Hello All
When using the Cloud Stack Virtual Router function to connect to Remote Access
VPN (L2TP) and perform CIFS file transfer or copy and paste files in a remote
desktop connection, I am facing an issue where the transfer speed is extremely
low.
I first suspected the physical router
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Remote Access VPN
traffic route
@cdfgallo
AFAIK this is a known limitation of L2TP VPN
You can delete the default route and add some custom routes if needed
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9272
)
Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: Christian Reichert
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022, 11:11 AM
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: Remote Access VPN
Hi All,
we setup Remote Access VPN on a VPC like descript in the
Hi All,
we setup Remote Access VPN on a VPC like descript in the current documentation
for 4.16.1.0 but our Windows Test Client is not connecting.
Is there any way to debug the VPN configuration?
Thanks and best regards,
Christian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DKIM Fail] Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN
provider
Hi PL,
You can check the ikev2 support in 4.15+ here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4953
I think a generic VPN framework-provider feature is probably what we need (i.e.
to let user or
package is available on Debian:
https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/openvpn
Regards.
From: Pierre-Luc Dion
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 20:10
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN prov
estarts (with cleanup). I think a process like this
> could
> >> be simpler than what we've right now, and the ovpn download+import
> workflow
> >> would be easier than what we'll get from either strongswan/current or
> >> wireguard. While I like the simpli
n't mind doing setup on individual VMs (much like setting up
>> ssh key) or use something like TailScale.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> From: Gabriel Bräscher
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
>> To: dev
&g
doing setup on individual VMs (much like setting up
> ssh key) or use something like TailScale.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Gabriel Bräscher
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
> To: dev
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Ope
g up ssh key) or use something like TailScale.
Regards.
From: Gabriel Bräscher
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 19:28
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
I understand that OpenVPN is a great option and far a
e office
> > > sharing a
> > > > client-side public IP/nat while trying to connect to a VPC or an
> > isolated
> > > > network) and for these reasons many users actually deploy pfSense or
> > > setup
> > > > a OpenVPN server in their iso
but we've moved away
from it a while ago because it was not reliable, connection kept
dropping, support only one windows client at a time, issue configuring
clients, no helpful connection logs..
An interesting improvement is made to remote access VPN, would be to
optionally use dns resoluti
ead.
> >
> > Therefore for the point-to-point VPN use-case of remote access [1] does
> it
> > make sense to switch to OpenVPN? Or, are there users using
> > strongswan/ipsec/l2tpd for remote access VPN?
> >
> > A general-purpose VPN-framework/provider
deploy pfSense or setup
> a OpenVPN server in their isolated network or VPC and use that instead.
>
> Therefore for the point-to-point VPN use-case of remote access [1] does it
> make sense to switch to OpenVPN? Or, are there users using
> strongswan/ipsec/l2tpd for remote access VPN?
>
iginal Message-
> > > From: Rohit Yadav
> > > Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
&
OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote
; -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
>
> All,
>
> We've historically supported openswan and nowadays
+1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
All,
We've historically supported ope
Hey!
I’m personally a strong proponent of Wireguard. A couple years back,
implementing a S2S or remote-access VPN with WG was complicated and it still is
- but there’s definitely more tooling available these days. There are clients
for just about every major platform - desktop and mobile.
In
tup a OpenVPN server in their isolated
network or VPC and use that instead.
Therefore for the point-to-point VPN use-case of remote access [1] does it make
sense to switch to OpenVPN? Or, are there users using strongswan/ipsec/l2tpd
for remote access VPN?
A general-purpose VPN-framework/provider
Brian,
The link you sent is private. Have you seen any exceptions in the logs?
either on the client or in the VR.
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:17 PM Brian Fitzpatrick <
b.fitzpatr...@chester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to setup Remote Access VPN on an DefaultIsolatedSour
--Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic andrija%20panic%20%3candrija.pa...@gmail.com%3e>>
> Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> To: users users%20%3cus...@cloudstack.apache.org%3e>>
> Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN
> D
lto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
To: users
mailto:users%20%3cus...@cloudstack.apache.org%3e>>
Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 23:30:46 +0200
CAUTION !
This email originated outside of the University of Chester. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you recognise the s
lt;
> b.fitzpatr...@chester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> **Apologies not sure this was originally posted**
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to setup Remote Access VPN on an DefaultIsolatedSourceNAT
>> network
>>
>> I have created the VPN and a VPN
> I am trying to setup Remote Access VPN on an DefaultIsolatedSourceNAT
> network
>
> I have created the VPN and a VPN user and pasted the shared key into a
> Windows client but I am getting an error stating
>
> the L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encount
**Apologies not sure this was originally posted**
Hi all,
I am trying to setup Remote Access VPN on an DefaultIsolatedSourceNAT network
I have created the VPN and a VPN user and pasted the shared key into a Windows
client but I am getting an error stating
the L2TP connection attempt failed
Hi all,
I am trying to setup Remote Access VPN on an DefaultIsolatedSourceNAT network
I have created the VPN and a VPN user and pasted the shared key into a Windows
client but I am getting an error stating
the L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a
processing
OK thanks but here is the next problem with that I am getting a SQL script
error when trying to upgrade to 4.2.1. The problem is with the
schema410to420.SQL script. Have you seen issues with that before? I will
get the exact table later.
On Feb 18, 2014 3:41 AM, "Nux!" wrote:
> On 17.02.2014 20:
major bug is discovered.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 18 February 2014 08:41
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where is Remote Access vpn settings.
On 17.02.2014 20:35, Jason Villalta wrote:
> It is almost like my UI is behind even though I upgra
On 17.02.2014 20:35, Jason Villalta wrote:
It is almost like my UI is behind even though I upgraded to 4.1.1 a
few
months ago so I would except this UI to be there.
I do not know when the VPN feature was introduced, but you certainly
are behind, the current version is 4.2.1 and 4.3 is not ver
> private vpn client addresses.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> On 17.02.2014 19:00, Jason Villalta wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am trying to setup remote access vpn in cloudstack for users to vpn
>&g
with l2tp
installed. That went ok and I can connect but I cannot route to the l2tp
private vpn client addresses.
Thanks for your help.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 17.02.2014 19:00, Jason Villalta wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I am trying to setup remote access vpn
On 17.02.2014 19:00, Jason Villalta wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to setup remote access vpn in cloudstack for users to vpn
into
their VPC but I do not see the option to enable remote access vpn.
Where
is it located. Site-to-Site vpn is currently working fine.
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs
Hello,
I am trying to setup remote access vpn in cloudstack for users to vpn into
their VPC but I do not see the option to enable remote access vpn. Where
is it located. Site-to-Site vpn is currently working fine.
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html
34 matches
Mail list logo
