Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-15 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
16.03.2019 1:16, Adam Budziński пишет: > Hi Tomas, > > Ok but how then pacemaker or the fence agent knows which route to take to > reach the vCenter? They do not know or care at all. It is up to your underlying operating system and its routing tables. > Btw. Do I have to add the stonith

Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-15 Thread Tomas Jelinek
Dne 15. 03. 19 v 15:09 Adam Budziński napsal(a): Hello Tomas, Thank you! So far I  need to say how great this community is, would never expect so much positive vibes! A big thank you your doing a great job! Now let's talk business :) So if pcsd is using ring0 and it fails will ring1 not be

Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-15 Thread Tomas Jelinek
Dne 15. 03. 19 v 12:32 Adam Budziński napsal(a): Hello Folks, __ __ Tow node active/passive VMware VM cluster. __ __ /etc/hosts __ __ 10.116.63.83    srv1 10.116.63.84    srv2 172.16.21.12    srv2cr1 172.16.22.12    srv2cr2 172.16.21.11    srv1cr1

[ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-15 Thread Adam Budziński
Hello Folks, Tow node active/passive VMware VM cluster. /etc/hosts 10.116.63.83srv1 10.116.63.84srv2 172.16.21.12srv2cr1 172.16.22.12srv2cr2 172.16.21.11srv1cr1 172.16.22.11srv1cr2 I have 3 NIC’s on each VM: 10.116.63.83srv1 and 10.116.63.84

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync rrp or bonding

2019-03-15 Thread Jan Friesse
Adam Thank you very much.I really appreciate your help! These are 2 virtual machines ESXi do you see any possible hardware limitations ? (Don't know much about VMware). I don't know much about VMware ether. The only limitation of bonding is switch (evento some bonding modes don't need hw