anyone. Please contact the sender if you
believe you have received this email in error.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 December 2015 01:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack UI through accelerator/cache/proxy
I too use Net
I too use NetScaler and I actually found compression to have more of an
impact than caching. Caching probably didn't help as much due to the jQuery
stuff.
On Dec 10, 2015 8:30 PM, "Nux!" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running something like this without issues using mr Kinsella's
> instructions for a
Hi,
I've been running something like this without issues using mr Kinsella's
instructions for a good while now.
http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/
I've seen visible improvements in performance, at least with the version we
have in production (4.4).
HTH
Lucian
--
S
ors, virus, interception or
interference.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 10 December 2015 1:26 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack UI through accelerator/cache/proxy
The only thing you could cache as far as I can see
The only thing you could cache as far as I can see is static content (js,
css, pictures) and list calls.
Anything that triggers an action has to reach the mgmt server and cannot be
cached.
When caching list calls you have to either have a really short lifespan, or
a proper method of invalidating t
