Re: [DKIM-AUTHFAIL]Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

[Vijay Sachdeva]

Hi Rajesh,

Thanks for the intervention.Since you have copied Mr. Jaydeep and Mr. Lianghwa 
to work on this issue, so let’s working on this.

Thanks

Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation


A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019 
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com 

> On 23-Jun-2017, at 10:01 AM, Rajesh Ramchandani 
>  wrote:
> 
> Vijay - please discuss with our team @ Accelerite. We will be happy to help. 
> I have copied Jaydeep and Lianghwa who will work with you. We are already 
> working with Citrix Netscler ream
> 
> Raj
> 
> From: Vijay Sachdeva 
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:58:32 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DKIM-AUTHFAIL]Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack
> 
> Hey anyone who can revert me on this, please..!!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Vijay Sachdeva
> Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation
> 
> 
> A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
> 24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
> www.indiqus.com
> 
> On 21-Jun-2017, at 6:08 PM, Vijay Sachdeva 
> > wrote:
> 
> Dear Team,
> 
> I am trying to integrate Citrix Netscaler with Cloudstack 4.9, getting 
> following error while adding:-
> 
> "Failed to log in to Netscaler device at 192.168.3.159 due to Received fatal 
> alert: handshake_failure"
> 
> 
> While adding Netscaler device it asks for Public interface and Private 
> Interface, need to understand what’s that in Netscaler?  Is it like adding 
> two more virtual interfaces to Netscalaer device?
> 
> 
> Right now there is only one management IP on it, do I need to add two more 
> interfaces?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vijay Sachdeva
> Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation
> 
> 
> A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
> 24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
> www.indiqus.com
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
> print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of 
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any 
> liability for virus infected mails.

Re: [DKIM-AUTHFAIL]Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

[Rajesh Ramchandani]

Vijay - please discuss with our team @ Accelerite. We will be happy to help. I 
have copied Jaydeep and Lianghwa who will work with you. We are already working 
with Citrix Netscler ream

Raj

From: Vijay Sachdeva 
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:58:32 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DKIM-AUTHFAIL]Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

Hey anyone who can revert me on this, please..!!

Thanks

Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation


A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com

On 21-Jun-2017, at 6:08 PM, Vijay Sachdeva 
> wrote:

Dear Team,

I am trying to integrate Citrix Netscaler with Cloudstack 4.9, getting 
following error while adding:-

"Failed to log in to Netscaler device at 192.168.3.159 due to Received fatal 
alert: handshake_failure"


While adding Netscaler device it asks for Public interface and Private 
Interface, need to understand what’s that in Netscaler?  Is it like adding two 
more virtual interfaces to Netscalaer device?


Right now there is only one management IP on it, do I need to add two more 
interfaces?




Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation


A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com


DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Cloudstack 4.9 fails to start system VMs

[Taylor]

Hello.


I am trying to do a basic install but the system vms never start. They appear 
to be stuck in a starting state.


My logs are as follows:



[root@cloudstack ~]# tail -f 
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log | grep -i -E 
'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
2017-06-22 21:02:44,504 WARN  [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Empty console proxy domain, explicitly 
disabling SSL
2017-06-22 21:02:44,540 WARN  [c.c.s.d.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Only realhostip.com ssl cert is 
supported, ignoring self-signed and other certs
2017-06-22 21:02:46,506 ERROR [c.c.u.PropertiesUtil] 
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Unable to find properties file: 
commands.properties
2017-06-22 21:02:55,791 INFO  [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerConnectionPool] 
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) XenServer Connection Pool Configs: 
sleep.interval.on.error=1
2017-06-22 21:02:58,660 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] 
(Cluster-Notification-1:ctx-3d0b1cac) (logid:9146a1c1)  alertType:: 14 // 
dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // clusterId:: null // message:: Management 
server node 10.4.5.1 is up
2017-06-22 21:02:59,381 WARN  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] 
(Cluster-Notification-1:ctx-3d0b1cac) (logid:9146a1c1) Notifying management 
server join event took 735 ms
2017-06-22 21:30:09,592 DEBUG [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] 
(Cluster-Heartbeat-1:ctx-b14a2bb9) (logid:c9a4e195) Peer scan takes too long to 
finish. profiler: Done. Duration: 4862ms, profilerQueryActiveList: Done. 
Duration: 4861ms, profilerSyncClusterInfo: Done. Duration: 0ms, 
profilerInvalidatedNodeList: Done. Duration: 0ms, profilerRemovedList: Done. 
Duration: 0ms
2017-06-22 22:02:57,770 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-1:ctx-5ba8c378) 
(logid:82b60ca7)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:12:56,217 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-1:ctx-58d79fd5) 
(logid:a3d6c010)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:22:56,221 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-2:ctx-622bd3c9) 
(logid:98d2c185)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:32:56,217 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-1:ctx-0760401f) 
(logid:7b7a8104)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:42:56,217 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-1:ctx-9dd2cbd0) 
(logid:c9c3b276)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:52:56,217 WARN  [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-1:ctx-f6b399cb) 
(logid:73d23c5c)  alertType:: 13 // dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // 
clusterId:: null // message:: No usage server process running
2017-06-22 22:55:31,317 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-724755da ctx-0ea77950) (logid:d415ff05) Received unknown 
parameters for command addHost. Unknown parameters : clustertype
2017-06-22 22:55:32,614 WARN  [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-724755da ctx-0ea77950) (logid:d415ff05) defaulting to 
xenserver650 resource for product brand: XenServer with product version: 6.5.0
2017-06-22 22:55:32,642 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-724755da ctx-0ea77950) (logid:d415ff05) Failed to retrive 
the default label for storage traffic:zone: 1 hypervisor: XenServer due 
to:Unable to find the default physical network with traffic=Storage in the 
specified zone id
2017-06-22 22:55:34,392 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-724755da ctx-0ea77950) (logid:d415ff05) SSH execution of 
command xe sm-list | grep "resigning of duplicates" has an error status code in 
return. Result output:
2017-06-22 22:55:35,618 WARN  [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-724755da ctx-0ea77950) (logid:d415ff05) defaulting to 
xenserver650 resource for product brand: XenServer with product version: 6.5.0
2017-06-22 22:57:35,906 WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-1:ctx-a794052b) (logid:3e731ac5) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 1
2017-06-22 22:57:35,908 WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-1:ctx-a794052b) (logid:3e731ac5) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 2
2017-06-22 22:58:35,902 WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-3:ctx-fcbf36da) (logid:b36ad1b5) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 1
2017-06-22 22:58:35,910 WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-3:ctx-fcbf36da) (logid:b36ad1b5) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 2
2017-06-22 22:59:35,893 WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-2:ctx-3bead64a) (logid:736e1311) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 1

Re: some issues after upgrade cloudstack to 4.9.2

[Sebastian Gomez]

The problem over upload from local and the problem with the console proxy
were not a problem with cloudstack, was a problem of our network
configuration.

As I told before, we have public IPs and private IPs routed into the
backbone network, so used as "public" IPs also, both mixed.
The systemvm since 4.6 has a script /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config which
now creates routes for private networks (10.x, 172.16.x, 192.168.x) if the
public network is really public. In our case it was a problem, because the
public network for the cloud service is really public, but our
WorkingStations have private IPs (10.x). In this case, when the console
proxy starts, there is a new route for 10.x network over the management
interface, and the connection can't be stablished. The traffic from our
stations comes from public interface and return through the management
network (and is not routed).

We solved the problem tunning this script, commenting the line "ip route
add 10.0.0.0/8 via $LOCAL_GW".

About the problem with upload from local, the reason is that we have not
well passed the certificates on our PRE environment, where we have tested
the upgrade.

Finally we have successfully executed the upgrade process, but with more
work than just the public process... But really, if everything were easy,
life would be boring!


Regads.




Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Marc Poll Garcia <
marc.poll.gar...@upcnet.es> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> we have just upgraded our cloud environment based on Cloudstack 4.5.2 to
> 4.9.2 and we're expriencing some issues after this.
>
> Our setup is the following one:
>
> - 1 x cloudstack managment server
> - 1 x bbdd server cloudstack database on it
> - 2 x Vmware Hipervisors (hosts)
>
> I'm performing a list of tests:
>
> *- Sometimes, and randomly console from instances does not load.*
> *- Not possible to upload template from local.*
>
> We see the following on log:
>
> 2017-05-25 09:00:31,665 ERROR [c.c.s.ImageStoreUploadMonitorImpl]
> (Upload-Monitor-1:ctx-0b3bf6e9) (logid:e9c82a0f) *Template
> b87459ac-8fbe-4b34-ae25-21235c3fcd1d failed to upload due to operation
> timed out*
> 2017-05-25 09:02:18,265 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterServiceServletContainer]
> (Thread-11:null) (logid:) *Unexpected exception *
> 2017-05-25 09:03:35,940 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) *Unable to ping management server at 192.168.100.2:9090
>  due to ConnectException*
>
>
> Why is it happening?
> It does not happen on our old 4.5.2 version.
>
> Is there any way to fix it? changing any global parameter or permissions
> issue?
>
> We need a clue with that because if affecting to our production
> environment.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kind regards.
>

Re: Cloud Utilization

[Sebastian Gomez]

First of all, what means "instance utilization is 0%", just kernel
processes and maintenance tasks can increase CPU usage during this period.
No utilization means no logins?

I don't know any service/soft that do it, but you can do it yourself:

For example:
You can easily develop a script to be executed daily on each server to
detect if there is or not usage (whatever it means), and register into a
file (p.e. a counter). One the counter reaches the maximum (p.e. 3 days),
shutdown itself.
For other side, develop a script in other server to make queries on the
cloud database or cloud usage database to ask for instances which have more
than maximum days without being powered on, and call the API method to
destroy them.

Thinking about it I'm sure that people will find better ways to do it.
If you build the solution, please, consider sharing it!


Good luck.






Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev 
wrote:

> Hello, Ghaith.
>
> I think ACS doesn't support this easily, but It still can be achieved. The
> second part of your demand is quite simple and probably can be achieved
> with just API VM list call and additional information from the database,
> but the first one is out of ACS features obviosly.
>
> I just would like to direct you to a half-step solution which can be
> extended to achieve desired outcome.
> I don't know what hypervisor you use, but our the solution is for KVM.
>
> Take a look at https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-sensor - this is libvirt
> sensor which stores metrics for all VMs to the InfluxDB database which
> later can be asked for time-series like "show me VMs with low CPU
> utilization for a period of time" and further stop that VM with API. We
> also have https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-server/tree/develop which shows
> how to request the database and get CPU utilization results.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't use other hypervisors and they probably require
> other sensors than libvirt.
>
> So, finally, it's not so difficult to implement the feature you need but
> requires a custom development.
> Still, if you need that custom development, please contact me and we can
> discuss.
>
>
> 2017-06-14 13:28 GMT+07:00 Ghaith Bannoura :
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have a case that I need to turn off instance in case that the instance
> > utilization is 0%  for three days ( the instance is not used ) and
> destroy
> > the instance if its stopped more than 7 days .
> >
> > Is there any automated way to do like this case (like Ansible) , I
> believe
> > that auto scaling while handle turn off instance , but I need another
> > solution
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ghaith Bannoura
> > Senior System Administrator
> > MCT, MCSE (Messaging, Server Infrastructure)
> > MCSA (Windows Server 2008, 2012), MCP
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 
>

RE: Recreating SystemVM's

[Jeremy Peterson]

1.   I downloaded the system template because my system template vm's were 
not launching so I downloaded it thinking something might be off.

2.   '1', 'routing-1', 'SystemVM Template (XenServer)', 
'8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662', '0', '0', 'SYSTEM', '0', '64', 
'http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2', 
'VHD', '2015-02-23 09:35:05', NULL, '1', '2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241', 
'SystemVM Template (XenServer)', '0', '0', '184', '1', '0', '1', '0', 
'XenServer', NULL, NULL, '0', '2689602048', 'Active', '0', NULL, '0'

a.   Ok so that tells me that my template id is 1

3.

a.   '53', '5', '1', '2015-04-13 12:50:37', NULL, NULL, '100', 
'DOWNLOADED', NULL, 'ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf', 
'ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf', '0', '0', 'Ready', '2', '2015-04-13 
13:16:11'

b.  '52', '6', '1', '2015-04-13 12:50:31', NULL, NULL, '100', 'DOWNLOADED', 
NULL, 'bed64043-2208-415c-ad32-02ffeb4802d7', 
'bed64043-2208-415c-ad32-02ffeb4802d7', '0', '0', 'Ready', '2', '2015-04-13 
13:14:51'

c.   '57', '7', '1', '2015-04-21 22:21:44', NULL, NULL, '100', 
'DOWNLOADED', NULL, 'f2bbd9ea-3237-4119-8c03-8c0c570d153b', 
'f2bbd9ea-3237-4119-8c03-8c0c570d153b', '0', '0', 'Ready', '2', '2015-04-21 
22:22:40'

d.  '86', '8', '1', '2015-06-25 18:52:57', NULL, NULL, '100', 'DOWNLOADED', 
NULL, 'd4085d91-22fa-4965-bfa7-d1a1800f6aa7', 
'd4085d91-22fa-4965-bfa7-d1a1800f6aa7', '0', '0', 'Ready', '2', '2015-06-25 
18:54:05'

   i.  This is 
from select * from cloud.template_spool_ref where template_id=1;

 ii.  In my 
logs I can see the third template.



2017-06-22 09:23:49,103 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(Work-Job-Executor-117:ctx-03e815cd job-1042/job-154364 ctx-0c08652e) Seq 
18-3646226848309841098: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 
18(Flex-Xen5.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"f2bbd9ea-3237-4119-8c03-8c0c570d153b","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662","id":1,"format":"VHD","accountId":1,"checksum":"2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241","hvm":false,"displayText":"SystemVM
 Template 
(XenServer)","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN1-LUN1","id":7,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN1-LUN1","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN1-LUN1/?ROLE=Primary=FlexSAN1-LUN1"}},"name":"routing-1","hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"7726194f-821c-4df2-90cf-f61ac06a362d","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN1-LUN1","id":7,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN1-LUN1","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN1-LUN1/?ROLE=Primary=FlexSAN1-LUN1"}},"name":"ROOT-23819","size":2689602048,"volumeId":28738,"vmName":"s-23819-VM","accountId":1,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":28738,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"executeInSequence":true,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
 }

2017-06-22 09:23:49,103 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(Work-Job-Executor-117:ctx-03e815cd job-1042/job-154364 ctx-0c08652e) Seq 
18-3646226848309841098: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 
18(Flex-Xen5.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"f2bbd9ea-3237-4119-8c03-8c0c570d153b","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662","id":1,"format":"VHD","accountId":1,"checksum":"2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241","hvm":false,"displayText":"SystemVM
 Template 
(XenServer)","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN1-LUN1","id":7,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN1-LUN1","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN1-LUN1/?ROLE=Primary=FlexSAN1-LUN1"}},"name":"routing-1","hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"7726194f-821c-4df2-90cf-f61ac06a362d","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN1-LUN1","id":7,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN1-LUN1","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN1-LUN1/?ROLE=Primary=FlexSAN1-LUN1"}},"name":"ROOT-23819","size":2689602048,"volumeId":28738,"vmName":"s-23819-VM","accountId":1,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":28738,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"executeInSequence":true,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
 }

2017-06-22 09:23:49,104 DEBUG 

Re: Recreating SystemVM's

[Dag Sonstebo]

1) You’ve not told us why you chose to redownload the system VM template – can 
you elaborate?
2) Can you run: “SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where name like '%system%' and 
hypervisor_type='XenServer';” 
3) “So after cleaning up the 5TB worth of data (last Friday)….” – did you check 
all your disk chains to ensure you didn’t wipe a base disk? If not then chances 
are you wiped a template disk CloudStack now thinks is there.
Check this in template_spool_ref – work out from point 2) above what your 
template ID is, as well as what your primary storage pool ID is, something like 
this: “SELECT * FROM cloud.template_spool_ref where template_id=XYZ and 
pool_id=12345;”
What is the downloaded state?
Check the install_path on your primary storage – does it exist?

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 22/06/2017, 15:14, "Jeremy Peterson"  wrote:

Sorry I am using 4.5.0 I mistyped my versions.

http://prntscr.com/fmuluj

My router.template.xenserver shows 
SystemVM Template (XenServer)

If I go Templates -> SystemVM Template (XenServer) the Status is Download 
Complete and Read shows Yes

This is the command I ran on my mananagement server to redownload systemvm 
template.

/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt 
-m /secondary -u 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2 -h 
xenserver -F

i-153-446-VM was a working VM that powered off during this whole set of 
problems and had not been able to power back online since.  The oddity is I get 
the error visually "insufficient capacity" yes during the call to start that VM 
it finds a valid host for Memory and CPU but then errors with UUID is invalid.  
I am more focused on SSVM and ConsoleProxyVM not starting at this time. As I 
have replaced i-153-446 with a new VM.  Now this is puzzling.  I can launch new 
VM's for ISO's and templates.

Display nametest-launch-from-template
Nametest-launch-from-template
State   Running
TemplateCentOS 7 40GB
Dynamically ScalableYes
OS Type CentOS 7
Hypervisor  XenServer
Attached ISO
Compute offering2vCPU,4GB RAM,HA
# of CPU Cores  2
CPU (in MHz)2000
Memory (in MB)  4096
VGPU
HA Enabled  Yes
Group   
Zone name   Rushford
HostFlex-Xen4.flexhost.local
Domain  ROOT
Account admin
Created 22 Jun 2017 08:33:30

I suspected storage a while back and noticed that the SSVM was recreating 
its 2.5GB disk over and over and over on all of my storage luns.  So after 
cleaning up the 5TB worth of data (last Friday) I don't see a storage issue 
with my SAN iscsi connections.

http://prntscr.com/fmus2i 

Again thanks Dag for your response here's to hoping some of that helps 
track down what's broke.

Whats killing me is the amount of logs.  It seems like its creating 
multiple system vm's at the same time


Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Dag Sonstebo [mailto:dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 6:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's

OK, you seem to have a handful of issues here.

1) You have stated at the start of this thread you are using CloudStack 
4.9.0 and XS6.5. 
In this log dump - https://pastebin.com/2DhzFVDZ - all your downloads are 
for 4.5 system VM templates, e.g.

2017-06-21 10:46:16,440 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(Work-Job-Executor-39:ctx-ca13c13b job-1042/job-147411 ctx-ebfa1fb6) Seq 
15-7914231920173516250: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 
15(Flex-Xen3.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid;
…

Your MySQL query confirms this:

- - -  

SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';

1   routing-1   SystemVM Template (XenServer)   
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2  
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241SystemVM Template (XenServer)   0   
0   184 1   0   1   0   XenServer   
0   2689602048  Active  0   0
3   routing-3   SystemVM Template (KVM) 
8a46062a-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2

RE: Recreating SystemVM's

[Jeremy Peterson]

Sorry I am using 4.5.0 I mistyped my versions.

http://prntscr.com/fmuluj

My router.template.xenserver shows 
SystemVM Template (XenServer)

If I go Templates -> SystemVM Template (XenServer) the Status is Download 
Complete and Read shows Yes

This is the command I ran on my mananagement server to redownload systemvm 
template.

/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt 
-m /secondary -u 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2 -h 
xenserver -F

i-153-446-VM was a working VM that powered off during this whole set of 
problems and had not been able to power back online since.  The oddity is I get 
the error visually "insufficient capacity" yes during the call to start that VM 
it finds a valid host for Memory and CPU but then errors with UUID is invalid.  
I am more focused on SSVM and ConsoleProxyVM not starting at this time. As I 
have replaced i-153-446 with a new VM.  Now this is puzzling.  I can launch new 
VM's for ISO's and templates.

Display nametest-launch-from-template
Nametest-launch-from-template
State   Running
TemplateCentOS 7 40GB
Dynamically ScalableYes
OS Type CentOS 7
Hypervisor  XenServer
Attached ISO
Compute offering2vCPU,4GB RAM,HA
# of CPU Cores  2
CPU (in MHz)2000
Memory (in MB)  4096
VGPU
HA Enabled  Yes
Group   
Zone name   Rushford
HostFlex-Xen4.flexhost.local
Domain  ROOT
Account admin
Created 22 Jun 2017 08:33:30

I suspected storage a while back and noticed that the SSVM was recreating its 
2.5GB disk over and over and over on all of my storage luns.  So after cleaning 
up the 5TB worth of data (last Friday) I don't see a storage issue with my SAN 
iscsi connections.

http://prntscr.com/fmus2i 

Again thanks Dag for your response here's to hoping some of that helps track 
down what's broke.

Whats killing me is the amount of logs.  It seems like its creating multiple 
system vm's at the same time


Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Dag Sonstebo [mailto:dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 6:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's

OK, you seem to have a handful of issues here.

1) You have stated at the start of this thread you are using CloudStack 4.9.0 
and XS6.5. 
In this log dump - https://pastebin.com/2DhzFVDZ - all your downloads are for 
4.5 system VM templates, e.g.

2017-06-21 10:46:16,440 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(Work-Job-Executor-39:ctx-ca13c13b job-1042/job-147411 ctx-ebfa1fb6) Seq 
15-7914231920173516250: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 
15(Flex-Xen3.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid;
…

Your MySQL query confirms this:

- - -  

SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';

1   routing-1   SystemVM Template (XenServer)   
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2  
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241SystemVM Template (XenServer)   0   
0   184 1   0   1   0   XenServer   
0   2689602048  Active  0   0
3   routing-3   SystemVM Template (KVM) 
8a46062a-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2   2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002SystemVM Template (KVM) 0   0   
15  1   0   1   0   KVM 0   
Active  0   0
8   routing-8   SystemVM Template (vSphere) 
8a4e70c6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-vmware.ova   
OVA 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
3106a79a4ce66cd7f6a7c50e93f2db57SystemVM Template (vSphere) 0   
0   15  1   0   1   0   VMware  0   
Active  0   1
9   routing-9   SystemVM Template (HyperV)  
8a5184e6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-hyperv.vhd.zip   
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
70bd30ea02ee9ed67d2c6b85c179cee9SystemVM Template (HyperV)  0   
0  

SAML / Keycloak (RH SSO) Authentification Problem

[Vogel, Sven]

Hi Team, Hi Rohit,

we try to integrate keycloak as our SAML IDP. We use CS 4.9.2.0.


1.   We defined users into LDAP and imported them in keycloak

2.   Created a IDP with keycloak and 
http://:8080/client/api?command=getSPMetadata Metadata Information
Pictures:
https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=3612cd6e2cb0e554c59f=0
https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=076085f3415077012d7c=0

3.   Map keycloak username to uid

Pictures:

https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=ba578d8c2dd2db3ead6f=0

4.   Import User from LDAP and Activate them to the SSO Instance

Picture:

https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=785ee9b0df5ec976f397=0

https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=24428f64858526fd4401=0

5.   We Choose the SAML Provider on the Cloudstack login page and we will 
redirected correctly to the keycloak login page. we put our credentials into 
and redirection back to cloudstack starts.
--After that we get the following error

---snip

531

Failed to find admin configured username attribute in the SAML Response. Please 
ask your administrator to check SAML user attribute name.


---snip


6.   When we look at a browser trace with a saml plugin we see a success.

Picture:

https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=fa038b7c2b2d4c6f1dcd=0

7.   Our SAML Cloudstack Settings / they seems to be okay
Picture:
https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=87fe39bb415461f40154=0


our Web Developer tried it with a Simple SAML PHP Library and there all things 
work with keycloak. We checked there all values and the uid. You will see the 
uid are correctly set. saml2.user.attribute.
Picture
https://mybox.vboxvault.de/invitations?share=c727b8f5dfc678318938=0




Best regards

Sven Vogel
Head of Cloud Solutions

Re: Recreating SystemVM's

[Dag Sonstebo]

OK, you seem to have a handful of issues here.

1) You have stated at the start of this thread you are using CloudStack 4.9.0 
and XS6.5. 
In this log dump - https://pastebin.com/2DhzFVDZ - all your downloads are for 
4.5 system VM templates, e.g.

2017-06-21 10:46:16,440 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(Work-Job-Executor-39:ctx-ca13c13b job-1042/job-147411 ctx-ebfa1fb6) Seq 
15-7914231920173516250: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 
15(Flex-Xen3.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid;
…

Your MySQL query confirms this:

- - -  

SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';

1   routing-1   SystemVM Template (XenServer)   
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2  
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241SystemVM Template (XenServer)   0   
0   184 1   0   1   0   XenServer   
0   2689602048  Active  0   0
3   routing-3   SystemVM Template (KVM) 
8a46062a-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2   2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002SystemVM Template (KVM) 0   0   
15  1   0   1   0   KVM 0   
Active  0   0
8   routing-8   SystemVM Template (vSphere) 
8a4e70c6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-vmware.ova   
OVA 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
3106a79a4ce66cd7f6a7c50e93f2db57SystemVM Template (vSphere) 0   
0   15  1   0   1   0   VMware  0   
Active  0   1
9   routing-9   SystemVM Template (HyperV)  
8a5184e6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-hyperv.vhd.zip   
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1   
70bd30ea02ee9ed67d2c6b85c179cee9SystemVM Template (HyperV)  0   
0   15  1   0   1   0   Hyperv  0   
Active  0   0
10  routing-10  SystemVM Template (LXC) 
5bb9e71c-bb72-11e4-8c76-0050569b16620   0   SYSTEM  0   64  
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2   2015-02-23 09:40:56 1   
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002SystemVM Template (LXC) 0   0   
15  1   0   1   0   LXC 0   
Active  0   0


- - -

In addition you have also stated “I redeployed 
systemcl64template-5.6-xen.vhd.bz2 last week does that not recreated the uuid 
?” 

So the questions here are:
- why are you using 4.5 templates with 4.9? Did you recently upgrade or was 
this put in wrong to start off with?
- what are you trying to do with “systemcl64template-5.6-xen.vhd.bz2”? My guess 
is this is a typo? If you were trying to install the 4.6 template what process 
did you follow?
- following on from this can you do a MySQL query listing the uploaded 
template? Can you also check what the status is of this in your GUI – is it 
uploaded to the zone in question and in a READY state? You can also check this 
in the template_store_ref table.
- what is your global setting for “router.template.xenserver” currently set to?

I get the impression your environment is possibly managing to limp along using 
4.5 system VM templates – if so I’m surprised if anything is working. For 4.9 
you should be using 4.6 templates (e.g. 
http://packages.shapeblue.com.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/systemvmtemplate/4.6/new/systemvm64template-4.6-xen.vhd.bz2
 ) - although I think maybe this is what you are trying to achieve?

2) VM i-153-446 – as you can see from the logs there’s not a log to go by: 
"Unable to start i-153-446-VM due to ". However – you haven’t told us if this 
is a new VM or existing? If it’s new it won’t necessarily be able to start 
until you have the SSVM sorted in your Rushford zone. For further 
troubleshooting you should also check the logs on the XS host where this VM was 
trying to start. 

3) Your issues could be storage related – do all SRs (like FlexSAN2-LUN0)  show 
as connected to your XS hosts in XenCenter? If not can you repair them from 
XenCenter?

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect

Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Vijay,

Not a fix but my twopence worth - we came across a similar issue recently – our 
finding was the SSL handshaking between management server and Netscaler failed 
due to certificate error in connection with 512bit vs 2048bit certs in use on 
the Netscaler side.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

From: Vijay Sachdeva 
Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:58
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

Hey anyone who can revert me on this, please..!!

Thanks

Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation

PastedGraphic-1.tiff
A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On 21-Jun-2017, at 6:08 PM, Vijay Sachdeva 
> wrote:

Dear Team,

I am trying to integrate Citrix Netscaler with Cloudstack 4.9, getting 
following error while adding:-

"Failed to log in to Netscaler device at 192.168.3.159 due to Received fatal 
alert: handshake_failure"


While adding Netscaler device it asks for Public interface and Private 
Interface, need to understand what’s that in Netscaler?  Is it like adding two 
more virtual interfaces to Netscalaer device?


Right now there is only one management IP on it, do I need to add two more 
interfaces?




Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation


A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com

Re: Citrix Netscalar Integration with Cloudstack

[Vijay Sachdeva]

Hey anyone who can revert me on this, please..!!

Thanks

Vijay Sachdeva
Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation


A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019 
24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
www.indiqus.com 

> On 21-Jun-2017, at 6:08 PM, Vijay Sachdeva  wrote:
> 
> Dear Team,
> 
> I am trying to integrate Citrix Netscaler with Cloudstack 4.9, getting 
> following error while adding:-
> 
> "Failed to log in to Netscaler device at 192.168.3.159 due to Received fatal 
> alert: handshake_failure"
> 
> 
> While adding Netscaler device it asks for Public interface and Private 
> Interface, need to understand what’s that in Netscaler?  Is it like adding 
> two more virtual interfaces to Netscalaer device? 
> 
> 
> Right now there is only one management IP on it, do I need to add two more 
> interfaces?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vijay Sachdeva
> Consultant - Cloud & Virtualisation
> 
> 
> A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019 
> 24x7 011-40551409 | M +918826699409
> www.indiqus.com  
>