Hi,
Redundant Router is supported only in a zone with advanced networking with Vlan
isolation. Also SourceNat is mandatory for RVR.
Best Regards,
Sanjeev N
Chief Product Engineer, Accelerite
Off: +91 40 6722 9368 | EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From:
Check /etc/cloudstack-releases file inside system vms to know the system
template version after system vm upgrades.
Check MS log to know the reasons for VR upgrade failure.
Best Regards,
Sanjeev N
Chief Product Engineer, Accelerite
Off: +91 40 6722 9368 | EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
Hi Sam,
Thanks for your reply.
Connection to MS is OK, since SSVM works fine. Problem seems to be isolated
to the VR. I am using KVM hypervisor. Testing the upgrade again now and
will update the result.
Cheers.
-ip-
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Sam Ceylani
Hi Sam,
Thanks for your reply.
My SSVM and CPVM seems to work fine -- although I can't verify if they are
really using the new template or not, but my VR doesn't work even after I
destroy the VR and restart the network with clean-up option. So the VR is
never able to be started up after the
Same thing happened to me, upgrading from 4.5.2 to 4.8 and I had to restart
network with clean-up option checked for each network which rebuilds the router
VM. If your SSVM works
And if you can test it then I don’t see any problem rebuilding network(router
vm) with new template which took
Dear all,
Could it be the VR is not able to use the new systemVM template because we
registered the template as Routing = NO? Will it resolve the problem if
during upgrade, we register the template as Routing = YES?
Based on the upgrade instruction at
退订
iPhone
退订
yixunj,您好!
退订是需要全体人员投票三分之二以上通过的。
=== 2016-06-08 07:23:20 您在来信中写道:===
>
>给个理由
>
>谢谢!
>
>> 在 2016年6月7日,22:24,起观照智 <764427...@qq.com> 写道:
>>
>> 不予批准
>>
>> -- 原始邮件 --
>> 发件人: "yixunj" ;
>> 发送时间: 2016年6月7日(星期二) 15:36
>> 收件人:
On 06/07/2016 18:26, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> Which version of CloudStack are you on Andy? The bug seems to have been fixed
> in 4.2 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2337 [1]), but we
> recently came across it again in 4.6 - with a fix appearing in 4.6.2
>
Which version of CloudStack are you on Andy? The bug seems to have been fixed
in 4.2 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2337), but we recently
came across it again in 4.6 - with a fix appearing in 4.6.2
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9101).
Regards,
Dag
We're using 4.8, with Xen as the hypervisor.
We're finding that only the Admin account can adjust the size of a root
volume. Domain Admins and User accounts aren't given the option to
resize the volume. I have the same storage tag on all of the disk
offerings, and on the primary storage.
不予批准
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "丁晓东" ;
发送时间: 2016年6月7日(星期二) 13:56
收件人: "users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org" ;
主题: 退订
退订
不予批准
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "yixunj" ;
发送时间: 2016年6月7日(星期二) 15:36
收件人: "users-cn" ;
主题: 退订
退订
谢谢!
Hi Marcus,
I don't have any support becuase is did this installation on dedicated
servers, they don't provide support for cloudstack.
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Marc-Andre Jutras [mailto:mar...@marcuspocus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 4:36 PM
To:
yes I did...
So something is wrong on your setup, Still trying to figure it out what
is wrong...
Do you have any support from you service provider ? if so, try to check
with them if there's anything they can do...
Marcus
On 2016-06-05 1:28 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote:
Hi Marcus,
You need to open a ticket. Function does not work.
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201605.mbox/%3c1758309532.2299279.1463265113050.javamail.zim...@arhont.com%3E
2016-06-07 3:58 GMT+03:00 ilya :
> I see in the code setCacheMode for KVM is
18 matches
Mail list logo