Re: Dynamic roles question

Hi Ivan, This would be a good improvement. Instead of changing the rules for the account role based on the requirements or on demand, account can be mapped to a new role (manually or automatic after trial) of the same role type [User]. Do you have any use case for changing account role for Admin

Re: Dynamic roles question

Yep, something like that is the key. Add an optional parameter to updateAccount. чт, 17 мая 2018 г., 20:56 Rafael Weingärtner : > That seems a nice enhancement. > > Are you thinking about adding an extra parameter to "updateAccount"? > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03

CloudStack Uasge lists expunged Volumes. Is that correct?

Hi all, I am just starting to have a first look on CloudStack Usage Service in 4.11. Maybe I am getting something wrong, but to me it seems, that Usage reports lists destroyed and expunged Volumes. Is that the intended behaviour? For an example project it lists the following records:

Re: Dynamic roles question

That seems a nice enhancement. Are you thinking about adding an extra parameter to "updateAccount"? On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, community. > > I'm thinking about implementing the feature for accounts which permits to > change

Dynamic roles question

Hello, community. I'm thinking about implementing the feature for accounts which permits to change account role. Basically, the rationale is trials or demonstration modes which restricts users from doing extra stuff, like VM creation, service offering changes, etc. Basically, after trial the