RE: 关于cloudstack4.4虚拟路由器更新的问题
通过yum安装，一切正常。 可能因为jdk版本不一样。 过程： 最小化安装CentOS6.5_x64 然后通过yum安装的CloudStack4.4 root@localhost yum.repos.d]# yum info java-1.7.0-openjdk Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.01link.hk * extras: centos.01link.hk * updates: centos.01link.hk Installed Packages Name: java-1.7.0-openjdk Arch: x86_64 Epoch : 1 Version : 1.7.0.65 Release : 2.5.1.2.el6_5 Size: 91 M Repo: installed From repo : updates Summary : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ License : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions : and LGPL+ and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and : W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment. [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# yum info cloudstack-management Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.01link.hk * extras: centos.01link.hk * updates: centos.01link.hk Installed Packages Name: cloudstack-management Arch: x86_64 Version : 4.4.0 Release : NONOSS_3.el6 Size: 96 M Repo: installed From repo : cloudstack Summary : CloudStack management server UI License : ASL 2.0 Description : The CloudStack management server is the central point of : coordination, management, and intelligence in CloudStack. [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# service cloudstack-management status cloudstack-management (pid 1391) 正在?行... -Original Message- From: aix.niuy [mailto:aix.n...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:04 PM To: users-cn Subject: 关于cloudstack4.4虚拟路由器更新的问题 请问有人清楚官网Cloudstack4.4的文档什么时候更新吗？目前虚拟路由器按照官方最新的模板安装后提示 Unable to start instance due to Unable to send command. Upgrade in progress. Please contact administrator. 想对照文档看下安装是否有遗漏 4.4版本的模板路径如下： http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 目前的实验环境 Centos64 java版本 yum info java-1.7.0-openjdk Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Installed Packages Name: java-1.7.0-openjdk Arch: x86_64 Epoch : 1 Version : 1.7.0.9 Release : 2.3.4.1.el6_3 Size: 89 M Repo: installed From repo : Centrin-CentOS-6.4-x86_64 Summary : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ License : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions and LGPL+ : and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment. 另外在cenots65下用系统自带的java版本安装报错，centos65的版本为 java-1.7.0-openjdk 1.7.0.45 2014-07-30 aix.niuy Disclaimer: The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if any, are confidential and may be protected by law against any unauthorized use. If you have received this e-mail by mistake or have reason to believe that you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail as soon as possible and delete it from your computer system immediately thereafter. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this e-mail or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. While we have made every effort to keep our network virus free, we take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
添加Host失败，Xenserver6.0.2，CloudStack4.2.0
请教各位大牛一个比较基本的问题。 我在高级资源域中，添加Xenserver类型的Host时失败，management-server.log中的信息如下： # 2014-07-31 19:34:13,492 INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-10:null) Trying to add a new host at http://192.168.1.5 in data center 1 2014-07-31 19:34:13,496 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool] (catalina-exec-10:null) Failed to slave local login to 192.168.1.5 due to org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: Failed to read server's response: Connection refused 2014-07-31 19:34:13,497 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool] (catalina-exec-10:null) localLogout has problem Failed to read server's response: Connection refused 2014-07-31 19:34:13,497 DEBUG [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer] (catalina-exec-10:null) other exceptions: java.lang.RuntimeException: can not get master ip java.lang.RuntimeException: can not get master ip at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool.getMasterIp(XenServerConnectionPool.java:347) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.find(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:183) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:741) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:590) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:143) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:158) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:514) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:372) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:305) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:71) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2274) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2014-07-31 19:34:13,497 WARN [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-10:null) Unable to find the server resources at http://192.168.1.5 2014-07-31 19:34:13,497 INFO [utils.exception.CSExceptionErrorCode] (catalina-exec-10:null) Could not find exception: com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException in error code list for exceptions 2014-07-31 19:34:13,498 WARN [admin.host.AddHostCmd] (catalina-exec-10:null) Exception: com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException: Unable to add the host at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:798) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:590) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:143) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:158) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:514) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:372) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:305) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:71) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at
Re: basic zone setup
Yes, if you don't want to reinstall/re-seed the system vm template, you should also download the new ones and do the mysql queries so that it is used for any future system vm deployments. Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: Yes, that makes the ssvm-check pass all the tests. Thanks. Should I repeat that upgrade with the console proxy? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: There have been some messages going around about the template needing a fix for this. Per this link (https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c) from one of the messages you can try the following on the ssvm itself: apt-get update apt-get -y install openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-lib apt-get -y remove openjdk-6-jre-headless then you may also need to: service cloud stop sleep 3 service cloud start try the ssvm-check again after that. My understanding is that this is not a permanent fix, but should get you going for now. On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: I found this in the cloud.out log in the SSVM: Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: com.cloud.agent.AgentShell. Program will exit. It seems to have to do with a Java version mismatch. I'm using JDK 7 on both the management server and hypervisor but the SSVM is using version 6. Is this the most current system VM template? http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh First DNS server is 192.168.100.2 PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.227 ms 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.882 ms --- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.882/1.054/1.227/0.173 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com ERROR: NFS is not currently mounted Try manually mounting from inside the VM NFS server is 169.254.1.0 PING 169.254.1.0 (169.254.1.0): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms --- 169.254.1.0 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.039/0.053/0.067/0.000 ms Good: Can ping nfs server Management server is 192.168.101.3. Checking connectivity. Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. It says the NFS server is 169.254.1.0 which is the SSVM's link local address. How did it decide that? During the zone configuration I specified virthost1.lax.ratespecial.com as the NFS server and that resolves to 192.168.101.4. Also, in what path does it expect the NFS volume to be mounted? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: If the template is not ready then your ssvm may be having problems downloading it. Have you followed the info here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting to make sure that the ssvm is actually working properly? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: I've reinstalled CloudStack 4.4 again, configuring the network as follows: management server: p4p1 http://pastebin.com/skMXxVtk hypervisor/storage server: eth0
OpenSource Storage Options
Hello, We're new to CloudStack and are looking to find out what others use for their Open Source storage needs, we've planned on using FreeNAS but looking to find out what others use. Thanks!
RE: OpenSource Storage Options
i had a hp msa1000 fiber san and thats what im using for primary, seconday is just nfs on centos. Freenas would help with the nfs mounts. You could do a nfs primary so you could use zfs for snapshots and replication. Do not turn on dedup and if its got a decient processor use lz4 compression on your pools. div Original message /divdivFrom: Mike m...@virtuaclub.com /divdivDate:07/31/2014 4:56 AM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: OpenSource Storage Options /divdiv /divHello, We're new to CloudStack and are looking to find out what others use for their Open Source storage needs, we've planned on using FreeNAS but looking to find out what others use. Thanks!
KVM and advanced network. Routing and IP assignment details.
Hello, Have read nice article about CS and advanced network set-up here: http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networking-architecture/, but have problem with routing. Let me say I have only 1 NIC with all the trunks 100, 200, 300 configured as in KVM configuration guide (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html ). · cloudbr (no tag) top-level bridge for trunks mgmt0, cloudbr0, cloudbr1. · mgmt0 (VLAN 100) bridge has 172.17.1.2 adress and is responsible for hosts network 172.17.1.0/24. · cloudbr0 (VLAN 200) bridge does not have any IP address and is responsible for public network (not used if „security group“ is enabled) · cloudbr1 (VLAN 300) bridge does not have any IP address and is responsible for guest network 192.168.1.0/24 · cloud0 (no tag) – system bridge that is created by cloudstack-agent during host registration. Has IP 169.254.0.1 and manages local-link network 169.254.0.0/16. Acts as gateway for 169.254.0.0 network After setting up cloudstack every system VM gets basically 3 IPs (no problem with this): 1.link local IP, for example: 169.254.0.10 2.private IP, for example: 172.17.1.105 3.public IP, for example: 192.168.1.5 (gw 192.168.1.1 is defined during CS installation, but physically does not present anywhere) There is no problem to communicate within networks 1 and 2, because first one configures cloudstack itself and host network is configured by switch KVM host is connected to. The only question so far: where to configure routing for 3rd network (if it is possible)? I got error „no route to host“ from SSVM, because default route is trough 192.168.1.0 network. May be NAT is needed? Can I define private and public networks from different sub-nets ? Should I configure cloudbr1 IP manually ? Or there is something else? Thank you, Vadim
Re: VM management Shut down alone
Hi, Sorry I didn't see your reply. I find my error. I launched management VM in same hypervisor that i'll use as a compute node. http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/350142-management-server-shut-down-alone/ Thanks you very much for your reply. Clément. - Mail original - De: Anoop Mohan linux.an...@gmail.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Avril 2014 19:16:38 Objet: Re: VM management Shut down alone grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log you will find the error in Cloud-management log On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:28 PM, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote: Hi everybody, I installed a virtual machine centos with this tutorial http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/qig.html I have centos 6.5, xenserver 6.2 Installation finished with success. I have a web access http://IP:8080/client I'm ready for basic configuration. But 3 or 5 minute the VM shut down alone clearly. What's wrong with Virtual Machine. I must look where (log) ? Can you help me ? Thanks for your help. Clément. Responsable SI et RD -- Thanks Regards, Anoop Mohan
Re: KVM and advanced network. Routing and IP assignment details.
Generally you have to provide the public router outside of cloudstack, ie. cloudstack does not provide that feature to be best of my knowledge. It doesn't necessarily have to be a hardware appliance, a simple linux box with iptables nat would suffice for testing / internal use. Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hello, Have read nice article about CS and advanced network set-up here: http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networking-architecture/, but have problem with routing. Let me say I have only 1 NIC with all the trunks 100, 200, 300 configured as in KVM configuration guide ( http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html ). · cloudbr (no tag) top-level bridge for trunks mgmt0, cloudbr0, cloudbr1. · mgmt0 (VLAN 100) bridge has 172.17.1.2 adress and is responsible for hosts network 172.17.1.0/24. · cloudbr0 (VLAN 200) bridge does not have any IP address and is responsible for public network (not used if „security group“ is enabled) · cloudbr1 (VLAN 300) bridge does not have any IP address and is responsible for guest network 192.168.1.0/24 · cloud0 (no tag) – system bridge that is created by cloudstack-agent during host registration. Has IP 169.254.0.1 and manages local-link network 169.254.0.0/16. Acts as gateway for 169.254.0.0 network After setting up cloudstack every system VM gets basically 3 IPs (no problem with this): 1.link local IP, for example: 169.254.0.10 2.private IP, for example: 172.17.1.105 3.public IP, for example: 192.168.1.5 (gw 192.168.1.1 is defined during CS installation, but physically does not present anywhere) There is no problem to communicate within networks 1 and 2, because first one configures cloudstack itself and host network is configured by switch KVM host is connected to. The only question so far: where to configure routing for 3rd network (if it is possible)? I got error „no route to host“ from SSVM, because default route is trough 192.168.1.0 network. May be NAT is needed? Can I define private and public networks from different sub-nets ? Should I configure cloudbr1 IP manually ? Or there is something else? Thank you, Vadim
not access System vm without security group
Hi community, I use cloudstack 4.3 on centos with xenserver 6.2. I created an advanced zone without security group. I have 3 nics : - nics 1 for guest network (tagged Vlan 40) and administration network. - nics 2 for public network - nics 3 for storage network. I have a primary storage iscsi and my secondary storage locate on NFS server. I followed installation instruction (vhd-utils, cloud-install-sys-tmplt ...) No problem for creating my zone but I don't access (ping,ssh ...) at my system vms (network verified). I can add Instance ... But not access at my VMs and feature access console. When I created an advanced zone WITH security group. I don't have problems with System'vm. I can ping. I have access with view console when I create different instances. The only difference is nic public network. When I created an advanced zone WITH security group I can't use nic public network.. Why ? Where I can look for to help ? Thanks for your help ! Clément.
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected and I could see the files. Remount it again from the command line and then the agent would show up. So i was like awesome and tried to start a new instance. It would start because it said that my VR needed a update. Well the VR is using the new template that we just installed and remember from long ago that you could set a global for the router.version.check to false to get around this. I was just able to spin up the default centos template. Now I need a fix for the mounting of secondary storage. Once again thanks for the help and looking forward to your answer. '-Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:30 +0200 Sorry, it is a type in that query. replace vm_template with vm_template_id. Also, User should only be with capital U. I've updated the gist. ie: update vm_instance set vm_template_id = 206 where type 'User' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: While following the instructions I am getting an error on this step while upgrading the DB tables update vm_instance set vm_template = 206 where type 'USER' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:47:34 +0200 try this procedure: https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Cloudstack 4.4 on Xen 6.2 using this system template http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-06-23-master-xen.vhd.bz2 I have tried others but I still ended up with the same error. I also tried with this system template http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-unknown-xen.vhd.bz2 Here is the ouput of my terminal on the ssvm. I have also added the java logs. Can someone point me in the right direction
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected and I could see the files. Remount it again from the command line and then the agent would show up. So i was like awesome and tried to start a new instance. It would start because it said that my VR needed a update. Well the VR is using the new template that we just installed and remember from long ago that you could set a global for the router.version.check to false to get around this. I was just able to spin up the default centos template. Now I need a fix for the mounting of secondary storage. Once again thanks for the help and looking forward to your answer. '-Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:30 +0200 Sorry, it is a type in that query. replace vm_template with vm_template_id. Also, User should only be with capital U. I've updated the gist. ie: update vm_instance set vm_template_id = 206 where type 'User' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: While following the instructions I am getting an error on this step while upgrading the DB tables update vm_instance set vm_template = 206 where type 'USER' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:47:34 +0200 try this procedure: https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Cloudstack 4.4 on Xen 6.2 using this system template
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected and I could see the files. Remount it again from the command line and then the agent would show up. So i was like awesome and tried to start a new instance. It would start because it said that my VR needed a update. Well the VR is using the new template that we just installed and remember from long ago that you could set a global for the router.version.check to false to get around this. I was just able to spin up the default centos template. Now I need a fix for the mounting of secondary storage. Once again thanks for the help and looking forward to your answer. '-Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:30 +0200 Sorry, it is a type in that query. replace vm_template with vm_template_id. Also, User should only be with capital U. I've updated the gist. ie: update vm_instance set vm_template_id = 206 where type 'User' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: While following the instructions I am getting an error on this step while upgrading the DB tables update vm_instance set vm_template = 206 where type 'USER' and hypervisor_type = 'XenServer'; -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 will have a systemvm upgrade issue. But a fresh 4.4 using systemvm-templates 4.4.0-6 will work. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected and I could see the files. Remount it again from the command line and then the agent would show up. So i was like awesome and tried to start a new instance. It would start because it said that my VR needed a update. Well the VR is using the new template that we just installed and remember from long ago that you could set a global for the router.version.check to false to get around this. I was just able to spin up the default centos template. Now I need a fix for the mounting of secondary storage. Once again thanks for the help and looking forward to your answer. '-Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:30 +0200 Sorry, it is a type in that query. replace vm_template with vm_template_id. Also, User should only be with capital U. I've updated the gist. ie: update vm_instance set vm_template_id = 206 where type 'User'
Unable to start a VM due to insufficient capacity
Hi everybody,
I installed a CloudStack 4.3.0 system with a manager (in a virtual machine),
two NFS primary storage, one NFS secondary storare and two host agent on ubuntu
distribution.
The cluster have one advanced zone without security group configuration with
KVM hipervisors.
I create some VM but now does not allow me to create more giving the error message
Unable to start a VM due to insufficient capacity.
I am sure that the resources (ip, ram, cpu and storage) are enough to create
new instances. In dashboard I see all ok.
From the management-server.log I see this errors messages (see attachment for
full version) when I try to deploy a new virtual machine with 1x1GHz cpu, 1GB
or RAM and 20GB disk space:
2014-07-31 14:59:11,983 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 1-684594119: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 77916390353436, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:false,details:VmDataCommand
failed, check agent logs,wait:0}}] }
2014-07-31 14:59:11,983 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) Unable to contact resource.
com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [DataCenter:1] is
unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router
2014-07-31 14:59:12,453 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Starting
to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: 7
2014-07-31 14:59:12,677 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Starting
to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,708 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) Destroying vm VM[User|csweb2] as it
failed to create on Host with Id:null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,738 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Stopped
to Error with event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host
id: null host id before state transition: null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,929 WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38
ctx-d8600c16) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId::
null // message:: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 70, on Host with Id: null
2014-07-31 14:59:13,159 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38) Unexpected exception while executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to start a VM due to
insufficient capacity
Caused by: com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
create a deployment for VM[User|csweb2]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
id=1
2014-07-31 14:59:13,161 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38) Complete async job-783,
jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{uuidList:[],errorcode:530,errortext:Unable
to start a VM due to insufficient capacity}
2014-07-31 14:59:46,280 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-27:ctx-82be396e ctx-41f0cf24) Stopped called on VM[User|csweb2]
but the state is Error
2014-07-31 14:59:46,330 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-27:ctx-82be396e ctx-41f0cf24) VM state transitted from :Error to
Expunging with event: DestroyRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: null
I tried to search in others log file (VmDataCommand failed, check agent
logs), but I don't found nothing...
Can anyone Help me?
--
U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it
P r o c n e s.r.l)
via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT
phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e
confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita.
Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è
destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene
gentilmente comunicazione.
Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it .
Rif. D.L. 196/2003
2014-07-31 14:59:10,556 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-c61df92d) ===START=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachineresponse=jsonsessionkey=JYBJ9eNoOH5hAbD%2BDNV0M8Dr7JI%3Dzoneid=ed6ce5de-2ff4-4d57-aa88-27e904082928templateid=0d935ed9-38b0-4a59-8651-927ba09f2597hypervisor=KVMserviceofferingid=ba47a8d5-6984-40fa-bf3a-a1aa39d0195bdiskofferingid=b487cedd-dc96-4c73-9045-c070c5dd0f29networkids=14e56990-ee1f-46e4-b0c1-eac18daaf433displayname=csweb2name=csweb2_=1406811550539
2014-07-31 14:59:10,562 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiDispatcher] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-c61df92d ctx-d8600c16) InfrastructureEntity
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
a quick update systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 didn't work for me either Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dion, unfortunately that hasn't been the case for me so far, both upgrade or fresh install ended up with same issue, I'm trying the 64 bit version of SSVM, hopefully it will work. Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 will have a systemvm upgrade issue. But a fresh 4.4 using systemvm-templates 4.4.0-6 will work. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected and I could see the files. Remount it again from the command line and then the agent would show up. So i was like awesome and tried to start a new instance. It would start because it said that my VR needed a update. Well the VR is using the new template that we just installed and remember from long ago that you could set a global for the router.version.check to false to get around this. I was just able to spin up the default centos template. Now I need a fix for the mounting of secondary storage.
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Do you mean you upgrade to the 64bit: systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 and it still doesn't work? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: a quick update systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 didn't work for me either Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dion, unfortunately that hasn't been the case for me so far, both upgrade or fresh install ended up with same issue, I'm trying the 64 bit version of SSVM, hopefully it will work. Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 will have a systemvm upgrade issue. But a fresh 4.4 using systemvm-templates 4.4.0-6 will work. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed. Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Thanks eric problem 1 down and another one pops up. SSVM is starting and from its terminal the ssvm check passes now. The only problem is that the agent doesn't show up. What I have done to fix was to unmount secondary storage even though it was connected
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Dion, I have used systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 on a fresh install, and it doesn't work. Dean Toronto On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Do you mean you upgrade to the 64bit: systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 and it still doesn't work? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: a quick update systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 didn't work for me either Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dion, unfortunately that hasn't been the case for me so far, both upgrade or fresh install ended up with same issue, I'm trying the 64 bit version of SSVM, hopefully it will work. Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 will have a systemvm upgrade issue. But a fresh 4.4 using systemvm-templates 4.4.0-6 will work. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli? -Original Message- From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:39:19 +0200 Yes, there's an issue with those templates with regards to VR, it has the wrong version information. Work is being done to fix it, hopefully in a day or so. Disabling the router version check is a workaround as you noticed.
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
ok, I did not test using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 but had it working using systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 on XenServer 6.2 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Dion, I have used systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 on a fresh install, and it doesn't work. Dean Toronto On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Do you mean you upgrade to the 64bit: systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 and it still doesn't work? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: a quick update systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 didn't work for me either Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dion, unfortunately that hasn't been the case for me so far, both upgrade or fresh install ended up with same issue, I'm trying the 64 bit version of SSVM, hopefully it will work. Dean On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 will have a systemvm upgrade issue. But a fresh 4.4 using systemvm-templates 4.4.0-6 will work. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 and run into same issue, I ended up doing fresh install and getting the same issue, there is definitely an issue with SSVM. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Dean, Is this an upgraded 4.4 or a fresh installation of 4.4 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue as well, getting ERROR Java process not running, and SSVM is not mounting NFS storage, causing all templates to fail. I'm using systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2 found in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/ I have also tried systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-xen.vhd.bz2 found on same URL without luck, which SSVM template did you guys use? I'm using CS 4.4 with xenserver 6.2 Thank you On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post the relevant log excerpts to pastebin or similar? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: It happens everytime i new ssvm is created or the management service is restarted div Original message /divdivFrom: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/30/2014 12:24 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: users@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. /divdiv /divHaven't really encountered that one.. could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens with the new as well? Erik On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: What about the agent not connecting till I remount the seconday strorage from the ssvm cli?
aws/ec2 interface cloudstack 4.4
Hi I successfully installed cloudstack 4.4 onto my laptop (host running ubuntu 14.04, cloudstack management and agent running in a centos6.5 KVM guest) using the Quick Installation Guide for CentOS from the documentation. Every thing so far works fine from the web interface. What I need to do is to show that cloudstack will work with the ec2 interface as this is what my main users want. (that and the occi as used by EGI Federated cloud, but that's for another day). I'm having some trouble getting EC2 interface to work with cloudstack. I've followed the instruction in http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/optional_installation.html#amazon-web-services-interface, and used the cloudstack-aws-api-register to register a certificate with the cloudstack api and secret keys (generated in the cloudstack web interface). This was successful according to the output of the script. however when I try to use the ec2 interface I get this type of error $ ./ec2-api-tools-1.3-62308/bin/ec2-describe-instances --debug Server: org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement DescribeInstances com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2SoapFaultException: SOAP Fault[code=Server, str='org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement DescribeInstances'] at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.UnwrapException(Jec2.java:270) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.describeInstances(Jec2.java:1472) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.describeInstances(Jec2.java:1433) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.DescribeInstances.invokeOnline(DescribeInstances.java:57) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.BaseCmd.invoke(BaseCmd.java:795) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.DescribeInstances.main(DescribeInstances.java:66) on the management I see in /var/log/cloudstack/awsapi/awsapi.log (my x's) 2014-07-31 16:09:23,595 DEBUG [c.c.b.a.e.AuthenticationHandler] (catalina-exec-int-6:null) X509 cert's uniqueId: EMAILADDRESS=xx, CN=, OU=x, O=x, L=x, ST=x, C=xx, serial=xx 2014-07-31 16:09:23,597 DEBUG [c.c.b.s.UserContext] (catalina-exec-int-6:null) initializing a new [anonymous] UserContext! First is there any know reason why It should not work in 4.4. I've seen reference to various references to cloud-bridge in older documentation but have not touched it yet. thanks dan * Dr Daniel Traynor, Grid cluster system manager * Tel +44(0)20 7882 6560, Particle Physics,QMUL
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Okay, did you try and login to SSVM and run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh ? does it say JAVA process is running? dose both system VMs has agent status that says connected ? mine only shows on console proxy vm. Dean
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
yes ssvm test show everything ok. When making new system vms the console proxy comes up right but ssvm doesn't. What it takes to get it online is to remount the nfs share from the ssvm console. mount shows this 172.16.2.3:/var/cstss1-2 on /mnt/SecStorage/0b1ff1bc-5486-378f-8347-fa5b4b3d9bf9 type nfs4 (rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,acdirmin=0,acdirmax=0,soft,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,sec=sys,clientaddr=172.16.2.21,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=172.16.2.3) Then I run the commands umount /mnt/SecStorage/0b1ff1bc-5486-378f-8347-fa5b4b3d9bf9/ mount -t nfs 172.16.2.3:/var/cstss1-2 /mnt/SecStorage/0b1ff1bc-5486-378f-8347-fa5b4b3d9bf9 Then mount shows this and in about 2-5 mins the ssvm agent comes up. 172.16.2.3:/var/cstss1-2 on /mnt/SecStorage/0b1ff1bc-5486-378f-8347-fa5b4b3d9bf9 type nfs4 (rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=172.16.2.21,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=172.16.2.3) Also your going to have to go into the globals and turn off the virtual router version check. Eric says that they will have new ssvms in the next few days that will fix the virtual router. I hope that they can fix the ssvm mount issue so I don't have to keep loging into it and fixing after it's been destroyed or rebooted. -Original Message- From: Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:02:31 -0400 Okay, did you try and login to SSVM and run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh ? does it say JAVA process is running? dose both system VMs has agent status that says connected ? mine only shows on console proxy vm. Dean
forcing an IP to a VM
Hi everybody, Can anyone help me telling me how to Force a VM that its on an advance zone to use a predefine IP address. I had a vm that got corrupted and didn't want to start anymore, so i created a second VM but i need to assign to it the same IP that i had in the old VM how can i accomplish this?. Do i just make the change in the database?. Thank you for your help.
Cloudstack 4.2.1 KVM - Redundant Virtual Router switch from unknown to MASTER
Hi All, I started to get email from Cloudstack Management server once a day now with the following message: Subject: Redundant virtual router r-360-VM just switch from UNKNOWN to MASTER Redundant virtual router (name: r-360-VM, id: 360) just switch from UNKNOWN to MASTER any suggestions what is causing this error and how to fix whatever is causing this error? Thanks,
RE: aws/ec2 interface cloudstack 4.4
Hi Daniel, Do you see any more logs in the /var/log/cloudstack/awsapi/awsapi.log? Anything w.r.t processing your request? Also, Can you try using REST to make the EC2 calls? AWS has deprecated SOAP support, so we have seen that the EC2 tools do face some errors while parsing the SOAP response. For REST, you don't need to register the user using cloudstack-aws-api-register. You just need to set CS api key/secret key to the EC2 tool's environment variables Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Daniel Traynor [mailto:d.tray...@qmul.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: aws/ec2 interface cloudstack 4.4 Hi I successfully installed cloudstack 4.4 onto my laptop (host running ubuntu 14.04, cloudstack management and agent running in a centos6.5 KVM guest) using the Quick Installation Guide for CentOS from the documentation. Every thing so far works fine from the web interface. What I need to do is to show that cloudstack will work with the ec2 interface as this is what my main users want. (that and the occi as used by EGI Federated cloud, but that's for another day). I'm having some trouble getting EC2 interface to work with cloudstack. I've followed the instruction in http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/optional_installation.html#amazon-web-services-interface, and used the cloudstack-aws-api-register to register a certificate with the cloudstack api and secret keys (generated in the cloudstack web interface). This was successful according to the output of the script. however when I try to use the ec2 interface I get this type of error $ ./ec2-api-tools-1.3-62308/bin/ec2-describe-instances --debug Server: org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement DescribeInstances com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2SoapFaultException: SOAP Fault[code=Server, str='org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement DescribeInstances'] at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.UnwrapException(Jec2.java:270) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.describeInstances(Jec2.java:1472) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.Jec2.describeInstances(Jec2.java:1433) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.DescribeInstances.invokeOnline(DescribeInstances.java:57) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.BaseCmd.invoke(BaseCmd.java:795) at com.amazon.aes.webservices.client.cmd.DescribeInstances.main(DescribeInstances.java:66) on the management I see in /var/log/cloudstack/awsapi/awsapi.log (my x's) 2014-07-31 16:09:23,595 DEBUG [c.c.b.a.e.AuthenticationHandler] (catalina-exec-int-6:null) X509 cert's uniqueId: EMAILADDRESS=xx, CN=, OU=x, O=x, L=x, ST=x, C=xx, serial=xx 2014-07-31 16:09:23,597 DEBUG [c.c.b.s.UserContext] (catalina-exec-int-6:null) initializing a new [anonymous] UserContext! First is there any know reason why It should not work in 4.4. I've seen reference to various references to cloud-bridge in older documentation but have not touched it yet. thanks dan * Dr Daniel Traynor, Grid cluster system manager * Tel +44(0)20 7882 6560, Particle Physics,QMUL
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Dean, Could you post the content of /etc/cloudstack-version from a running systemvm ? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Dean Yes that uuid was my mount point for secondary storage. Pierre-Luc Dion I don't have the system setup right now but I followed this from eric web to get my system vm working and upgrade my template. try this procedure: https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c If anyone knows of a better 64bit template with openjdk7 I will try it. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:17:53 -0400 Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: basic zone setup
Do you know which MySQL tables need to be updated to reference the new template? I'm worried that if I miss one the system will break unexpectedly the next time I launch a system VM. It might be worthwhile for me to simply reinstall the entire thing to be certain everything's set up correctly. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, if you don't want to reinstall/re-seed the system vm template, you should also download the new ones and do the mysql queries so that it is used for any future system vm deployments. Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: Yes, that makes the ssvm-check pass all the tests. Thanks. Should I repeat that upgrade with the console proxy? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: There have been some messages going around about the template needing a fix for this. Per this link (https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c) from one of the messages you can try the following on the ssvm itself: apt-get update apt-get -y install openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-lib apt-get -y remove openjdk-6-jre-headless then you may also need to: service cloud stop sleep 3 service cloud start try the ssvm-check again after that. My understanding is that this is not a permanent fix, but should get you going for now. On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: I found this in the cloud.out log in the SSVM: Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: com.cloud.agent.AgentShell. Program will exit. It seems to have to do with a Java version mismatch. I'm using JDK 7 on both the management server and hypervisor but the SSVM is using version 6. Is this the most current system VM template? http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh First DNS server is 192.168.100.2 PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.227 ms 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.882 ms --- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.882/1.054/1.227/0.173 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com ERROR: NFS is not currently mounted Try manually mounting from inside the VM NFS server is 169.254.1.0 PING 169.254.1.0 (169.254.1.0): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms --- 169.254.1.0 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.039/0.053/0.067/0.000 ms Good: Can ping nfs server Management server is 192.168.101.3. Checking connectivity. Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. It says the NFS server is 169.254.1.0 which is the SSVM's link local address. How did it decide that? During the zone configuration I specified virthost1.lax.ratespecial.com as the NFS server and that resolves to 192.168.101.4. Also, in what path does it expect the NFS volume to be mounted? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: If the template is not ready then your ssvm may be having problems downloading it. Have you followed the info here:
Re: basic zone setup
Look at the tables changed in the last section of this gist: https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: Do you know which MySQL tables need to be updated to reference the new template? I'm worried that if I miss one the system will break unexpectedly the next time I launch a system VM. It might be worthwhile for me to simply reinstall the entire thing to be certain everything's set up correctly. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, if you don't want to reinstall/re-seed the system vm template, you should also download the new ones and do the mysql queries so that it is used for any future system vm deployments. Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: Yes, that makes the ssvm-check pass all the tests. Thanks. Should I repeat that upgrade with the console proxy? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: There have been some messages going around about the template needing a fix for this. Per this link ( https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c) from one of the messages you can try the following on the ssvm itself: apt-get update apt-get -y install openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-lib apt-get -y remove openjdk-6-jre-headless then you may also need to: service cloud stop sleep 3 service cloud start try the ssvm-check again after that. My understanding is that this is not a permanent fix, but should get you going for now. On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: I found this in the cloud.out log in the SSVM: Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: com.cloud.agent.AgentShell. Program will exit. It seems to have to do with a Java version mismatch. I'm using JDK 7 on both the management server and hypervisor but the SSVM is using version 6. Is this the most current system VM template? http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ian Young iyo...@ratespecial.com wrote: root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh First DNS server is 192.168.100.2 PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.227 ms 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.882 ms --- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.882/1.054/1.227/0.173 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com ERROR: NFS is not currently mounted Try manually mounting from inside the VM NFS server is 169.254.1.0 PING 169.254.1.0 (169.254.1.0): 48 data bytes 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms --- 169.254.1.0 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.039/0.053/0.067/0.000 ms Good: Can ping nfs server Management server is 192.168.101.3. Checking connectivity. Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. It says the NFS server is 169.254.1.0 which is the SSVM's link local address. How did it decide that? During the zone configuration I specified virthost1.lax.ratespecial.com as the NFS server and that
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Pierre-Luc DION root@s-48-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 3 Wed Jul 23 14:18:46 UTC 2014 -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:17:53 -0400 Dean, Could you post the content of /etc/cloudstack-version from a running systemvm ? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
That's the wrong ACS 4.4 release. Use systemvm64template-4.4.0-6 Erik On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Pierre-Luc DION root@s-48-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 3 Wed Jul 23 14:18:46 UTC 2014 -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:17:53 -0400 Dean, Could you post the content of /etc/cloudstack-version from a running systemvm ? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
ok I understand what is the problem, The proper templates to use with CloudStack 4.4.0 have 4.4.0-6 in their named. to know if you run the proper template cat of /etc/cloudstack-release of a systemvm-template will display a 4.4.0 as version. Otherwise, the systemvm template run java 1.6 which does not work with acs4.4.0. Unfortunately their is other version of system template http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4 which cause confusion. The installation doc ( http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html#management-server-installation) is up to date :-) PL On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Pierre-Luc DION root@s-48-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 3 Wed Jul 23 14:18:46 UTC 2014 -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:17:53 -0400 Dean, Could you post the content of /etc/cloudstack-version from a running systemvm ? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks
Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM.
Matthew, that is a bug in that distribution of the systemvm templates Where did you get them? the ones at cloudstack.apt-get.eu with the name 4.4.0-6 are the ones you should use. @rayees: can you update the ones at download.cloud.com, please? regards, Daan On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Midgett cst...@trickhosting.biz wrote: Pierre-Luc DION root@s-48-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 3 Wed Jul 23 14:18:46 UTC 2014 -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:17:53 -0400 Dean, Could you post the content of /etc/cloudstack-version from a running systemvm ? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, Thanks for your feedback, I would like to double check the version of SSVM template name you are currently using, could you please share info? Another question, I'm gussing that 0b1ff1bc054860378f08347 is the UUID of your secondary storage, is that correct? Thanks -- Daan
Re: forcing an IP to a VM
Hi Juan, When you deploy a new VM, if you use the API you specify the IP the VM should use. If the VM has already been deployed, you can update the DB VR then restart networking on the VM so it picks up the new IP. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:33, Juan Gomez Aranzazu j.gome...@uniandes.edu.comailto:j.gome...@uniandes.edu.co wrote: Hi everybody, Can anyone help me telling me how to Force a VM that its on an advance zone to use a predefine IP address. I had a vm that got corrupted and didn't want to start anymore, so i created a second VM but i need to assign to it the same IP that i had in the old VM how can i accomplish this?. Do i just make the change in the database?. Thank you for your help. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Unable to start a VM due to insufficient capacity
Ugo,
Looks like CS is failing to update the VR with details for the new VM, try
restarting the VR.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540
| M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com |
www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N
4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37
On 31 Jul 2014, at 15:40, Ugo Vasi
ugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it wrote:
Hi everybody,
I installed a CloudStack 4.3.0 system with a manager (in a virtual machine),
two NFS primary storage, one NFS secondary storare and two host agent on ubuntu
distribution.
The cluster have one advanced zone without security group configuration with
KVM hipervisors.
I create some VM but now does not allow me to create more giving the error
message Unable to start a VM due to insufficient capacity.
I am sure that the resources (ip, ram, cpu and storage) are enough to create
new instances. In dashboard I see all ok.
From the management-server.log I see this errors messages (see attachment for
full version) when I try to deploy a new virtual machine with 1x1GHz cpu, 1GB
or RAM and 20GB disk space:
2014-07-31 14:59:11,983 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-12:null)
Seq 1-684594119: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 77916390353436, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:false,details:VmDataCommand
failed, check agent logs,wait:0}}] }
2014-07-31 14:59:11,983 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) Unable to contact resource.
com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [DataCenter:1] is
unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router
2014-07-31 14:59:12,453 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Starting
to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: 7
2014-07-31 14:59:12,677 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Starting
to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,708 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) Destroying vm VM[User|csweb2] as it
failed to create on Host with Id:null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,738 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38 ctx-d8600c16) VM state transitted from :Stopped
to Error with event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host
id: null host id before state transition: null
2014-07-31 14:59:12,929 WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38
ctx-d8600c16) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId::
null // message:: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 70, on Host with Id: null
2014-07-31 14:59:13,159 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38) Unexpected exception while executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to start a VM due to
insufficient capacity
Caused by: com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
create a deployment for VM[User|csweb2]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
id=1
2014-07-31 14:59:13,161 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-26:ctx-ab3aee38) Complete async job-783, jobStatus: FAILED,
resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{uuidList:[],errorcode:530,errortext:Unable
to start a VM due to insufficient capacity}
2014-07-31 14:59:46,280 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-27:ctx-82be396e ctx-41f0cf24) Stopped called on VM[User|csweb2]
but the state is Error
2014-07-31 14:59:46,330 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-27:ctx-82be396e ctx-41f0cf24) VM state transitted from :Error to
Expunging with event: DestroyRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id:
null host id before state transition: null
I tried to search in others log file (VmDataCommand failed, check agent
logs), but I don't found nothing...
Can anyone Help me?
--
U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it
P r o c n e s.r.l)
via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT
phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e
confidenziali ed ? vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita.
Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio ?
destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene
gentilmente comunicazione.
Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare
supp...@procne.itmailto:supp...@procne.it .
Rif. D.L. 196/2003
Re: forcing an IP to a VM
Thank you Geoff Enviado desde mi iPhone El 31/07/2014, a las 14:53, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com escribió: Hi Juan, When you deploy a new VM, if you use the API you specify the IP the VM should use. If the VM has already been deployed, you can update the DB VR then restart networking on the VM so it picks up the new IP. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:33, Juan Gomez Aranzazu j.gome...@uniandes.edu.comailto:j.gome...@uniandes.edu.co wrote: Hi everybody, Can anyone help me telling me how to Force a VM that its on an advance zone to use a predefine IP address. I had a vm that got corrupted and didn't want to start anymore, so i created a second VM but i need to assign to it the same IP that i had in the old VM how can i accomplish this?. Do i just make the change in the database?. Thank you for your help. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Email asegurado por Check Point
Re: forcing an IP to a VM
In which database table should the change be done ? Enviado desde mi iPhone El 31/07/2014, a las 14:53, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com escribió: Hi Juan, When you deploy a new VM, if you use the API you specify the IP the VM should use. If the VM has already been deployed, you can update the DB VR then restart networking on the VM so it picks up the new IP. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:33, Juan Gomez Aranzazu j.gome...@uniandes.edu.comailto:j.gome...@uniandes.edu.co wrote: Hi everybody, Can anyone help me telling me how to Force a VM that its on an advance zone to use a predefine IP address. I had a vm that got corrupted and didn't want to start anymore, so i created a second VM but i need to assign to it the same IP that i had in the old VM how can i accomplish this?. Do i just make the change in the database?. Thank you for your help. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Email asegurado por Check Point
awsapi vs ec2stack
Anyone out there using or have experience either/both of these that can comment on pros and cons? Previously I was unsuccessful at getting awsapi working on 4.1 and only just today found out about ec2stack. I was going to give it another try now that I am on 4.4 on one of my setups and was wondering if anyone had any comments/thoughts on these two options. thanks, Carlos
Running the cloudstack in simulator
Hello All, I am trying to run CS simulator (master branch latest). This setup is on cygwin running on Windows 8.1. Here is the error I am encountering: $ mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin integration-test [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack marvin 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-marvin --- Downloading: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/cloudstack/checkstyle/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- gmaven-plugin:1.5:execute (setproperty) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (generate-sources) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) @ cloud-marvin --- Traceback (most recent call last): File deployAndRun.py, line 24, in module from marvinInit import MarvinInit File /home/abhisekb/cloudstack/tools/marvin/marvin/marvinInit.py, line 28, in module from marvin.marvinLog import MarvinLog File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/marvinLog.py, line 28, in module from marvin.lib.utils import random_gen File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/lib/utils.py, line 34, in module from marvin.sshClient import SshClient File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/sshClient.py, line 18, in module from paramiko import (BadHostKeyException, File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paramiko/__init__.py, line 31, in module from paramiko.transport import SecurityOptions, Transport File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paramiko/transport.py, line 55, in module from paramiko.ecdsakey import ECDSAKey File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paramiko/ecdsakey.py, line 26, in module from ecdsa import SigningKey, VerifyingKey, der, curves ImportError: No module named ecdsa [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 50.043 s [INFO] Finished at: 2014-08-01T09:42:31+05:30 [INFO] Final Memory: 47M/118M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException Can someone help here? Regards, Abhisek
RE: Running the cloudstack in simulator
When I tried the below mentined command with -X; more detailed error: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 14.700 s [INFO] Finished at: 2014-08-01T10:07:18+05:30 [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/118M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) - [Help 1] org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:216) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:116) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:80) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.singlethreaded.SingleThreadedBuilder.build(SingleThreadedBuilder.java:51) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleStarter.execute(LifecycleStarter.java:120) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:347) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:154) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.execute(MavenCli.java:584) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.doMain(MavenCli.java:213) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:157) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:289) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:229) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:415) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:356) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Command execution failed. at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.execute(ExecMojo.java:362) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:132) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:208) ... 19 more Caused by: org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) at org.apache.commons.exec.DefaultExecutor.executeInternal(DefaultExecutor.java:377) at org.apache.commons.exec.DefaultExecutor.execute(DefaultExecutor.java:160) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.executeCommandLine(ExecMojo.java:610) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.execute(ExecMojo.java:352) ... 21 more Any one? Regards, Abhisek Basu From: abhisekb...@msn.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Running the cloudstack in simulator Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 04:35:21 + Hello All, I am trying to run CS simulator (master branch latest). This setup is on cygwin running on Windows 8.1. Here is the error I am encountering: $ mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin integration-test [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack marvin 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-marvin --- Downloading: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/cloudstack/checkstyle/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- gmaven-plugin:1.5:execute (setproperty) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (generate-sources) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) @ cloud-marvin --- Traceback (most recent call last): File deployAndRun.py, line 24, in module from marvinInit import MarvinInit File
RE: Running the cloudstack in simulator
Below error suggests, you dont have a specific module. please use python 2.7.x(specifically 6) and then try. ImportError: No module named ecdsa Instead of going that route, just follow the below link, but for this as well, you need relevant packages for python. If you install marvin, it will install dependent packages. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Validating+check-ins+for+your+local+changes,+using+Simulator santhosh From: abhisek basu [abhisekb...@msn.com] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 1:15 AM To: CloudStack-Users Subject: RE: Running the cloudstack in simulator When I tried the below mentined command with -X; more detailed error: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 14.700 s [INFO] Finished at: 2014-08-01T10:07:18+05:30 [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/118M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) - [Help 1] org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:216) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:116) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:80) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.singlethreaded.SingleThreadedBuilder.build(SingleThreadedBuilder.java:51) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleStarter.execute(LifecycleStarter.java:120) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:347) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:154) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.execute(MavenCli.java:584) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.doMain(MavenCli.java:213) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:157) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:289) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:229) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:415) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:356) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Command execution failed. at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.execute(ExecMojo.java:362) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:132) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:208) ... 19 more Caused by: org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) at org.apache.commons.exec.DefaultExecutor.executeInternal(DefaultExecutor.java:377) at org.apache.commons.exec.DefaultExecutor.execute(DefaultExecutor.java:160) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.executeCommandLine(ExecMojo.java:610) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecMojo.execute(ExecMojo.java:352) ... 21 more Any one? Regards, Abhisek Basu From: abhisekb...@msn.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Running the cloudstack in simulator Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 04:35:21 + Hello All, I am trying to run CS simulator (master branch latest). This setup is on cygwin running on Windows 8.1. Here is the error I am encountering: $ mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin integration-test [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack marvin 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-marvin --- Downloading: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/cloudstack/checkstyle/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
lxc on cloudstack
Hello,
I am stacking about cloudstack + lxc.
what I did is
Ubuntu 14.04 trusty, cloudstack 4.4 installed from
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/
create management node - fine
add kvm cluster - fine
add kvm agent - fine
create second storage vm, console vm - fine
add lxc cluster - fine
add lxc agent - seems to be fine
add lxc instance adding iso - .
log is below.
is anyone able to create lxc instance on cloudstack?
what is the mean 'they are not HVM enabled' ?
please tell me how to create lxc.
Thank you.
2014-08-01 13:08:43,304 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:56, userId:
2, accountId: 2, instanceType: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 3, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdByAdmin, cmdInfo:
{serviceofferingid:ca9ec6a0-10e3-4101-9b4e-32da49929397,sessionkey:ZXZElEJY2wGlUjbYc8mYMTjEKDU\u003d,cmdEventType:VM.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,zoneid:e32f5ae1-5a01-4f44-b4ae-cc09419efd11,httpmethod:GET,templateid:60a6ae31-3690-4122-8cbe-ad106f18679f,response:json,id:3,ctxDetails:{\com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate\:\60a6ae31-3690-4122-8cbe-ad106f18679f\,\com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachine\:\f362e2be-e7a7-40a6-9388-556e95583d0b\,\com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering\:\842daf1f-bfd5-425b-a6f3-3f6fa06fd90a\,\com.cloud.dc.DataCenter\:\e32f5ae1-5a01-4f44-b4ae-cc09419efd11\,\com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering\:\ca9ec6a0-10e3-4101-9b4e-32da49929397\},hypervisor:L
XC,iptonetworklist[0].networkid:c220e198-baf3-419d-b561-dddb2b79540a,_:1406866122712,uuid:f362e2be-e7a7-40a6-9388-556e95583d0b,ctxAccountId:2,diskofferingid:842daf1f-bfd5-425b-a6f3-3f6fa06fd90a,ctxStartEventId:147},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 109955820418, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-08-01 13:08:43,405 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Service SecurityGroup is
not supported in the network id=208
2014-08-01 13:08:43,408 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Service SecurityGroup is
not supported in the network id=208
2014-08-01 13:08:43,427 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Deploy avoids pods: [],
clusters: [], hosts: []
2014-08-01 13:08:43,428 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) DeploymentPlanner
allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner@5e99834a
2014-08-01 13:08:43,428 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Trying to allocate a
host and storage pools from dc:2, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500,
requested ram: 536870912
2014-08-01 13:08:43,428 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Is ROOT volume READY
(pool already allocated)?: No
2014-08-01 13:08:43,429 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Searching all possible
resources under this Zone: 2
2014-08-01 13:08:43,430 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Listing clusters in
order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and
RAM capacity under this Zone: 2
2014-08-01 13:08:43,433 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Removing from the
clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: []
2014-08-01 13:08:43,439 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7) Checking resources in
Cluster: 3 under Pod: 2
2014-08-01 13:08:43,439 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)
Looking for hosts in dc: 2 pod:2 cluster:3
2014-08-01 13:08:43,441 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)
FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-5-Routing]]
2014-08-01 13:08:43,443 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)
Not considering hosts: [Host[-5-Routing]] to deploy template:
Tmpl[201-ISO-201-2-e9eacfcd-1360-3e1d-8b5b-497997678249 as they are not HVM
enabled
2014-08-01 13:08:43,444 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)
Found 0 hosts for allocation after prioritization: []
2014-08-01 13:08:43,444 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)
Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=512
2014-08-01 13:08:43,444 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(API-Job-Executor-52:ctx-0f32ce3a job-56 ctx-f436dcd7
Re: forcing an IP to a VM
I dint have a system in front of me at the moment to confirm (on vacation) but from memory I think it's the NICS table Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguruhttps://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 31 Jul 2014, at 21:09, Juan Gomez juan.go...@kumo.com.comailto:juan.go...@kumo.com.co wrote: In which database table should the change be done ? Enviado desde mi iPhone El 31/07/2014, a las 14:53, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com escribi?: Hi Juan, When you deploy a new VM, if you use the API you specify the IP the VM should use. If the VM has already been deployed, you can update the DB VR then restart networking on the VM so it picks up the new IP. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:33, Juan Gomez Aranzazu j.gome...@uniandes.edu.comailto:j.gome...@uniandes.edu.comailto:j.gome...@uniandes.edu.co wrote: Hi everybody, Can anyone help me telling me how to Force a VM that its on an advance zone to use a predefine IP address. I had a vm that got corrupted and didn't want to start anymore, so i created a second VM but i need to assign to it the same IP that i had in the old VM how can i accomplish this?. Do i just make the change in the database?. Thank you for your help. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Email asegurado por Check Point Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
