On 15/11/16 04:25 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
> If a Linux server with bonded interfaces attached to different switches is
> rebooted, is it possible that a bridge loop could result for a brief period?
> We noticed that one of our 100 Linux servers became unresponsive and appears
> to have rebooted
16.11.2016 02:48, Eric Robinson пишет:
> mode 1. No special switch configuration. spanning tree not enabled. I
> have 100+ Linux servers, all of which use bonding. The network has
> been stable for 10 years. No changes recently. However, this is the
> second time that we have seen high latency and
It's been a little while for me, but going by
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt it looks as
if the driver sends one or more gratuitous ARPs out the active interface on
state changes, which could be close to the root of the problem depending on
how the switches are depl
mode 1. No special switch configuration. spanning tree not enabled. I have 100+
Linux servers, all of which use bonding. The network has been stable for 10
years. No changes recently. However, this is the second time that we have seen
high latency and traced it down to the behavior of one partic
What bonding mode are you using? Some modes require additional
configuration from the switch to avoid flooding. Also, is spanning tree
enabled on the switches?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM Eric Robinson
wrote:
> If a Linux server with bonded interfaces attached to different switches is
> rebo
If a Linux server with bonded interfaces attached to different switches is
rebooted, is it possible that a bridge loop could result for a brief period? We
noticed that one of our 100 Linux servers became unresponsive and appears to
have rebooted. (The cause has not been determined.) A couple of