RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-08-12 Thread Alex Mattioli
them to the inside interfaces of the VRs. Cheers Alex -Original Message- From: Kristaps Cudars Sent: 12 August 2021 10:37 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks Hi Rohit, I think its excellent and satisfies all

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-08-12 Thread Kristaps Cudars
all done! I create a domain record that points to my guest > VM IPv6 address a test webserver on > http://ipv6-isolated-ntwk-demo.yadav.cloud/ > > (Note: I'll get rid of the tunnel and request a new /48 block after a few > days, sharing this solely for testing purposes) > &g

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-08-11 Thread Hean Seng
ed36:1::/64 via dev > > * > ... and I enabled firewall rules to allow any traffic to pass for the new > /64 network > > And voila all done! I create a domain record that points to my guest > VM IPv6 address a test webserver on > http://ipv6-isolated-ntwk-demo.yadav

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-08-11 Thread Rohit Yadav
g purposes) Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 12:46 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks Op 19-07-2021 om 20:38 schreef Kristaps Cudars: > Hi Wido, > > I assume that flouting ip will not work grate with ingre

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
<mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> > Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> > <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > ma

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-16 Thread Hean Seng
own AS number > >>>>> - The peer's address(es) > >>>>> > >>>>> With FRR you can simply say: > >>>>> > >>>>> neighbor 2001:db8:4fa::179 remote-as external > >>>>

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-16 Thread Wido den Hollander
i.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>>; > Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl>

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-16 Thread Hean Seng
ex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi Wido, > >>> > That's pretty much in line with our thoughts, thanks > for > >>> the input. > >>> >

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-16 Thread Wido den Hollander
.matti...@shapeblue.com <mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> > Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> > <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > mailt

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-15 Thread Hean Seng
ber on a per network basis (for > > bring your > > > own AS and IP scenario) > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Alex > > > >

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-15 Thread Wido den Hollander
blue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav >     mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>>; >     Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl> >     <mailto:gabr...@

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-15 Thread Hean Seng
he VR >> > - /64 per network >> > - SLACC for IP addressing >> > >> > I believe the next big question is then "on which level of ACS do we >> > manage AS numbers?". I see two options: >> > 1) Private AS number on a per-zone basis >&g

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-15 Thread Hean Seng
> > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> > > Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org <mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>; > > Alex Mattioli &

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-15 Thread Wido den Hollander
k.apache.org <mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Alex Mattioli mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>> Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>; Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>; Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl>> Subject: Re: IPV6 in

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-14 Thread Hean Seng
AS and IP scenario) > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cheers > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wido den Hollander > > Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli >

RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-14 Thread Alex Mattioli
: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks Hi I replied in another thread, i think do not need implement BGP or OSPF, that would be complicated . We only need assign IPv6 's /64 prefix to Virtual Router (VR) in NAT zone, and the VR responsible to deliver single IPv6 to VM via DHCP6. In VR, you need

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-14 Thread Hean Seng
S > and IP scenario) > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > Alex > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander > Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli > Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-14 Thread Alex Mattioli
- From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Yadav ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks On 7/7/21 1:16 PM, Alex Mattioli wrote: > Hi all, > @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@sh

IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-07 Thread Alex Mattioli
Hi all, @Wei Zhou @Rohit Yadav and myself are investigating how to enable IPV6 support on Isolated and VPC networks and would like your input on it. At the moment we are looking at implementing FRR with BGP (and possibly OSPF) on