Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.

Re: CloudStack on Debian?

Hi, I've compiled 4.15 on Debian 10. They are a few dependencies that need to be resolved. I've not installed those packages yet. I will give it a try and report back. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, 4 January 2021 15:37, Daan Hoogland wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify > the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you > add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: > "rbd://cephtest:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan Hoogland I think we can continue with RC3 vote/tally, I'll send a doc PR. Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 14:35 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yad

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25 To: Wido den Hollander ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org ; Gabriel Beim

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Hi all, After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel +1 (non binding) * Abhishek 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out a

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

I forgot to rename the thread so for archive purposes, this. On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:18 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Hi all, > > After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes* with > 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / binding) > * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel > > +1 (

回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Hi Rohit and Wido According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary storage monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789 (createStoragePool api : url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@10.100.250.14:6789/rbd ) The primary storage is added successfully. But, now there a

Re: CloudStack on Debian?

Thank you, just wanted to find out specific reasons. Suppose testing against a single vendor is a valid concern. I tried to compile on Debian 10 with default system packages using "master" from git. Build returns success just that at the end I get the following from using the command "mvn -P

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote: > Hi Rohit and Wido > > > According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary storage > monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789 > > (createStoragePool api : > url: > rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@10.100.250.14:6789/rbd > ) >

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work with any CloudStack version so far? On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote: > > Hi Rohit and Wido > > > > > > According to the document description, I re-tested addin

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

On 1/4/21 1:42 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work > with any CloudStack version so far? > Yes. Running it in production on Ubuntu 18.04 hypervisors and Ceph servers. This is with CloudStack 4.13.1 Wido > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 a

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

All, I've tested a toy Ubuntu 20.04.1 + Ceph 15.2.7 + ACS 4.15RC3 env, and I think the issue is coming from libvirt or rados java. This was seen on an existing Ceph cluster added prior to upgrade (upgrade to both ACS 4.15RC3 which bundles a new rados-java v0.6.0 dependency) where VM deployment

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

On comparing git history, turns out the double escaping was added in this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4231 @Wido Hollander can you advise how this was tested and can you advise mitigation of the double escape issue or send a PR? Regards.

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

On 1/4/21 2:05 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On comparing git history, turns out the double escaping was added in this PR: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4231 > The double-escape was only wrapped into an if-statement in that PR, it was always there it seems. So we might be facing a di