RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-24 Thread David Ortiz
...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:31:20 + On 23-Apr-2013, at 2:12 AM, David Ortiz wrote: Hello, I am trying to setup a Windows AD server as a guest on my cloudstack cluster, and join my

Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread Shanker Balan
On 23-Apr-2013, at 2:12 AM, David Ortiz mailto:dpor...@outlook.com>> wrote: Hello, I am trying to setup a Windows AD server as a guest on my cloudstack cluster, and join my other guests to the domain it is serving using PowerBroker Identity Services Open. From what I am seeing, the virtual

RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread David Ortiz
rom: dpor...@outlook.com > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:28:10 -0400 > > Matt, > The ID of the network offering is 6. Here is what I tried so far. I > was able to get it

RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread David Ortiz
ix.com > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:59:20 + > > There is, I'll have to work on the SQL statement later today for you. > What's the ID of your network offering that you a

Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread Mathias Mullins
>disable dns on a network/virtual router that already exists, or would I >need to do this prior to creating the zone? >Thanks, David > >> From: mathias.mull...@citrix.com >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Rout

RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread David Ortiz
like it was probably the correct way > >to do it, but as far as I can tell would require me to start my zone from > >scratch, so I am trying to avoid that if possible. > >Thanks, David Ortiz > > > >> CC: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> From: aemne...

Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread Mathias Mullins
to set up a >network without DHCP and DNS seems like it was probably the correct way >to do it, but as far as I can tell would require me to start my zone from >scratch, so I am trying to avoid that if possible. >Thanks, David Ortiz > >> CC: users@cloudstack.apache.org &

RE: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread David Ortiz
Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:49:06 -0700 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Coming from someone that has no clue about active directory... If your using > a basic zone, why don't you have the AD server deployed outside of clouds

Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread Ahmad Emneina
Coming from someone that has no clue about active directory... If your using a basic zone, why don't you have the AD server deployed outside of cloudstack s control. Then point have your dns entries point to it. Have the default security group for guests open to the ports AD works on. Ahmad On

Re: Using different DNS for guests than Virtual Router

2013-04-23 Thread Murali Reddy
You can try with network offering with out DHCP and DNS services and control the guest instances to use AD as DNS/DHCP service provider. Please try out the steps outlined in [1]. [1] http://www.shapeblue.com/2012/05/10/using-the-api-for-advanced-network-mana gement/ On 23/04/13 2:12 AM, "David