Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-21 Thread Chip Childers
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:48:31PM -0500, Nick Wales wrote: > Thanks for the help. Turned out exports were not configured for the SSVM's > management IP. > > Is it usual practise to enable exports to the entire mgmt IP address space? Yes, you should do that. The IP's for a SSVM may / will be dif

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Wales
Thanks for the help. Turned out exports were not configured for the SSVM's management IP. Is it usual practise to enable exports to the entire mgmt IP address space? On 20 June 2013 04:22, Dave Dunaway wrote: > W! high-five! :P > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Nitin Mehta > wrote: >

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-20 Thread Dave Dunaway
W! high-five! :P On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Dave - Good suggestion. Had been at the back of my mind, but didn't file > an enhancement for it yet. > So filed CLOUDSTACK-3090 for this. > > Thanks, > -Nitin > > On 20/06/13 2:20 PM, "Dave Dunaway" wrote: > > >4:40am

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-20 Thread Nitin Mehta
Dave - Good suggestion. Had been at the back of my mind, but didn't file an enhancement for it yet. So filed CLOUDSTACK-3090 for this. Thanks, -Nitin On 20/06/13 2:20 PM, "Dave Dunaway" wrote: >4:40am moment of lucidity add the ability to the 'Infrastrucutre >Secondary Storage' view to run

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-20 Thread Dave Dunaway
4:40am moment of lucidity add the ability to the 'Infrastrucutre Secondary Storage' view to run the ssvm-check.sh on a SSVM. Click a button and have it run the diagnostic and present some purty output. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > +1 on what Dave said. Run the scrip

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-19 Thread Nitin Mehta
+1 on what Dave said. Run the script ssvm-check.sh inside SSVM and this will check this along with other stuff. It should be able to tell you if you coulnt mount the disk. More info @ https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-troubleshooting.html On 20/06/13 5:18 AM, "Dave Dunaway" wrote: >Sounds

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-19 Thread Dave Dunaway
Sounds like your SSVM is not mounting your NFS storage. If you look at your SSVM, I believe you'll find the the hard drive to be 2gigs. Which is what the dashboard is reporting. Log in, check that the SSVM has mounted your NFS storage. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Nick Wales wrote: > I ha

Re: Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-19 Thread Nick Wales
I have this very same problem. Except mine shows 1.92GB when it is ~1TB. I can make snapshots just fine though and I uploaded an ISO yesterday. On 18 June 2013 09:40, Enric Muñoz wrote: > Hi, > > I have a secondary storage, which is a whole hard disk of 3 TB. I do a NFS > share with it but the

Storage capacity not well recognised

2013-06-18 Thread Enric Muñoz
Hi, I have a secondary storage, which is a whole hard disk of 3 TB. I do a NFS share with it but the cloudstack dashboard says that my secondary storage capacity is 1.97 GB (GB instead of TB). Therefore, when it downloads the CentOS template it appears an error telling this: Failed post downlo