[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

2018-04-10 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 09.04.2018 um 19:10 in >>> Nachricht <1523293841.5734.7.ca...@redhat.com>: > Based on the list discussion and feedback I could coax out of others, I > will change the Pacemaker daemon names, including the log tags, for > 2.0.0-rc3. > > I will add symlinks for the old n

[ClusterLabs] Could we use pacemaker configure two master/slave resources?

2018-04-10 Thread 范国腾
Hello, We use the following cluster now. the postgres resource agent PAF has its own mechanism to decide which node should be promoted to master. But the performance test show the disk IO is the bottleneck. So we want to try to change the GFS2 resource（clusterf） to be master/slave mode too

[ClusterLabs] Pacemake/Corosync good fit for embedded product?

2018-04-10 Thread David Hunt
Hi, We are planning on creating a HA product in an active/standby configuration whereby the standby unit needs to take over from the active unit very fast (<50ms including all services restored). We are able to do very fast signaling (say 1000Hz) between the two units to detect failures so detect

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

2018-04-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > > > > On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > Based on the list discussion and feedback I cou

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

2018-04-10 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:08:55 +0200 Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 10/04/18 09:42 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > >> Jan Pokorný wrote: > >>> On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

2018-04-10 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 10/04/18 09:42 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 >> Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: I won't change the systemd unit file names or API library names, >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] STONITH forever?

2018-04-10 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 07:26 +, Stefan Schlösser wrote: > Hi, >   > I have a 3 node setup on ubuntu 16.04. Corosync/Pacemaker services > are not started automatically. >   > If I put all 3 nodes to offline mode, with 1 node in an „unclean“ > state I get a never ending STONITH. >   > What happens

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

2018-04-10 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > > On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > Based on the list discussion and feedback I could coax out of > > > others, I > > > will change the Pacemaker dae

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to cancel a fencing request?

2018-04-10 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:24:04 +0200 Klaus Wenninger wrote: > On 04/10/2018 08:48 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:59:26 -0500 > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 00:02 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > >>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:35:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's additional services for distributed applications (Was: Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons)

2018-04-10 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 04/10/2018 11:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 06/04/18 12:24 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 06/04/18 09:09 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > The idea is to provide a more generalized key-value store that > other applications built on top of pacemaker can use. Something > like a HTT

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's additional services for distributed applications (Was: Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons)

2018-04-10 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 06/04/18 12:24 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 06/04/18 09:09 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: The idea is to provide a more generalized key-value store that other applications built on top of pacemaker can use. Something like a HTTP REST API to a key-value store with transactiona

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to cancel a fencing request?

2018-04-10 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 04/10/2018 08:48 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:59:26 -0500 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > >> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 00:02 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:35:43 -0500 >>> Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 21:46 +02

[ClusterLabs] pcs 0.9.164 released

2018-04-10 Thread Tomas Jelinek
I am happy to announce the latest release of pcs, version 0.9.164. Source code is available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.9.164.tar.gz or https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.9.164.zip This is a security release fixing 3 CVEs, one of them is rated as Important and two

[ClusterLabs] STONITH forever?

2018-04-10 Thread Stefan Schlösser
Hi, I have a 3 node setup on ubuntu 16.04. Corosync/Pacemaker services are not started automatically. If I put all 3 nodes to offline mode, with 1 node in an "unclean" state I get a never ending STONITH. What happens is that the STONITH causes a reboot of the unclean node. 1) I would have tho