On 15/03/16 02:12 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm referring here to an ancient LKML thread introducing DLM. In
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/299788 David Teigland
> states:
>
> GFS requires that a failed node be fenced prior to gfs being told to
> begin recovery
So I switched the resource to use the following:
When I do a failover from the master to slave. It seems to add a route of
0.0.0.0/0 but still fails to start the p_src_eth0DEF resource with the same
error.
> stderr: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> stderr: ERROR: p_src_eth0DEF Failed to
Hi,
I'm referring here to an ancient LKML thread introducing DLM. In
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/299788 David Teigland
states:
GFS requires that a failed node be fenced prior to gfs being told to
begin recovery for that node
which sounds very plausible as according to
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll take a look at how this differs. :)
-Original Message-
I'm not very familiar with NFS in a cluster, but there is an
ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource agent in the resource-agents package.
OCF agents are generally preferable to lsb/systemd because they
On 03/14/2016 12:47 PM, Todd Hebert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on setting up a test-system that can handle NFS failover.
>
> The base is CentOS 7.
> I'm using ZVOL block devices out of ZFS to back DRBD replicated volumes.
>
> I have four DRBD resources (r0, r1, r2, r3, which are /dev/drbd1
Hi,
I'm trying to get fence_scsi working, but i get "no such device" error.
It's a two node cluster with nodes called "node01" and "node03". The OS
is RHEL 7.2.
here is some relevant info:
# pcs status
Cluster name: testrhel7cluster
Last updated: Tue Mar 15 15:05:40 2016 Last
