Re: Different selection of rootDiskController for VirtIO

2024-12-09 Thread Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid
Yep done that and virtio_scsi did work. I've now loaded the virtio_blk drivers to Rocky Linux and it can boot properly. On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 18:51, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi, > > Can you update the OS type of template (for new vm) or Stopped vm to "Other > PV (Virtio-SCSI)" and retry ? > > -Wei > >

Re: Different selection of rootDiskController for VirtIO

2024-12-09 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi, Can you update the OS type of template (for new vm) or Stopped vm to "Other PV (Virtio-SCSI)" and retry ? -Wei On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:42 AM Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid < hanisirfan.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've posted almost the same question on Rocky Linux forum here: > > https://f

Re: Different selection of rootDiskController for VirtIO

2024-12-09 Thread Nux
cool. Rocky uses dracut with -H switch by default ("host only" drivers), Ubuntu apparently doesn't although I remember at some point there was a thing about optimizing it as well, perhaps it's just an option. It can be worked around, but as I said, better to keep it "lean and mean" and just add

Re: Different selection of rootDiskController for VirtIO

2024-12-09 Thread Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid
I've posted almost the same question on Rocky Linux forum here: https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/rocky-linux-9-5-vm-with-virtio-not-booting-up/16773 Just to squeeze the tiny performance improvement, I will use virtio_blk but still install virtio_scsi driver for compatibility. Heard that Ubuntu mi

Re: Different selection of rootDiskController for VirtIO

2024-12-09 Thread Nux
virtio-scsi is pretty good in most cases, even recommended in some situations, as it's a proper SCSI implementation, so there shouldn't be major issues there. virtio-blk is generally faster, but you probably won't see the benefits in day to day ops unless you're doing hard core stuff. Problem