Hi Sanjeev,
The F5 was added after I installed cloudstack
This vlan was not existing at 1.1 before I added the F5 to cloudstack but I
will try it again, just to be sure
Bjoern
On Sunday, November 10, 2013, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
>
> From the log it looks like you are using 1.1 as
Hi,
In basiczone setup, i installed csp in xenserver 6.2 (64bit). Let i know
xenserver 6.2 contain inbuilt csp packge.
I received following error:
[root@xen1 ~]# tar xf xenserver-cloud-supp.tgz
[root@xen1 ~]# xe-install-supplemental-pack xenserver-cloud-supp.iso
Error: unsatisfied dependency
Hi Prakash,
XenServer6.2 comes with CSP inbuilt. If you want to use it for basic zone just
change the switch network backend to bridge mode.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: prak...@assistanz.com [mailto:prak...@assistanz.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:34 PM
To: users@c
Hi Prakash,
To enable bridge mode, run the following command
xe-switch-network-backend bridge
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@
Hi,
I have just installed ACS 4.2 on Centos 6.4 using the repo:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ for POC purposes (like the DevCloud
but on Centos)
On first startup, I am using the Launch wizard to setup a Basic Zone with a
KVM host (both KVM and NFS running on management server). The wizar
Hi,
How do you create instance?As the concept of LXC is different from
kvm,and it never use the template that contains a complete OS.So,I
think we should change the way we usually think.You can reference
this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LXC+Support+in+Cloudstack#
--
Hello,
Did you add the primary as a preconfigured ?
Or choosing the NFS as a primary storage ?
Also find this words
KVM supports "Shared Mountpoint" storage. A shared mountpoint is a file
system path local to each server in a given cluster. The path must be the
same across all Hosts in the clust
Nikolay,
Getting back to this, did you file a bug for it ?
http://issues.apache.org select the CLOUDSTACK project
that way we can track it and make sure it's indeed a bug and that it gets fixed.
thanks,
-sebastien
On Oct 11, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Nikolay Kabadjov wrote:
> Short update:
> It t
I'll put in a ticket now. :)
On 11/9/13, 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Hey David, Andrija,
Did you guys make an jira ticket for this? It sounds like something
Schuberg Philis wants as well. Let's discuss further.
Daan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Also having the same
Yes I verified it and it happens still.
Can't add Vlans to an 11.4 LTM device, same error.
Bjoern
On Monday, November 11, 2013, BJO ERN wrote:
> Hi Sanjeev,
>
> The F5 was added after I installed cloudstack
> This vlan was not existing at 1.1 before I added the F5 to cloudstack but
> I will try
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue? I am having
identical problem with Ubuntu 12.04 kvm host and ACS 4.2.0.
Basically, I've got two clusters, cluster1 and cluster2. Cluster1 is using
centos 6.4 as kvm host and cluster2 uses ubuntu 12.04. I am planning to
decomm
Hello All ,
Sorry for this stupid question but i really wonder why KVM is used or trying
to use as a hypervisor option. (Sorry for out of scope of this list) but try
to learn people understandings, also i do not want to say do not use it :D
Mostly third party supported hypervisor is vmware
XenSer
Jake, what network card are you using? Is it a broadcom chip by any chance?
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: "Jake G."
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 11 November, 2013 4:44:16 AM
Subject: Networking issues when vRouter is on different host
Hi All,
I'm running Clo
Hi, I guess there is no need to to open a ticket.
http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830
2013/11/11 David Matteson
> I'll put in a ticket now. :)
>
>
> On 11/9/13, 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> Hey David, Andrija,
>>
>> Did you g
On 11.11.2013 16:24, Vahric Muhtaryan wrote:
Hello All ,
Sorry for this stupid question but i really wonder why KVM is used or
trying
to use as a hypervisor option. (Sorry for out of scope of this list)
but try
to learn people understandings, also i do not want to say do not use
it :D
Mostly
See, if this is of any help for you:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
--Sanjay
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:47 PM
> To: users@cl
Great! This had been a long standing issue, and was finally fixed!
Domain admin's account privilege in the UI used to belie that mentioned in
documentation and API-doc.
---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Resear
I can only speak for me why we are moving to KVM.
It starts with license costs which will be an issue once you have several
hundred hosts like I have.
Going on we were a big "Citrix" Xen shop but after issues with Citrix
Xenserver 6 (XCP variant) like openvswitch performance issues, XAPI
communicat
Secondary storage is managed by system VM.
Try to read this guide and follow the advices given for every possible problem:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
In my case ssvm-check.sh shows that everything is correct, but SSVM
Hey!
I use CS 4.2 and XenServer 6.2
I have had this issue several times: If the host fails, Cloudstack does not
take notice. It thinks the host and the system VMs are still running.
Cloudstack ignoring a complete host failure does concern me in the long run but
no that much for now.
The problem
Hey!
I use CS 4.2 and XenServer 6.2
This is about primary local storage on the XS host. CS deletes
the Local Storage SR and creates a new one in its place with the UUID as
the name. That is fine but I still have to look up the SR UUID/name in
XenCenter and create the primary storage manually via
I have a couple issues with the current setup involving the virtual router.
1. I'm not using the VR for port forwarding / VPN / routing or anything
traffic related so it would seem to me to be relatively trivial to have a
secondary virtual router that just provides DNS, userdata & metadata. This
w
nfs://192.168.169.202:/secondary is not a valid nfs address.
You may have better luck with
nfs://192.168.169.202/secondary
On 11 November 2013 10:17, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue? I am having
> identical problem with Ubuntu
> Op 12 november 2013 om 0:07 schreef Nick Wales :
>
>
> I have a couple issues with the current setup involving the virtual router.
>
> 1. I'm not using the VR for port forwarding / VPN / routing or anything
> traffic related so it would seem to me to be relatively trivial to have a
> secondary
Hi,
When using the Launch Wizard it only gives the option of NFS for primary
storage - Shared Mountpoint is not offered. So I used NFS for primary
storage which results in the error above.
However, I can add Primary Storage using Shared Mountpoint from the
Infrastructure screen, but NFS fails. So
Thanks Lennert.
My issue isn't around the state of the VR as such, we've destroyed and
brought back plenty with no issue, more so the impact it going down will
have on my instances.
We're looking at consolidation ratios of 40 to 1 so Pods will have a large
number of instances.
We have been tryin
It was my mistype in the email. ACS has the right values and i've checked that
i can mount it from within the ssvm.
Any other ideas?
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Wales"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 11 November, 2013 11:12:34 PM
Subject: Re: agent not running
Hi!
So i figured out that it was due to MTU settings.
In order for the guest traffic on host`s physical NIC eth0.900 to traverse the
switch I had to reduce the MTU on the guest VM to 1496.
My guess is because the vlan tag 900 adds 4 bytes to the packets sent out the
host`s NIC eth0.900. My swit
Hi,
CS 4.2 on CentOS 6.4 with KVM.
I get the following error when trying to take a snapshot of a instance. Is this
function not available with KVM?
KVM Snapshot is not supported: 1
Thank you
First you need to set kvm.snapshot.enabled to true
After that you can make snapshots from volumes not the whole VM like ths vm
snapshot button would do (It does disk + memory which is not support in
KVM).
Just navigate to your volumes and use that snapshot function
Bye,
Bjoern
On Mon, Nov 11, 20
Bjoern,
That worked! Thank you
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:18 PM, BJO ERN wrote:
First you need to set kvm.snapshot.enabled to true
After that you can make snapshots from volumes not the whole VM like ths vm
snapshot button would do (It does disk + memory which is not support in
KVM).
Ju
FYI.
So it turn out it might be a bug in the F5 virtual edition.
When I did a test with a older physical F5 I was at least able to install
the VLAN..
So far I think the Ethernet media detection in the VE edition is a problem.
At least it's documented as known bug; a error is logged which might be
Apologies if this is a repeat, I couldn't find this in the archives and I
previously wasn't subscribed to this list.
Hello guys,
I have a special client request that I'm not quite certain the most secure
way to fulfil.
Client wants to host a virtual office environment of Windows VMs on the
cloud
33 matches
Mail list logo
