Ilya. If it is already in place, then it's awesome. Thank you very much for assistance. I'll check it soon. 2018-05-18 14:37 GMT+07:00 ilya musayev : > Ivan > > This is already done in 4.11, I’m not next to comp to check but ShapeBlue > has a feature created

Re: Dynamic roles question

Ivan This is already done in 4.11, I’m not next to comp to check but ShapeBlue has a feature created that would allow for movement between different roles. Regards ilya On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:03 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, community. > > I'm thinking about

Re: Dynamic roles question

Hi Ivan, This would be a good improvement. Instead of changing the rules for the account role based on the requirements or on demand, account can be mapped to a new role (manually or automatic after trial) of the same role type [User]. Do you have any use case for changing account role for Admin

Re: Dynamic roles question

Yep, something like that is the key. Add an optional parameter to updateAccount. чт, 17 мая 2018 г., 20:56 Rafael Weingärtner : > That seems a nice enhancement. > > Are you thinking about adding an extra parameter to "updateAccount"? > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03

Re: Dynamic roles question

That seems a nice enhancement. Are you thinking about adding an extra parameter to "updateAccount"? On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, community. > > I'm thinking about implementing the feature for accounts which permits to > change

Dynamic roles question

Hello, community. I'm thinking about implementing the feature for accounts which permits to change account role. Basically, the rationale is trials or demonstration modes which restricts users from doing extra stuff, like VM creation, service offering changes, etc. Basically, after trial the