Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC2)

2024-07-16 Thread Jithin Raju
+1 Tested with upgrade, VR patching & instance deployments. -Jithin From: Daan Hoogland Date: Monday, 15 July 2024 at 9:03 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC2) +1 (binding) a bit biased , i can't remember the times I tested 4.19 over t

Re: [D] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-07-16 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address @weizhouapache As discussed earlier I have separated private and public ip address with a separate network , Right now I'm not able to ping public ip ranges from kvm /managemen

Cleanup snapshots table

2024-07-16 Thread Torsten Hübler
Hello, is it safe to delete old entries from the snapshots table with status="Destroyed" or status="Error"? We have repeated problems with recurring volume snapshots beeing stuck in "Creating". Our snapshots table has > 1.500.000 entries of destroyed snapshots. I want to make sure, that the sn

The private ip address of the server (46.23.82.133) is not compatible with the CIDR of pod

2024-07-16 Thread Embedded Devel
Pretty self explainatory XCP-NG host on public IP CS management server also on public IP even trying with basic zone it errors out with The private ip address of the server (46.23.82.133) is not compatible with the CIDR of pod im simply trying to use the public /26 as small test environme

Re: The private ip address of the server (46.23.82.133) is not compatible with the CIDR of pod

2024-07-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
https://www.calculator.net/ip-subnet-calculator.html?cclass=any&csubnet=26&cip=46.23.82.133&ctype=ipv4&x=Calculate does your pod range and subnet align with the outcome of this ^ calculation? On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:22 PM Embedded Devel wrote: > > Pretty self explainatory > > XCP-NG host on pub