>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 29.08.2018 um 20:30 in
Nachricht
<1535567455.5594.5.ca...@redhat.com>:
> On Wed, 2018‑08‑29 at 13:30 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Reading the docs I have a question: WHen I run a clone with
>> interleave=false in a three‑node cluster, and the clne cannot be
>
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 13:30 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Reading the docs I have a question: WHen I run a clone with
> interleave=false in a three-node cluster, and the clne cannot be
> started on one node, will ordering for such a clone be possible? Does
> it make a difference, whether th
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 18:40 +0100, Ian Underhill wrote:
> im guessing this is just a "feature", but something that will
> probably stop me using groups
>
> Scenario1 (working):
> 1) Two nodes (1,2) within a cluster (default-stickiness = INFINITY)
> 2) Two resources (A,B) in a cluster running on di
im guessing this is just a "feature", but something that will probably stop
me using groups
Scenario1 (working):
1) Two nodes (1,2) within a cluster (default-stickiness = INFINITY)
2) Two resources (A,B) in a cluster running on different nodes
3) colocation constraint between resources of A->B sco
Hi!
Reading the docs I have a question: WHen I run a clone with interleave=false in
a three-node cluster, and the clne cannot be started on one node, will ordering
for such a clone be possible? Does it make a difference, whether the resource
cannot run on an online node, or is unable due to a s
