RE: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-13 Thread Suresh Sadhu
[mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 1:48 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 Hi Martin, The public interface is supposed to be DOWN on the backup. Don’t ask me why this is designed l

Re: AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-11 Thread Remi Bergsma
31.255 scope global eth2 > >So there's something going on with eth2, both are up, and also have the same >MAC address. The keepalived configurations seems to deal only with eth0. > >Thanks > >Martin > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schu

AW: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-11 Thread Martin Emrich
also have the same MAC address. The keepalived configurations seems to deal only with eth0. Thanks Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2016 18:27 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Packet loss o

Re: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-07 Thread Remi Bergsma
uot;Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 16:05:02 >> Subject: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 > >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for the hint! On my test isolated net

Re: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-07 Thread Nux!
- Original Message - > From: "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 16:05:02 > Subject: AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 > Hi! > > Thanks for the hint! On

AW: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-07 Thread Martin Emrich
works. Thanks again, Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2016 16:18 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 Can you check nex time this happens if the VRs don't have both the

Re: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-07 Thread Nux!
n Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 7 March, 2016 14:00:38 > Subject: Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1 > Hello! > > I just upgraded from 4.4.4 to 4.7.1, and upgraded the virtual routers to &g

Packet loss on redundant virtual router since <=4.7.1

2016-03-07 Thread Martin Emrich
Hello! I just upgraded from 4.4.4 to 4.7.1, and upgraded the virtual routers to 4.6.0. Since then, we have some packet loss with redundant virtual routers. If I shut down one of the routers (leaving the other one running), the problem disappears. I often see messages like "Redundant Virtual