Hi All,
Can anyone conform me is sr-iov support CloudStack 4.19.0 LTS. I want to use
this technology.
If any one have idea, Please let me know.
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar
Piotr,
I see you don't have a cloudbr0 or similar bridge which is default. If you want
to use custom bridge, then you need to configure your zone's physical network's
traffic type with such traffic labels before adding the KVM host.
You can cross-check this against the KVM host (where it failed
In addition to what Rohit said, it looks like there are some bridges
already created.
you can update the traffic label of physical networks to guest0 ,
public0 or ceph0.
The default traffic labels are cloudbr0/cloudbr1 which might not be
what you plan to use.
-Wei
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:22 AM
Yes, that is the reason.
When creating the zone, the network label remained unchanged (even though I
provided the appropriate names).
Is it possible to update it without deleting the zone?
Piotr
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 10:40 AM
To: users@cloudst
GitHub user mpbraj edited a discussion: Setup Cloudstack HCI
HI, Planning a test platform for installing and configuring CloudStack with 3
node KVM + storage cluster which is a HCI architectureAlso with separate
storage NIC...Can someone help me with some document/Howto or some website li
Yes, you can update them against the traffic types for KVM in the physical
networks of the zone.
-Jithin
From: Piotr Pisz
Date: Thursday, 11 July 2024 at 2:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Missing bridge/device network configuration
Yes, that is the reason.
When creating the
On CloudStack GUI, go to zone-> Physical Network -> click the name ->
click the 4th icon "Update traffic labels" on the top-right.
-Wei
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Piotr Pisz wrote:
>
> Yes, that is the reason.
> When creating the zone, the network label remained unchanged (even though I
Ok, everything works, it turned out that the vlan interface names must be
standard, i.e. vlan.* and not host.*
Thank you for your help :-)
Piotr
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 12:46 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Missing bridge/device
+0 (binding)
*
Tested fresh installation of EL8 packages, deployed VM from newly created
template on a newly created network; tested VM, volume & network lifecycles
using both mbx & health check tests passing w/Trillian/BO
*
Tested upgrade from 4.19.0.2 EL8 to 4.19.1.0 RC1 EL8 pkgs using mb
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: No
Destination found for a deployment for VMinstance
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9372#discussioncomment-10020433
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: No Destination
found for a deployment for VMinstance
@chinmaya-kumar-biswal there are so many reasons this could happen. The one
that comes to mind is that the requirements of the VM is 3 CPU while the Hosts
in your env have 2 at mos
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Hey Sorry i just saw this @zap51
It was the VTEP. More details here:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/plugins/vxla
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache what are your thoughts on this so far?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9158#discussioncomment-10021126
This is an automatically sent email f
GitHub user BryanMLima added a comment to the discussion: Instance backups
> In this case I already have one now where everything goes to it, if I add a
> new secondary storage I can have that one for only the snapshots using the
> above right?
@pcfriek1987, yes, you'll only need to change th
Rohit,
That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to
restore them.
Hope your marriage is intact after this little adventure. :)
I'll be doing some testing shortly.
On 2024-07-11 12:52, Rohit Yadav wrote:
+0 (binding)
*
Tested fresh installation of EL8 packages, d
I'm still trying to figure out the physical network setup based on your
talks, Wido.
Just to clarify that VXLAN isolation only works for Guest traffic types,
correct? Then how would Management and Public traffic type be configured
with a setup running fully L3 (BGP unnumbered etc) between the leaf
All,
I've to revise my vote to a -1 (binding), as there's a regression in the VM
deployment logic which currently seems to affect anything non-shared storage
(like local storage).
2024-07-12 11:49:29,799 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-43:ctx-7277b927 job-10187/j
17 matches
Mail list logo
