Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

I did try to dedicate a Pod to an account, however it whilst it meant other accounts couldn't launch in the pod, it didn't force the target account to have newly created vm's placed in that pod. Cloudstack continued to use its regular placement algorithm, which we have set to FirstFitPlanner, and

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi Rafael, I hadn't tried allocating more VM's until the host gets full. If this feature was available and it was possible to both dedicate a pod to an account, and force an account to only use that pod, I would want requests to fail once this pod is full. When I said the following with regards

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

To do so you can use a specific service offerring. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 5, 2016, at 7:14 AM, cs user wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > Thanks for responding. It is possible to force them to only be able to use > that pod however? > > So that when the create a machine,

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

That is a good question. Sorry I have not seen your first email. I have just read it now. I noticed you already tried dedicating a POD to an account. I am curious by what you meant with: "When the account selects this service offering, the instance is created on an empty host. Addition instances

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi Rafael, Thanks for responding. It is possible to force them to only be able to use that pod however? So that when the create a machine, these machines are forced to launch in that pod. Cheers On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

[UPDATE] this is the API method that you could use: https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.9/apis/dedicatePod.html On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain. > Have you tried that? > > On

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain. Have you tried that? On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, cs user wrote: > Hi All, > > I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version > of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi All, I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a particular pod? Cheers! On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, cs user wrote: > Hi All, > > Question regarding dedicating a Pod

Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi All, Question regarding dedicating a Pod to an account.. If I dedicate a Pod to an account, login as that account and then create an instance, when it comes to the affinity screen, I get the following: "Please select any affinity groups you want this VM to belong to" However, what I