Re: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi,

No, we are not using anything specific. We are using IPv6 in Basic Networking 
and we recently merged code into master which supports it from CloudStack and 
for example Security Grouping.

But we haven't done anything with the VR yet.

Planning to do so that for example the SSVM can download resources from 
IPv6-enabled hosts and such, but in Basic Networking the VR is not involved in 
the data path and thus we didn't do anything.

Wido

> Op 16 februari 2017 om 12:28 schreef Dag Sonstebo 
> :
> 
> 
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> As you point out there doesn't’ seem to be a IPv6 specific system VM 
> template. I believe the guys at PCExtreme may have been working on this, I’ve 
> cheekily cc’ed them in and hopefully they can give you an update.
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 14/02/2017, 16:15, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> According to the documentation 
> (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html), it's 
> required to upgrade the SystemVM template to enable IPv6 support on virtual 
> routers. Where can I found the image? There's a reference to 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ in the manual, but 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>  seems to be the same image that I've installed when I set up, so - do I 
> really need to upgrade it?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> V.Melnik
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> s: +44 203 603 0540
> e: dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com  |  w: www.shapeblue.com  |  t:  @shapeblue
> a: 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> 
> 
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue 
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under 
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
> incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa 
> and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you 
> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any 
> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact 
> the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services:
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build|CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting|CloudStack Software Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support|CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

RE: Set up Xenserver for CloudStack

[Jeremy Peterson]

Gabriel's questions are valid.  A lot of people use XenServer so ask away, but 
NIC count on the hosts will help someone guide you through some issues.

I know one of the first issues I had was the storage network since I was using 
ISCSI I wasn't accounting for what storage meant to cloudstack.  A picture 
helped me with network labels in my setup of 4 nic's per host.

https://www.screencast.com/t/il0DPyIA7qP 

Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Beims Bräscher [mailto:gabr...@autonomiccs.com.br] 
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:07 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Set up Xenserver for CloudStack

Hi,

Do you have any specific needs? What versions of XenServer and Apache 
CloudStack do you intend to use? How many NICs does each host have?

Hope that with some clue of your needs and resources, we may be more helpful.

Cheers,
Gabriel.

Em 16/02/2017 23:14, lmartinez073 escreveu:
> Hi
> Does somebody has experience configuring Xenserver for an advance networking 
> with CS?
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Re: Router VM: patchviasocket.py timeout issue on 1 out of 4 networks

[Syahrul Sazli Shaharir]

Hi,

For the benefit of others, I've worked around this issue by:-
- SSH to router VM via local IP through host running the VM
- tail /var/log/cloud.log to pinpoint the source of loop
- Find the looping script in /opt/cloud , edit and disable the looping part
- If you do this quick (before timeout), VM will resume boot
successfully - if not try again until succeed.

Full notes for my particular case:
https://pulasan.my/doku.php?id=cs_masalah_router_vm

Thanks.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Syahrul Sazli Shaharir
 wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Simon Weller  wrote:
>> When you're in the console, can you ping the host ip?
>
> Yes - some (not all) of the IPs assigned on the host.
>
>> What are your ip tables rules on this host currently?
>
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source   destination
> ACCEPT udp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53
> ACCEPT tcp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0tcp dpt:53
> ACCEPT udp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0udp dpt:67
> ACCEPT tcp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0tcp dpt:67
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source   destination
> ACCEPT all  --  0.0.0.0/0192.168.122.0/24 ctstate
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT all  --  192.168.122.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
> ACCEPT all  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
> REJECT all  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
> reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> REJECT all  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
> reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source   destination
> ACCEPT udp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0udp dpt:68
>
>> Can you dump the routing table as well?
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
> 0.0.0.0 172.16.30.33  0.0.0.0 UG0 0
>   0 cloudbr2.304
> 10.1.30.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0  0 bond1
> 10.2.30.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0
> 0 cloudbr2.352
> 10.3.30.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0
> 0 cloudbr2.353
> 172.16.30.32  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0
>   0 cloudbr2.304
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0  0 
> cloud0
> 192.168.122.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0  0 
> virbr0
>
>> Have you tried a restart of one of the working networks to see if it fails 
>> on restart?
>
> Yes, and able to restart OK. I logged on to each network's router VM
> console during the patchviasocket.py stage onwards, and find the
> following difference (both VMs were created and booted in the same
> host):-
>
> 1. Working network router VM ( http://pastebin.com/Y6zpDa6M ) :-
> .
>
> Dec 20 01:37:55 r-686-VM cloud: Boot up process done
> Dec 20 01:37:55 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: configuation format version 1.0
> Dec 20 01:37:55 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: creating file:
> /var/cache/cloud/monitor_service.json
> Dec 20 01:37:55 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: create file success
> Dec 20 01:37:55 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: executing:
> /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py monitor_service.json
> Dec 20 01:38:16 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: execution success
> Dec 20 01:38:16 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: creating file:
> /var/cache/cloud/vm_dhcp_entry.json
> Dec 20 01:38:16 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: create file success
> Dec 20 01:38:16 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: executing:
> /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py vm_dhcp_entry.json
> Dec 20 01:38:38 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: execution success
> Dec 20 01:38:38 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: creating file:
> /var/cache/cloud/vm_dhcp_entry.json
> Dec 20 01:38:38 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: create file success
> Dec 20 01:38:38 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: executing:
> /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py vm_dhcp_entry.json
> Dec 20 01:39:01 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: execution success
> Dec 20 01:39:01 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: creating file:
> /var/cache/cloud/vm_metadata.json
> Dec 20 01:39:01 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: create file success
> Dec 20 01:39:01 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: executing:
> /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py vm_metadata.json
> Dec 20 01:39:21 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: execution success
> Dec 20 01:39:21 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: creating file:
> /var/cache/cloud/vm_metadata.json
> Dec 20 01:39:21 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: create file success
> Dec 20 01:39:21 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: executing:
> /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py vm_metadata.json
> Dec 20 01:39:41 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: execution success
> Dec 20 01:39:41 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: Flushing conntrack table
> Dec 20 01:39:41 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: Flushing conntrack table completed
> Dec 20 01:39:42 r-686-VM cloud: VR config: configuation format version 1.0
> Dec 20 01:39:42 

Re: Set up Xenserver for CloudStack

[Gabriel Beims Bräscher]

Hi,

Do you have any specific needs? What versions of XenServer and Apache 
CloudStack do you intend to use? How many NICs does each host have?


Hope that with some clue of your needs and resources, we may be more 
helpful.


Cheers,
Gabriel.

Em 16/02/2017 23:14, lmartinez073 escreveu:

Hi
Does somebody has experience configuring Xenserver for an advance networking 
with CS?



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Set up Xenserver for CloudStack

[lmartinez073]

Hi
Does somebody has experience configuring Xenserver for an advance networking 
with CS?



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Re: Local LVM on KVM hosts

[Vladimir Melnik]

Hello,

Thanks! I'm sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough, but the thing I meant is using 
separate LVM volumes without QEMU-images. :)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:54:54PM +, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> Yes you can use local storage on KVM – you need to:
> 
> 1) Enable it when you create the zone.
> 2) Create service offerings with local storage.
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 16/02/2017, 13:36, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is there a way to use the local LVMs as a primary storage on the KVM 
> hosts?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> V.Melnik
> 
> 
> 
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 

-- 
V.Melnik

RE: Local LVM on KVM hosts

[Simon Weller]

There is also a PR currently in queue to enable live migration (including 
storage) between local storage backed hosts I believe.



Simon Weller/615-312-6068

-Original Message-
From: Dag Sonstebo [dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com]
Received: Thursday, 16 Feb 2017, 7:55AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Local LVM on KVM hosts

Hi Vladimir,

Yes you can use local storage on KVM – you need to:

1) Enable it when you create the zone.
2) Create service offerings with local storage.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 16/02/2017, 13:36, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:

Hello,

Is there a way to use the local LVMs as a primary storage on the KVM hosts?

Thanks!

--
V.Melnik



dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

AW: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

[Skale Franz]

Hi,
since ACS doesn't support IPV6 in the system vm i tweaked the DB to not create 
a virtual router but deploying my own.
We have a IPV6 only env and using unique local unicast.


Rgds.

Franz



Von: UAB STARNITA 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 14:34
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

Hello,

As i know, atthe moment no. I'm interesting it too

2017-02-16 03:10 popiet "Vladimir Melnik"  rašė:

> Thank you very much for the information.
>
> Does anyone use IPv6 in ACS at the moment? Is it working fine?
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:28:06AM +, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > As you point out there doesn't’ seem to be a IPv6 specific system VM
> template. I believe the guys at PCExtreme may have been working on this,
> I’ve cheekily cc’ed them in and hopefully they can give you an update.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > On 14/02/2017, 16:15, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to the documentation (http://docs.cloudstack.
> apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html), it's required to upgrade the
> SystemVM template to enable IPv6 support on virtual routers. Where can I
> found the image? There's a reference to http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
> systemvm/ in the manual, but http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/
> systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 seems to be the same image that
> I've installed when I set up, so - do I really need to upgrade it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > V.Melnik
> >
> >
> >
> > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> V.Melnik
>

Re: Local LVM on KVM hosts

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Vladimir,

Yes you can use local storage on KVM – you need to:

1) Enable it when you create the zone.
2) Create service offerings with local storage.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 16/02/2017, 13:36, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:

Hello,

Is there a way to use the local LVMs as a primary storage on the KVM hosts?

Thanks!

-- 
V.Melnik



dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Local LVM on KVM hosts

[Vladimir Melnik]

Hello,

Is there a way to use the local LVMs as a primary storage on the KVM hosts?

Thanks!

-- 
V.Melnik

Re: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

[UAB STARNITA]

Hello,

As i know, atthe moment no. I'm interesting it too

2017-02-16 03:10 popiet "Vladimir Melnik"  rašė:

> Thank you very much for the information.
>
> Does anyone use IPv6 in ACS at the moment? Is it working fine?
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:28:06AM +, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > As you point out there doesn't’ seem to be a IPv6 specific system VM
> template. I believe the guys at PCExtreme may have been working on this,
> I’ve cheekily cc’ed them in and hopefully they can give you an update.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > On 14/02/2017, 16:15, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to the documentation (http://docs.cloudstack.
> apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html), it's required to upgrade the
> SystemVM template to enable IPv6 support on virtual routers. Where can I
> found the image? There's a reference to http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
> systemvm/ in the manual, but http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/
> systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 seems to be the same image that
> I've installed when I set up, so - do I really need to upgrade it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > V.Melnik
> >
> >
> >
> > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> V.Melnik
>

Re: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

[Vladimir Melnik]

Thank you very much for the information.

Does anyone use IPv6 in ACS at the moment? Is it working fine?

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:28:06AM +, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> As you point out there doesn't’ seem to be a IPv6 specific system VM 
> template. I believe the guys at PCExtreme may have been working on this, I’ve 
> cheekily cc’ed them in and hopefully they can give you an update.
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 14/02/2017, 16:15, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> According to the documentation 
> (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html), it's 
> required to upgrade the SystemVM template to enable IPv6 support on virtual 
> routers. Where can I found the image? There's a reference to 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ in the manual, but 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>  seems to be the same image that I've installed when I set up, so - do I 
> really need to upgrade it?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> V.Melnik
> 
> 
> 
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 

-- 
V.Melnik

Re: Enabling IPv6 in ACS-4.8

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Vladimir,

As you point out there doesn't’ seem to be a IPv6 specific system VM template. 
I believe the guys at PCExtreme may have been working on this, I’ve cheekily 
cc’ed them in and hopefully they can give you an update.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 14/02/2017, 16:15, "Vladimir Melnik"  wrote:

Hello,

According to the documentation 
(http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html), it's 
required to upgrade the SystemVM template to enable IPv6 support on virtual 
routers. Where can I found the image? There's a reference to 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ in the manual, but 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
 seems to be the same image that I've installed when I set up, so - do I really 
need to upgrade it?

Thanks!

-- 
V.Melnik



dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: new systemvm template for master

[Rohit Yadav]

Thanks Rajani,


I've too created/uploaded the 4.10 systemvmtemplate that have support for Java8 
and strongswan VPN here:

http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.10/


Trillian/BlueOrangutan will use these templates for testing PRs on master/4.10 
as well.

I ran one round of regression smoke tests here with these new templates:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836#issuecomment-280045307


Regards.


From: Rajani Karuturi 
Sent: 16 February 2017 10:59:51
To: Users; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: new systemvm template for master

FYI,

With strongswan[1] and java8[2] changes, a new systemvm template
is required on master.

Latest systemvm template is available at
https://builds.cloudstack.org/job/build-master-systemvm/lastSuccessfulBuild/

Thank you Pierre-Luc Dion for creating the build :)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741

[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: Basic Networking (ACS 4.9) --Allow VMs access from Local Area Network

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi John,

Thanks for clarifying. Got a few more questions regarding your design:

First of all – were you planning on using two zones, or were you planning on 
using one zone with two hypervisors?

Secondly – you’ve mentioned two subnets (rather than two VLANs) – 
192.168.30.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 – how were you planning on using these? 
Which of these is your management network (where your hypervisors, management 
and storage lives) and which one is your guest network? Do you have L3 routing 
between these? How did you map the traffic types (management, guest) to your 
cloudbridges on your KVM hosts?

With regards to your questions:

> *The good:*
>I can create VMs on either of the hosts. I'm able to ping the VMs and even
> ssh into them only if I'm on the host or the management server or from the
> ACS console itself (within the network).

This doesn’t quite make sense – did you configure security groups to allow ICMP 
and ssh? If not your networking is not right – you should not be able to do 
this unless you allow the traffic through security groups.

> *The Issue:*
> I can't ssh or even ping the VMs when in the same network outside the host
> environment. What could be the problem?

As above – this all depends on your security groups.

> A. Management Server network config is as below:
> B. The KVM host network configuration is a below:

OK not sure what you are trying to achieve. With the resources you have listed 
I would probably do something like the following:

- Configure one zone with one pod, one cluster and two hypervisors.
- Configure 192.168.10.0/24 as your Management network – put all three hosts on 
this and map the traffic to cloudbr0.
- Configure 192.168.30.0/24 as your guest network, map traffic to cloudbr1. 

Hope this makes sense.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 15/02/2017, 14:19, "John Adams"  wrote:

Hi Boris,

Thanks for your response. Yes I'm building a basic zone, just for starters.


--John O. Adams

On 15 February 2017 at 16:32, Boris Stoyanov 
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Maybe I misunderstood, are you building advanced or basic zone?
>
> Thanks,
> Boris Stoyanov
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 12:34 PM, John Adams  wrote:
>
> Hi Boris,
>
> I think I'm actually using the Shared network offering. The VMs being
> created are in the same same physical network subnet. Isolation is an
> option but I'm not using that at this point.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --John O. Adams
>
> On 15 February 2017 at 11:50, Boris Stoyanov  > wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> In isolated networks VMs should be accessed only through the virtual
>> router IP.
>>
>> To access the VM over ssh, you should go to network setting and enable a
>> port on the Virtual Router IP. Then create a port forwarding rule from 
that
>> enabled port to port 22 on the specific VM within that network. After 
that
>> try to ssh the enabled port on the VR and you should end-up in the VM
>>
>> PS. In isolated networks you shouldn’t be able to ping the VM, all the
>> traffic goes through the VR.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Boris Stoyanov
>>
>>
>>
>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:37 AM, John Adams  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Still learning the ropes in a test environment here. Hitting a little
>> snag
>> > with networking here. The physical network has 2 VLANs. (192.168.10.0
>> and
>> > 192.168.30.0)
>> >
>> > This is my current ACS testing environment:
>> >
>> > 1 management server (Ubuntu 14.04): 192.168.30.14
>> > 2 KVM  Hosts (Ubuntu 14.04): 192.168.10.12 and 192.168.30.12
>> >
>> > With that, I created 2 different zones, each with 1 pod and 1 cluster
>> and 1
>> > host respectively.
>> >
>> > *The good:*
>> > I can create VMs on either of the hosts. I'm able to ping the VMs and
>> even
>> > ssh into them only if I'm on the host or the management server or from
>> the
>> > ACS console itself (within the network).
>> >
>> > *The Issue:*
>> > I can't ssh or even ping the VMs when in the same network outside the
>> host
>> > environment. What could be the problem?
>> >
>> > A. Management Server network config is as below:
>> > -
>> > *auto lo*
>> > *iface lo inet loopback*
>> >
>> > *auto eth0*
>> > *iface eth0 inet static*
>> > *   address 192.168.30.14*
>> > *   

RE: How to install fixes?

[Ivan Derbenev]

Never mind, I used shapeblue repository, it has up-to-date fixes

Best Regards
Tech-corps IT Engineer
Ivan Derbenev
Phone: +79633431774

-Original Message-
From: Ivan Derbenev [mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 6:29 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How to install fixes?

Hello!
We currently have CS 4.8, installed from yum repo 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/6/4.8/

We've got a known and already-fixed bug - 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9353, it's said it was pushed 
to master branch However, after the yum update I got nothing to download

Should I upgrade my management server manually, then?
Any info on this? ( I don't need to upgrade to 4.9, I just need current fixes 
for 4.8)

Best Regards
Tech-corps IT Engineer
Ivan Derbenev
Phone: +79633431774