On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 06:44:12PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > > Any other way on how to console in to the newly created VM other than
> > using
> > > the console proxy method? Unlike system VM, the instance VM doesn't give
> > > any link local address which I can SSH directly from the KVM host
Hi Prasanna,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:45:34PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > Hi Prasanna and all,
> >
> > I managed to work out on how to assign public IP to the VM instance using
> >
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:45:34PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Prasanna and all,
>
> I managed to work out on how to assign public IP to the VM instance using
> static NAT.
>
> However, I am still stuck with the console proxy time-out issue. It seems
> that my problem is exactly the one ment
Hi Prasanna and all,
I managed to work out on how to assign public IP to the VM instance using
static NAT.
However, I am still stuck with the console proxy time-out issue. It seems
that my problem is exactly the one mentioned on this bug reported to JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CL
Hi Prasanna and all,
I managed to create a VM instance using the NFS primary storage (not using
the RBD primary storage due to the bug we discussed on another thread).
However, there is no public IP being assigned to the VM instance (unlike
the system VMs which are getting public IPs). How do I a
Hi Prasanna,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:25:35PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > Hi Prasanna,
> >
> > Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
> >
> Were you able to get beyond this error?
>
Yes. I managed to get around the net
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:25:35PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Prasanna,
>
> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
>
Were you able to get beyond this error?
> Yesterday I troubleshooted further and found out that the mapping of the
> bridge is incorrect. For example, eth1 of the S
Hi Prasanna,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Yesterday I troubleshooted further and found out that the mapping of the
bridge is incorrect. For example, eth1 of the SSVM, which is supposed to be
private network interface for communication with management server, is
being mapped to
See Inline,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 05:12:25PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> Noted, can't wait for 4.2 to be released. :)
>
> Dear Prasanna, Wido and all,
>
> I just realised that while the system VMs are running, they are still not
> accessible through the public IPs assigned to t
-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:12 AM
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
Subject: Re: Problem in adding Ceph RBD as primary storage for CloudStack 4.1.0
Hi Wido,
Noted, can't wait for 4.2 to be released. :)
Hi Wido,
Noted, can't wait for 4.2 to be released. :)
Dear Prasanna, Wido and all,
I just realised that while the system VMs are running, they are still not
accessible through the public IPs assigned to them. I have been waiting for
the SSVM to download the default CentOS template and it doesn't
On 07/12/2013 10:14 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
Hi Prasanna,
I managed to fix the problem, thanks for your advice to turn the agent
log level to debug:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/KVM+agent+debug
From the log, I found out that the agent on the KVM host tried to NFS
mou
Hi Prasanna,
I managed to fix the problem, thanks for your advice to turn the agent log
level to debug:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/KVM+agent+debug
>From the log, I found out that the agent on the KVM host tried to NFS mount
directly to 103.25.200.19:/mnt/vol1/sec-stor
Hi Prasanna,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Yes, the cloudstack-agent service is running on both the KVM hosts. There
is no "cloud" user being created though, when I installed the agent. I
installed the agent as root.
root@hv-kvm-01:/home/indra# service cloudstack-agent status
Indeed, cloudstack will go through the allocation to startup the
system VMs too. So that process is failing to recognize the volume
(.qcow2) present on your NFS storage.
Can you check if your cloudstack agent service is running with the KVM
host? And it should've created the user cloud. $id cloud
Hi Prasanna,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Yes, when I export the NFS, I set the permission so that normal user will
be able to have read/write access to the files (no_root_squash).
I have tested and I can have read/write access from my KVM hosts using
normal user. BTW, there's
Can you access the file as user root? Or user cloud? The cloudstack
agent on your KVM host runs as user cloud and the NFS permissions
might be disallowing the volume (.qcow2) from being accessed.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:16:41PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Prasanna,
>
> Good day to you, an
Hi Prasanna,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Yes, the file exists. I can access the file from the management server and
the two hypervisors hosts if I mount manually.
[root@cs-nas-01 /mnt/vol1/sec-storage/template/tmpl/1/3]# ls
-la
total
1418787
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel
Can you check whether there is a file at:
nfs://103.25.200.19/mnt/vol1/sec-storage/template/tmpl/1/3/
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 01:59:34PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Prasanna,
>
> Thanks for your e-mail.
>
> I have tried restarting the management server, and the problem still
> persists. I e
Hi Prasanna,
Thanks for your e-mail.
I have tried restarting the management server, and the problem still
persists. I even tried to re-do the installation and configuration again
from scratch last night, but the problem still there.
I also noted that on the beginning of the logs, I found some er
It looks like a previous attempt to start the systemVMs has failed
putting the nfs storage in the avoid set. Did you try restarting your
management server?
This line leads me to the above mentioned:
2013-07-12 13:10:48,236 DEBUG [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
(secstorage-1:null)
Dear Wido and all,
I have managed to get the hosts, primary and secondary storage running.
- 2 KVM hypervisor hosts
- One RBD primary storage
- One NFS primary storage (for system VMs, since I understand that system
VMs cannot use RBD)
- One NFS secondary storage
However, now I am having problem
Hi Wido,
Thanks for the advice, I'm now able to add the RBD pool as primary storage.
Many thanks! :)
Cheers.
On Thursday, July 11, 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/10/2013 03:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> Cc'ing Wido, our resident Ceph expert. ;-)
>>
>>
> Hehe ;)
>
> On Wed
Hi,
On 07/10/2013 03:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Cc'ing Wido, our resident Ceph expert. ;-)
Hehe ;)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:45:25PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
Dear all,
I am installing CloudStack 4.1.0 (upgraded from 4.0.2) and I also have a
Ceph cluster running. However, I am having
Dear all,
Any advise? I have tried to uninstall and reinstall cloudstack-management
on the management server, as well as the cloudstack-agent on the
hypervisors. The problem still persists.
When I try to add primary storage from the Cloudstack GUI, is the adding
process performed by the managemen
Cc'ing Wido, our resident Ceph expert. ;-)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:45:25PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am installing CloudStack 4.1.0 (upgraded from 4.0.2) and I also have a
> Ceph cluster running. However, I am having issues in adding the RBD as
> primary storage. Tried to f
26 matches
Mail list logo
