2013/10/4 Luca Salvatore
> For it to be proper layer 2 over layer 3 the VMs in each zone would need
> to be on the same subnet. That way they can ARP for a VM in a different
> zone and traffic would use the GRE tunnel.
>
Ah... yes, sure.
--
N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
What I mean is that, the GRE tunnel is build between the XenServers OVS.
The XenSevers would need public IPs between them for connectivity over the
L3 network. This is normal for GRE end points.
However the VMs inside the XenServer don't know anything about the GRE.
For it to be proper layer 2 ov
2013/10/4 Luca Salvatore
> So are you saying in version 4.1 it is currently not working? WHat
> version are the patches available in?
>
> Yes, I'm working on sdnextensions branch, which are not merged to any
release branch.
> Any thoughts on how it will work between zones? E.g. Layer 2 over l
So are you saying in version 4.1 it is currently not working? WHat
version are the patches available in?
Any thoughts on how it will work between zones? E.g. Layer 2 over layer 3?
Should we assign the same Subnets to each zone?
--
Luca
On 4/10/13 11:19 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote:
>2013/10
2013/10/4 Luca Salvatore
>
> I want to overlay a layer 2 network across a layer 3 network, but just not
> sure how cloudstack does this. It doesn't seem to be working at the moment.
> Do I need to create some type of special network service offering to make
> this happen? The only 'virtual netw
I'm trying to test getting cloudstack 4.1 to build some GRE tunnels between
zones.
I have two zones and a Xen server in each. I have sdn.ovs.controller set to
true and separate physical interfaces configured for management traffic and GRE
traffic.
When I deploy a VM in each zone I can see inter
