Re: IPv6 in Shared guest network

Op 06/12/2023 om 09:45 schreef Tobias Rehn: Hey Wido, thank you. That solves a lot of trouble in my head. :) The documentation is not that clear. IPv6 ist a must have for us We are using Juniper MX gear as gateways. I just have to check if we can do SLAAC with our current JUNOS version

RE: IPv6 in Shared guest network

: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:45 AM To: Wido den Hollander Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPv6 in Shared guest network Hey Wido, thank you. That solves a lot of trouble in my head. :) The documentation is not that clear. IPv6 ist a must have for us We are using Juniper MX gear

Re: IPv6 in Shared guest network

Hey Wido, thank you. That solves a lot of trouble in my head. :) The documentation is not that clear. IPv6 ist a must have for us We are using Juniper MX gear as gateways. I just have to check if we can do SLAAC with our current JUNOS version and setup as we are using EVPN+MPLS with all-active

Re: IPv6 in Shared guest network

Hi, Great to see you are deploying IPv6! Op 05/12/2023 om 16:05 schreef Tobias Rehn: Hey together, I am in the process of setting up IPv6 in a shared guest network. I have successfully added the network with both IPv4 and IPv6 address space. For IPv4 the whole thing is working perfectly but

Re: IPv6 error :: ACS 4.16.1

Op 08-04-2022 om 21:17 schreef Ranjit Jadhav: Thank you for your response, i was able to create IPv6 networks using both methods. It is showing IPv6 IP assigned to NIC as well in ACS. But not able to use it yet. VM was created using CentOS7. Do I need to manually add IPv6 ips in ifcfg-eth0?

Re: IPv6 error :: ACS 4.16.1

Thank you for your response, i was able to create IPv6 networks using both methods. It is showing IPv6 IP assigned to NIC as well in ACS. But not able to use it yet. VM was created using CentOS7. Do I need to manually add IPv6 ips in ifcfg-eth0? Any more guidance for actual integration with OS

Re: IPv6 error :: ACS 4.16.1

Op 28-03-2022 om 11:31 schreef Wei ZHOU: Hi Ranjit, Currently CloudStack virtual routers must configure an IPv4 address on each interface. Therefore you cannot create shared networks with only IPv6. However, the default network offering for shared networks supports dhcp/dns/userdata services

Re: IPv6 error :: ACS 4.16.1

Hi Ranjit, Currently CloudStack virtual routers must configure an IPv4 address on each interface. Therefore you cannot create shared networks with only IPv6. However, the default network offering for shared networks supports dhcp/dns/userdata services which requires a CloudStack VR. Solutions

Re: IPv6 dhcp problem

Op 11-08-2021 om 01:00 schreef Mustafa KALIR: Hello there, I installed Cloudstack System with Advanced Zone. And I defined IPv6. However, the centos 7 template I prepared does not pull the ipv6 information. How can i solve this problem. The below document does not work. Have you made

RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

them to the inside interfaces of the VRs. Cheers Alex -Original Message- From: Kristaps Cudars Sent: 12 August 2021 10:37 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks Hi Rohit, I think its excellent and satisfies all

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

all done! I create a domain record that points to my guest > VM IPv6 address a test webserver on > http://ipv6-isolated-ntwk-demo.yadav.cloud/ > > (Note: I'll get rid of the tunnel and request a new /48 block after a few > days, sharing this solely for testing purposes) > &g

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

ed36:1::/64 via dev > > * > ... and I enabled firewall rules to allow any traffic to pass for the new > /64 network > > And voila all done! I create a domain record that points to my guest > VM IPv6 address a test webserver on > http://ipv6-isolated-ntwk-demo.yadav

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

g purposes) Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 12:46 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks Op 19-07-2021 om 20:38 schreef Kristaps Cudars: > Hi Wido, > > I assume that flouting ip will not work grate with ingre

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

<mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> > Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> > <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > ma

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

own AS number > >>>>> - The peer's address(es) > >>>>> > >>>>> With FRR you can simply say: > >>>>> > >>>>> neighbor 2001:db8:4fa::179 remote-as external > >>>>

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

i.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>>; > Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl>

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

ex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi Wido, > >>> > That's pretty much in line with our thoughts, thanks > for > >>> the input. > >>> >

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

.matti...@shapeblue.com <mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>>> > Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> > <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com <mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav > mailt

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

ber on a per network basis (for > > bring your > > > own AS and IP scenario) > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Alex > > > >

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

blue.com>>>; Rohit Yadav >     mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com <mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>>; >     Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl> >     <mailto:gabr...@

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

he VR >> > - /64 per network >> > - SLACC for IP addressing >> > >> > I believe the next big question is then "on which level of ACS do we >> > manage AS numbers?". I see two options: >> > 1) Private AS number on a per-zone basis >&g

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

per-zone basis > > 2) Root Admin assigned AS number on a domain/account basis > > 3) End-user driven AS number on a per network basis (for bring your > > own AS and IP scenario) > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cheers > > Alex > > >

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

k.apache.org <mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Alex Mattioli mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>> Cc: Wei Zhou mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>>; Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>; Gabriel Beims Bräscher mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl>> Subject: Re: IPV6 in

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

NAT66? Or did I miss something? > > Regards, > Alex > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Hean Seng > Sent: 14 July 2021 16:44 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Wido den Hollander ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Wei > Zhou ; Rohit Yadav ;

RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

work basis (for bring your > own AS and IP scenario) > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > Alex > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander > Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli > > Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Y

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

S > and IP scenario) > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > Alex > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander > Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli > Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

RE: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

- From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Yadav ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks On 7/7/21 1:16 PM, Alex Mattioli wrote: > Hi all, > @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@sh

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

Yes, I means changing ipv6. Adding secondary IP, seems not adding second IPv6 also . For my case now, the IPv6 ad MAC is not the same also : MAC: link/ether 1e:00:0d:00:01:ec brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff IPV6; inet6 x:x:x:x:1c00:dff:fe00:1ec/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

On 5/1/21 8:48 AM, Hean Seng wrote: > Hi Wido > > The issue solved . Need to configure ra in router vlan. Previously we > set "ipv6 nd ra suppress" ， for other systems to work, after change to > Cloudstack, it need to remove this and make it have announcement of IPv6 to > VM. > Yes. The

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

Hi Wido The issue solved . Need to configure ra in router vlan. Previously we set "ipv6 nd ra suppress" ， for other systems to work, after change to Cloudstack, it need to remove this and make it have announcement of IPv6 to VM. By the way, This way of configuring IPv6, if IPv6 need to

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

Can you check with tcpdump on the host and sniff the vnetX device of the VM to see if you ICMPv6 packages reach the VM? Security Grouping with IPv6 works with KVM, so it has to be a configuration issue somewhere. Wido On 4/30/21 8:59 PM, Hean Seng wrote: > Hi > > I am using 4.15 , hypervisor

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

Hi I am using 4.15 , hypervisor is ubuntu 18 , KVM , yes, I am on advance with SG I set the Security Group: ICMP -1 -1 ::/0 But seems still cannot ping the VM. Or even add in rules for ALL All . All ::/0 Seems not able to PING. After configure , this is the rules in

Re: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

We using share network, on Security Group, KVM . On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 6:28 PM Alex Mattioli wrote: > Hi Hean, > > What type of network and hypervisor are you using? Also, which version of > ACS? > > Regards, > Alex > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Hean Seng > Sent: 30 April

RE: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack

Hi Hean, What type of network and hypervisor are you using? Also, which version of ACS? Regards, Alex -Original Message- From: Hean Seng Sent: 30 April 2021 08:34 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack Hi I setup the IPv6 in VM. Outbound form VM is

Re: IPv6 Support

Hi Gabriel. For this case, : n such a network setup it is possible to deploy multiple shared guest networks, isolated via VLAN/VXLAN. These networks can be configured with only IPv4 addresses, or IPv4 + IPv6; on the second case the IPv4 address could be a either a private IP (e.g. 10.1.1.1) or a

Re: IPv6 Support

For ipv6 implementation for Advancezone with NAT, i guess shall be allocate a ipv6 /64 subnet to it (the Virtual Router), and VirtualRouter allocate IPv6 to VM under it. So cloudstack shall allow add ipv6 /64 subnet to the zone , and when VM created , it will assign a /64 subnet to VR, and VR

Re: IPv6 Support

I might get a bit redundant here, but here follows my 2 cents on IPv6 + CloudStack. Andrija is right. IPv6 works on Zones with Advanced Network + Security Groups + KVM. The documentation [1] also raised support provided by XenServer, but to be honest I have no experience with IPv6 + XenServer to

Re: IPv6 Support

On 11/11/2020 2:01 AM, Hean Seng wrote: IPv6 do not have NAT , each VM suppose to have indiviual Ipv6 Address. NAT66 does in fact exist, and the virtual routers used for VLANs could in fact be configured with RADV to provide an IETF RFC4193 SLAAC prefix to private VPC networks then use NAT66

Re: IPv6 Support

IPv6 do not have NAT , each VM suppose to have indiviual Ipv6 Address. For NAT zone, is that any way to allocate IPv6 subnet ? On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:51 PM Andrija Panic wrote: > If not mistaken, ipv6 is only supported for Shared Networks, and not for > Isolated/VPC networks. > > On

Re: IPv6 Support

If not mistaken, ipv6 is only supported for Shared Networks, and not for Isolated/VPC networks. On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 04:31, Hean Seng wrote: > Hi > > Is that anyone have a idea of best way implementing ipv6 in cloudstack ? > > I saw the doc, and mentioned create another SharedGuestNework in >

Re: IPv6

Have you checked whether there is a Jira issue raised for it? From: uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of Mindaugas Milinavicius Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:53 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:

RE: IPv6

Original Message- From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mindaugas Milinavicius Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:47 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPv6 i will integrate ipv6 in next week Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARN

Re: IPv6

i will integrate ipv6 in next week Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARNITA Direktorius http://www.clustspace.com LT: +37068882880 RU: +7913933 Tomorrow's possibilities today - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00) - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€

Re: IPv6

Marty, I know some folks in Europe are using v6, but I'm not sure to what degree. We haven't started looking at it yet, but we will at some point. - Si From: Marty Godsey Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:48 PM To:

Re: IPv6 support for ESXi?

Hugo, Do you know the status of IPv6 ? On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Octavian Popescu octavian.pope...@interoute.com wrote: Hi, Is there any IPv6 support in CS for ESXi hypervisors? I've read the documentation but only KVM and Xen are mentioned so I was wondering if this will change in

Re: IPv6 Prefix

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Soeren Malchow soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote: Dear all, is it possible that Cloudstack 4.4 can only use /64 prefixes for Ipv6 ? We are trying to use /96 prefixes and it complains exactly about that. If that is only a frontend thing, can we type in /64 and