Re: Replace VR

2019-12-04 Thread Erik Weber
It's been quite a while since I worked on CloudStack but I think you may be able to achieve your goal with a shared network. You'll loose much of the built-in network flexibility in CloudStack, but that is most likely also the point. -- Erik On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:12 PM Andrija Panic wrote: >

Re: Replace VR

2019-12-03 Thread Andrija Panic
That's true. You can experiment with Dedicating a host to the customer. I can't advise (from top of my head) if also the customer's VR will be created there (but you can do one-time live migrate if needed to that host) - all customer VMs will be created on this host while there are free resources

Re: Replace VR

2019-12-03 Thread Alessandro Caviglione
Yes, I thought about your idea, but I would not introduce too many hops... in addition I cannot manage Public IPs directly from Barracuda VA. Is there a kind of parameter I can configure to deploy all costumer's instance on tha same VR's host? On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:57 PM Andrija Panic wrote:

Re: Replace VR

2019-12-03 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi, it's not possible to completely replace (i.e. not without complete ACS code base change), but you might want to see if the following helps: - Assign one or more (as required, one at minimum) additional Public IPs on the VR, and then configure Static Nat from that Public IP to the internal