Hi,
I have just noticed the occasional following error messages in kern.log.
This is happening on all but 1 of my nodes. Is anyone else
experiencing this issue?
=
Feb 23 06:53:24 aurora kernel: [10185338.400091] top[27631]: segfault
at 0 ip 7f025eba3315 sp 7fff3f9ed308 error 4 in
libc-
Hi All,
We experienced a storage failure a few days back and Cloudstack has since
recovered (everything is up and running) but the Networks seem to be in a
funny state. They're all in an "Implementing" state. And as such I cannot
restart them.
I only came across this because I was digging into po
Ronald,
I've seen this happening since version 3 of CS, so for me it is a know issue.
Not sure what changes the state of Network, but it seems to change from time to
time. The way I deal with it is by changing the database entry for the network
to the right state and it seems to work.
Andr
Hello,
I am attempting to setup cloudstack on Xen Server, I have setup the traffic
labels it seems all is well in that regard. The system VMs are running
without issue and setup the way I would like them as follows:
Public IP Addressx.x.x.x (omitted for obvious reasons)Private IP Address
10.4.234
[image: Inline image 1]
You can see it states I have 112 public IP address, that is not correct, I
am only using 12 public IP addresses. Along with that, due to my previous
e-mail (Xen Server Setup) it would seem as though my inability to configure
it correctly.
Again, if someone can assist me, I
Thanks Andrei, appreciate your feedback.
I'll take a shufti in the DB to change the state and I'll open up a ticket.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Ronald,
>
>
> I've seen this happening since version 3 of CS, so for me it is a know
> issue. Not sure what changes
Could you re-attach your inline image and add me on jabber?
mattisb...@authbase.com :)
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Mo wrote:
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> You can see it states I have 112 public IP address, that is not correct, I
> am only using 12 public IP addresses. Along with that, due
I have created basic zone, with no security group on CS 4.0.2 and
hypervisor is xenserver. SSVM and CPVM is running state but I am not able
to ping SSVM Public IP. it says " Destination Host Unreachable" . So I am
not able to download CentOS template and and hence not able to create any
guest vm.
What about the SSVM's link local address? Can you ping that? It should
begin with 169.254.
On Feb 23, 2014 9:41 PM, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote:
> I have created basic zone, with no security group on CS 4.0.2 and
> hypervisor is xenserver. SSVM and CPVM is running state but I am not able
> to ping SSVM
nope not able to ping link local of SSVM or CPVM.
Regards,
Tejas
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Ian Young wrote:
> What about the SSVM's link local address? Can you ping that? It should
> begin with 169.254.
> On Feb 23, 2014 9:41 PM, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote:
>
> > I have created basic zone,
This should help you debug :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec
ondary+storage+troubleshooting
On 2/23/14 9:44 PM, "Ian Young" wrote:
>What about the SSVM's link local address? Can you ping that? It should
>begin with 169.254.
>On Feb 23, 2014 9:41 PM, "T
Hello,
All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS share using async, why not use
sync for better data protection?
Has anyone used NFS shares with sync? what would be the drawbacks if any?
Thanks for your valuable responses.
Amin
If you are deploying CloudStack with XenServer and NFS the system will
force sync by default for primary and secondary storage. This is the
default option for XenServer.
Not sure how it is trated for VMware and KVM.
Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather
Cloud Central
Scale Your Data Center In Th
Thanks Amough,
JAVA Process was not running and
this doc resolved the issue...
Regards,
Tejas
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> This should help you debug :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec
> ondary+storage+troubleshooting
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
