> From: hossein zabolzadeh
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 4:19 PM
> Subject: Re: XMPP Server on CloudStack Management Server
>
>
> Yes you right.
> Thank for your aims.
> I will check with them, and come back to this thread later.
&g
with the hypervisors,
but Archipel uses agents with XML-based messaging.
If you find out more, please share.
Thanks.
Amin
From: hossein zabolzadeh
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: XMPP Server on Cloud
I talked with the archipel community members.
They use XMPP for event/precense and real time-itivity.
So I have another question from you and other cloudstack community members:
Is the cloudstack events are real time? or not, it has some delay to be
published? If yes, why XMPP becomes matter?
On
Yes you right.
Thank for your aims.
I will check with them, and come back to this thread later.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
> Those are great questions for their mailing list.
>
> No one here knows about archipelproject, i just gave you a reference.
>
> -Sebastien
Those are great questions for their mailing list.
No one here knows about archipelproject, i just gave you a reference.
-Sebastien
> On 3 Jun 2014, at 21:57, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
>
> Hi Sebgoa.
> I didn't want to compare XMPP and virtualization. I want to know why using
> XMPP comes into
Hi Sebgoa.
I didn't want to compare XMPP and virtualization. I want to know why using
XMPP comes into somebody's Mind?(Archipel Community) They wanted to satisfy
which feature that was not and currently is not addressed in cloudstack
and/or other CMPs(e.g. OpenStack, OpenNebula, ...)?
Which problem
On Jun 3, 2014, at 6:31 PM, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
> Is there any idea, about "*XMPP over virtualization*" advantages(Added
> values)?
Hossein, that question does not make any sense to me. XMPP is a protocol for
messaging and presence.
You can't compare XMPP and virtualization.
> What the
Is there any idea, about "*XMPP over virtualization*" advantages(Added
values)?
What the ArchipelProject is looking for?
Sebastien, what do you think?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:11 PM, hossein zabolzadeh
> wrote:
>
> > Intresting.
> > Can you explain
On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:11 PM, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
> Intresting.
> Can you explain exactly what new feature the archipelproject is
> delivered(By the aim of XMPP) that the current cloudstack can not do?
> I want to know the exact role of the XMPP and the added value provided by
> this instanc
Intresting.
Can you explain exactly what new feature the archipelproject is
delivered(By the aim of XMPP) that the current cloudstack can not do?
I want to know the exact role of the XMPP and the added value provided by
this instance messaging protocol in a virtualization era.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014
You could definitely use xmpp as command and control in your instances.
This has been done before :
http://archipelproject.org
You could write xmpp hooks to call the cloudstack api as well
I used to be involved in this project:
https://github.com/legastero/Kestrel
Which allowed you to run batch
@David
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 01.06.2014 10:21, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
>
>> @David
>> AMQP is not instance messaging. Does the cloudstack use AMPQ for its
>> message passing mechanism?
>>
>
> http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/16/tapping-into-
> apache-
On 01.06.2014 10:21, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
@David
AMQP is not instance messaging. Does the cloudstack use AMPQ for its
message passing mechanism?
http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/16/tapping-into-apache-cloudstack-events-via-amqp.html
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg techno
@David
AMQP is not instance messaging. Does the cloudstack use AMPQ for its
message passing mechanism? I think AMPQ is what the openStack use.
@Matthew
Can you explain more about your idea? How cloudstack API can help me to
implement this new way of message passing?
Thanks in advance.
On Sun, Jun
This would be ideal and cool; for every vm instance id could have their own
JID and the implementation api features of cloudstack implemented in on the
event/presence system.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:04 AM, hossein zabolzadeh
wrote:
> Hi again.
> I want to add instance messaging system to th
AMQP?
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:04 AM, hossein zabolzadeh
wrote:
> Hi again.
> I want to add instance messaging system to the cloudstack management server
> architecture, to provide online chat capability with my VMs. I wrote a
> simple agent to be installed on every VMs, to provide chatting mech
Would be easier to come with suggestions if you said a bit more about what
exactly you are trying to accomplish.
Erik
31. mai 2014 15:04 skrev "hossein zabolzadeh"
følgende:
> Hi again.
> I want to add instance messaging system to the cloudstack management server
> architecture, to provide onlin
17 matches
Mail list logo
