[mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 1:48 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1
Hi Martin,
The public interface is supposed to be DOWN on the backup. Don’t ask me why
this is designed l
31.255 scope global eth2
>
>So there's something going on with eth2, both are up, and also have the same
>MAC address. The keepalived configurations seems to deal only with eth0.
>
>Thanks
>
>Martin
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schu
also have the same
MAC address. The keepalived configurations seems to deal only with eth0.
Thanks
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2016 18:27
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Packet loss o
uot;Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 16:05:02
>> Subject: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Thanks for the hint! On my test isolated net
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 16:05:02
> Subject: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for the hint! On
works.
Thanks again,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2016 16:18
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1
Can you check nex time this happens if the VRs don't have both the
n Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 14:00:38
> Subject: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1
> Hello!
>
> I just upgraded from 4.4.4 to 4.7.1, and upgraded the virtual routers to
&g
Hello!
I just upgraded from 4.4.4 to 4.7.1, and upgraded the virtual routers to 4.6.0.
Since then, we have some packet loss with redundant virtual routers. If I shut
down one of the routers (leaving the other one running), the problem disappears.
I often see messages like "Redundant Virtual