Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync IPC unix socket path

Rytis, Hi, We are using corosync (currently v2.3.5) for group communication services, and we would like to package it to separate container (all the service-per-container stuff), thus requiring to forward IPC. Is it possible to set unix socket path for corosync IPC? Sadly nope. Corosync is

[ClusterLabs] Corosync IPC unix socket path

Hi, We are using corosync (currently v2.3.5) for group communication services, and we would like to package it to separate container (all the service-per-container stuff), thus requiring to forward IPC. Is it possible to set unix socket path for corosync IPC? Thanks in advance. Best Regards,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Using "mandatory" startup order but avoiding depending clones from restart after member of parent clone fails

Any help ? thoughts ? On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Alejandro Comisario wrote: > guys, really happy to post my first doubt. > > i'm kinda having an "conceptual" issue that's bringing me, lots of issues > i need to ensure that order of starting resources are mandatory