, but
> > managment wants to get everything under one roof to have graphing of
> usage
> > trends.
> >
> > Basically the host statistics in CloudStack sent out to a 3rd party would
> > be great.
> >
> > Jeremy
> > ___
ere's, even custom SNMP checks for Ubinquity
>> AP's being down.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> From: Andrew Kirch
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:32 AM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re
eing down.
>
> Jeremy
>
> From: Andrew Kirch
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:32 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack - Monitoring
>
> I'm going to shamelessly plug Zenoss, we have ZenPacks for
checks for Ubinquity AP's being
down.
Jeremy
From: Andrew Kirch
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:32 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack - Monitoring
I'm going to shamelessly plug Zenoss, we have ZenPacks for both CloudSta
I'm going to shamelessly plug Zenoss, we have ZenPacks for both CloudStack,
and Xenserver which should give you deep monitoring of both.
I say shameless, because I am the Zenoss Community Manager.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jeremy Peterson
wrote:
> We are looking at a new monitoring softw
o have alerts in CloudStack setup that emails me on those issues, but
> > managment wants to get everything under one roof to have graphing of
> usage
> > trends.
> >
> > Basically the host statistics in CloudStack sent out to a 3rd party would
> > be great.
> >
one roof to have graphing of usage
> trends.
>
> Basically the host statistics in CloudStack sent out to a 3rd party would
> be great.
>
> Jeremy
>
> From: Stephan Seitz
> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 4:13 AM
> To: users@cloud
party would be
great.
Jeremy
From: Stephan Seitz
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 4:13 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack - Monitoring
We've added our acs infrastructure into our checkMK monitoring using the
agents (for XS we've installed
We've added our acs infrastructure into our checkMK monitoring using the
agents (for XS we've installed the CentOS rpm's) as well as SNMP. Works
reliable except we haven't written any checks for VM metrics so far.
Am Freitag, den 16.10.2015, 21:25 + schrieb Jeremy Peterson:
> We are looking at
"users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Asunto: Re: Cloudstack monitoring
The devops community is big on open source monitoring tools.
You might want to check this post:
http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/love-moni
de 2014 1:53 p.m.
> Para: "users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Asunto: Re: Cloudstack monitoring
>
> My organization uses Zenoss as our monitoring solution. We leverage the good,
> but h
lto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Asunto: Re: Cloudstack monitoring
My organization uses Zenoss as our monitoring solution. We leverage the good,
but horribly documented, API to automate the addition/deletion of new
VM’s/devices. Minimizing the management requirements of the monitoring
solution. Asid
My organization uses Zenoss as our monitoring solution. We leverage the good,
but horribly documented, API to automate the addition/deletion of new
VM’s/devices. Minimizing the management requirements of the monitoring
solution. Aside from Zenoss, Zabbix, Nagios, and Pandora are all good choices
13 matches
Mail list logo
