Hi everyone!
What other solutions, besides Veeam, can be used (in production) to backup
virtual machines integrated with CloudStack?
Hi Murilo,
There is DELL EMC Networker as well I can find in the documentation:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/networker_plugin.html#dell-emc-networker-backup-and-recovery-plugin
-Jithin
From: Murilo Moura
Date: Tuesday, 7 November 2023 at 8:56 AM
To:
Hello,
I am running 4.18.1.0, and for some reason, it will not let me create new
domain routers. The error in the log says:
No suitable pools found for volumes
It's like it can't find enough storage for the router VM. But, I can create
new VMs with no issues on domains with existing
I started looking at the templates and I changed the Xenserver template back
to the default 4.17.0 template. I know this would not work in general, but I
wanted to see if it would create the VM at least.
It created the VM.
So, I went and redownloaded the system VM from the Cloudstack site
I have users who can see disabled service offerings in their Service
offerings screen. I disabled these at the root level, and the users are part
of a sub-domain, so they do not have admin rights.
Is there a permission I have set somewhere to cause this?
Marty
I found my issue.
Redownloading the template fixed the issue, I just forgot to make it a SYSTEM
vs. USER type
Marty
From: ma...@gonsource.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 2:18 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Cant Create new system routers
I started looking
Try "qemu-img convert -p VineetVM-disk1.vmdk-O qcow2 VineetVM-disk1.img"
but judging by those errors, the vmdk may have issues (corruption).
On 2023-11-05 19:58, Technology rss wrote:
Thank you,
I am trying 3 way convert but always failed. have any option for
success
convert ?
not according to that page, Loges.
request parameters are
Request parameters
*Parameter Name* Description Required
*id* *the ID of the service offering to be updated* *true*
*displaytext* *the display text of the service offering to be updated*
*false*
*name* *the name of the service offering to
Hi,
The most annoying I’ve found until now is that you can’t adjust any offerings,
other then it’s name, description and availability.
For example, in the source nat offering I wanted to have the egress policy
adjusted from deny to allow, now I have to fully recreate it for just one
Yes Loges,
but only a limited number of attributes. I think Jimmy wants to be able to
also change #cpu, cpu-speed,memory etc
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:21 AM Logeswaran T
wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> You can able to update the compute or other offerings through API.
>
> Please check this URL:
Hi Daan,
Using update service offering API, I think we are able to change CPU speed,
memory, etc.., Please check this URL.
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.8/domain_admin/updateServiceOffering.html
Regards,
Loges
www.stackbill.com
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:56 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
Hi Jimmy,
You can able to update the compute or other offerings through API.
Please check this URL: https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/
Regards,
Loges
www.stackbill.com
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:44 PM Jimmy Huybrechts
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The most annoying I’ve found until now is
Not the cpu and such perse but it would have been nice if I could adjust the
default egress rules from deny to allow and being able to adjust the storage
from shared to local.
I can see a reason why you do not want this for running instances but I have no
instances using this yet.
Is there a
Maybe the global setting would the best one here? So people can decide for
themselves if they want it (and take the risks with it) or use it as it is now.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Jimmy Huybrechts
Van: Daan Hoogland
Datum: maandag, 6 november 2023 om 11:55
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org
could you add an issue Jimmy,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new
I'll help you refine it if needed.
mazzel,
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 12:12 PM Jimmy Huybrechts
wrote:
> Maybe the global setting would the best one here? So people can decide for
> themselves if they want it (and take
Of course, see here
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8188
--
Jimmy
Van: Daan Hoogland
Datum: maandag, 6 november 2023 om 13:05
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Adjust offerings
could you add an issue Jimmy,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new
I'll help you
Jimmy,
There is a good reason for that, though we could implement a setting and
then allow it if it is true.
The reason is that the offerings may be in use by VMs and restart of those
VMs could lead to unexpected results. In a public offering for instance
tariffs may change as a result. I can
I'm not sure how to formulate the best enhancement request yet, but there
surely is one in there.
for instance:
- extra input parameters to the request that will be ignore in case the
offering is in use
- a force flag
- a global setting that will allow it
I am really not sure which will be the
Hi Team,
I'm deploying CloudStack, with basic network configuration. Appreciate if you
could answer as soon as possible.
I have couple of doubts which I couldn't able to find answer in document or I
have missed it, so please guide me:
* After deploying instance from existing CentOS or
Hi,
Do you use ceph ?
Can you file an issue on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues ?
-Wei
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 17:12, Hs, Punitha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the update.
>
> CloudStack version: 4.18.1.0
> Hypervisor : RHEL 8.6 with KVM
> Using shared block storage as primary
Hi,
The credential of build-in CentOS 5.x template is root/password.
Do you use local storage ? The live migration between hosts with local
storage is supported in some recent releases.
The live migration between shared storage is supported since the first
releases.
It would be good to share
Hi,
Thank you for the update.
CloudStack version: 4.18.1.0
Hypervisor : RHEL 8.6 with KVM
Using shared block storage as primary storage.
If I do storage migration between the storage pools when VM is running getting
below error:
Failed to migrate VM [VM instance
Your source seems corrupt.
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Ruben Bosch
CLDIN
> On 6 Nov 2023, at 19:40, Technology rss wrote:
>
> Thank you,
> But same error after this byte 9529458688 value
>
> qemu-img convert -p VineetVM-disk1.vmdk -O qcow2 VineetVM-disk1.img
> qemu-img: error
Thank you,
But same error after this byte 9529458688 value
qemu-img convert -p VineetVM-disk1.vmdk -O qcow2 VineetVM-disk1.img
qemu-img: error while reading at byte 9529458688: Invalid argument
--
*Thanks & Regards.**Support Admin*
--
*Facebook
24 matches
Mail list logo
