Re: Cloudstack High Availability(HA) Testing

Hi, Thanks for the update Simon, Boris. I will check the mentioned URLs. -Kurt On 05/15/2017 08:48 PM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: Hi Kurt, Earlier this ear we’ve worked on KVM Host-HA feature which basically offers a proper fencing for ipmi 2.0 compliant hosts and works with VM-ha as well, so

Re: Cloudstack High Availability(HA) Testing

Hi Kurt, Earlier this ear we’ve worked on KVM Host-HA feature which basically offers a proper fencing for ipmi 2.0 compliant hosts and works with VM-ha as well, so if you have a failed host or even shut down the Host-HA framework will try to recover it and if it fail will fencing (issue IPMI

Re: Cloudstack High Availability(HA) Testing

Kurt, By default, ACS will not HA VMs due to a host failure, as ACS assumes the storage could still be mounted (machine isn't cleanly fenced off). Deleting the host from ACS should trigger a failover of the VMs. There's a lot of work in progress to deal with this a lot more gracefully. A few

Re: LXC support (limits)

I'm not very familiar with the lxc-integration, but I would suggest checking out the container service ShapeBlue has created. http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-container-service/ -- Erik On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Vladimir Melnik wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Had

LXC support (limits)

Dear colleagues, Had anyone succeeded at limiting an LXC-instance that has been deployed by ACS? On a CentOS-7-based host the VM can use all the CPU cores and all the storage. Is that possible to limit at least the storage usage? Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! -- V.Melnik