What is the issue with vrrp exactly?
On 2023-11-09 18:59, Alex Mattioli wrote:
Does this PR fix the issues with VRRP?
-Original Message-
From: gabriel.fernan...@scclouds.com.br
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 3:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Redundant router
Does this PR fix the issues with VRRP?
-Original Message-
From: gabriel.fernan...@scclouds.com.br
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 3:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Redundant router - Isolated Network
Hello Cristian,
This feature was removed from the UI due
Hello Cristian,
This feature was removed from the UI due to complaints made by some
operators. However, we have an ongoing discussion in this Pull Request:
(https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7405) where we are
considering ways to reimplement this feature without the aforementioned
issues.
Christian,
this option has been purposefully removed because it was used accidentally
too often. To create a network as redundant you need to select the
appropriate network_offering for it.
see these APIs:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/apis/createNetwork.html
est Regards,
> Sanjeev N
> Chief Product Engineer, Accelerite
> Off: +91 40 6722 9368 | EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 5:05 AM
> To: users
: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 5:05 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Redundant Router
Hi, it looks like RVR requires Source NAT according to the admin guide:
Redundant router capability: Available only when Virtual Router is selected
Hi, it looks like RVR requires Source NAT according to the admin guide:
Redundant router capability: Available only when Virtual Router is selected as
the Source NAT provider.
kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HS
@shapeblue
