RE: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-13 Thread Suresh Sadhu
[mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 1:48 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 Hi Martin, The public interface is supposed to be DOWN on the backup. Don’t ask me why this is designed l

Re: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-11 Thread Remi Bergsma
31.255 scope global eth2 > >So there's something going on with eth2, both are up, and also have the same >MAC address. The keepalived configurations seems to deal only with eth0. > >Thanks > >Martin > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schu