Re: [ClusterLabs] Notifications on changes in clustered LVM

2017-06-23 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 20/06/17 10:59 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Digimer writes: > >> On 19/06/17 11:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >>> udev events are sent over netlink, not D-Bus. >> >> I've not used that before. Any docs on how to listen for those events, >> by chance? If nothing off hand,

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 06/23/2017 11:52 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > >> People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far >> too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks >> continually disproved ad nauseam. > > Has anyone had a network card

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far > too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks > continually disproved ad nauseam. Has anyone had a network card fail recently and what does that look like on modern

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 23/06/17 08:48 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote: >> I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an >> vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the >> management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an > vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the > management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still have > connectivity to public or