Hi All,
First of all, let me thank everyone here for providing excellent support
from the time I started evaluating this tool about a year ago. It has
helped me to make a timely and good quality release of our Redundancy
solution using Pacemaker & Corosync. (Three cheers :))
Now for our next rele
On 03/21/2017 11:20 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem when creating rules with many expressions:
>
>
> boolean-op="and">
>id="on_nodes_dbx_first_head-expr" value="Active"/>
>id="on_nodes_dbx_first_head-expr" value="AH"/>
>
>
Hi,
I have a problem when creating rules with many expressions:
Result:
Call cib_replace failed (-203): Update does not conform to the configured
schema
Everything works when I remove "boolean-op" attribute and leave only one
expression.
What
On 20/03/17 12:22 PM, Alexander Markov wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> it looks like I miss something obvious, but I just don't get what has
> happened.
>
> I've got a number of stonith-enabled clusters within my big POWER boxes.
> My stonith devices are two HMC (hardware management consoles) - separate
Hello guys,
it looks like I miss something obvious, but I just don't get what has
happened.
I've got a number of stonith-enabled clusters within my big POWER boxes.
My stonith devices are two HMC (hardware management consoles) - separate
servers from IBM that can reboot separate LPARs (logic
Hello guys,
it looks like I miss something obvious, but I just don't get what has
happened.
I've got a number of stonith-enabled clusters within my big POWER boxes.
My stonith devices are two HMC (hardware management consoles) - separate
servers from IBM that can reboot separate LPARs (logic
