t;> setup/install such as in case of Windows VMs, you could use a RDP
>> client
>> such as the Microsoft remote desktop app on the client side. In my
>> experience, RDP client with guest VMs have better performance and I/O
>> (webcam, microphone, speaker) than compared wit
cpvm agent (reverse proxy) -> secured accessed your browser (in case of
> > SSL enabled CPVM)
> >
> > In the latter (case with CloudStack), there is a double
> > encryption/decryption that happens on the CPVM side on both sides.
> >
> >
> > Rega
he CPVM side on both sides.
Regards.
From: Murilo Moura
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 16:22
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: noVNC performance
Hi Yadav!
Yes, I even made this comparison with the same server where I was
running
Proxmox before. As for the client, I
CPVM side on both sides.
Regards.
From: Murilo Moura
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 16:22
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: noVNC performance
Hi Yadav!
Yes, I even made this comparison with the same server where I was running
Proxmox before. As
, speaker) than compared with VNC (noVNC).
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Murilo Moura
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 08:23
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: noVNC performance
>
> Is there any instruction to optimize the performance of the graphical
>
mance and I/O (webcam, microphone,
speaker) than compared with VNC (noVNC).
Regards.
From: Murilo Moura
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 08:23
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: noVNC performance
Is there any instruction to optimize the performance o
Is there any instruction to optimize the performance of the graphical
console via noVNC? For virtual machines with desktop enabled, the
performance of the noVNC console is very low.
I came from experience with Proxmox and in it the noVNC console, even
protected by SSL, is much superior. That's why
