Hello,
as this is my first post to the list, I would like to thank all
contributors for Cloudstack which I use since last fall without any
problems. I run 4.1.1 with KVM and advanced networking.
After a restart of the management server (stopping and starting the java
process), the virtual domain
ist of networks refs that somehow weren¹t cleaned
> during the nic detach. Remove the entry returned from router_network_ref
> table.
>
> Let me know how it works.
>
> -Alena.
>
>
> On 3/21/14, 3:36 PM, "Kambiz Darabi" wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>&
how to clean it up
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 3/22/14, 5:41 AM, "Kambiz Darabi" wrote:
>
>>Hi Alena,
>>
>>thank you for your help.
>>
>>The query returns no rows, i.e. nics.removed was not null, but I removed
>>the row though to see what happens: a
the reference:
>
> Update user_ip_address set one_to_one_nat=0, instance_id=null where
> id=
>
>
>
> Let me know how it works.
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 3/24/14, 10:55 AM, "Kambiz Darabi" wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I hope I have und
hat fails, happening to link local 169.x
> eth0 interface.
>
> Edison, can you please tell us how to debug link local connection failure,
> on KVM agent?
>
> Thank you,
> Alena.
>
> On 3/24/14, 1:47 PM, "Kambiz Darabi" wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>
> Kambiz, the debug statements below are for the case when eth1 is a control
> interface as it was in your old command. I’ve looked at the new command,
> eth1 is not control, its either public or guest
>
> eth0: - control
>
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 169.254.1.59
>
>
>
> I can see that only one parameter is missing from the start command, the
> second nic (network id=205) doesn’t have the gateway.
> From the command/DB, I see that the gateway is missing in the nics table
> for the network 205? Can you check gateway information in the networks
"networkRateMbps":-1,
"defaultNic":false,
"uuid":"cabd4cd9-c39f-423f-ad6a-ee3affe0bd9d",
"ip":"169.254.1.242",
"netmask":"255.255.0.0",
"gateway&
e to new CS version? Or does it fail for any specific network?
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 3/25/14, 2:11 PM, "Kambiz Darabi" wrote:
>
>>I updated nics.gateway for that network, but the VM still shows the same
>>behaviour.
>>
>>If one compares interfaces:
>&
Hi Lisa,
Erik Weber wrote:
>
> One way is to let puppet or whatever decide based on hostname, and pass the
> role that way. Or you could look at userdata, but that is hard to change
> later.
>
> Erik
> 26. mars 2014 18:47 skrev "X. S." følgende:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> I have several choices to make re
10 matches
Mail list logo