Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-27 Thread Will Stevens
tead of having ACS enforce its view > on how things should be done. Leave the templated network provisioning > procedures alone for where they fit, perhaps leave them as defaults, but > don’t enforce them or assume that everyone wants them. I don't think it is > safe to assume that &quo

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-24 Thread Paul Angus
chitect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] Sent: 24 February 2015 02:57 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE:

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-23 Thread Adrian Lewis
erre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: 24 February 2015 02:07 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) For voting on new features why not use the voting capability of Jira for new feature? at least it would give an idea if the

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-23 Thread Adrian Lewis
’t believe that more is necessarily needed, in fact less. Adrian -Original Message----- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 February 2015 07:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) The points raised are

Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-23 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
om: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 February 2015 07:08 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) > > The points raised are certainly valid from an enterprise networking > standpoint, an

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-23 Thread Paul Angus
-Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 February 2015 07:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) The points raised are certainly valid from an enterprise networking standpoint, and don'

Re: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-21 Thread Marcus
ieve you are looking for something like > Vyatta. > > Regards, > Somesh > > -----Original Message- > From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:50 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Network QoS (not band

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-21 Thread Somesh Naidu
] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) Tempted to suggest some sort of special interest group where networking people can have some input into the dev process despite not necessarily being able to produce any code

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-20 Thread Adrian Lewis
Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 February 2015 18:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting) I don't think we can. QoS in CS is mostly throttling traffic on the virtual interface. Regards, Somesh -

RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)

2015-02-20 Thread Somesh Naidu
I don't think we can. QoS in CS is mostly throttling traffic on the virtual interface. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: len.bellem...@alternativenetworks.com [mailto:len.bellem...@alternativenetworks.com] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 5:18 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org