Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-19 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 21:49 +0100, Adam Budziński wrote: > Not sure I got “or (due to two_node / wait_for_all in corosync.conf) > waits until it can see the other node before doing anything” right. I > mean according tohttps://access.redhat.com/solutions/1295713“Th > e 'two_node' parameter sets

Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-19 Thread Adam Budziński
Not sure I got “or (due to two_node / wait_for_all in corosync.conf) waits until it can see the other node before doing anything” right. I mean according tohttps://access.redhat.com/solutions/1295713 “The 'two_node' parameter sets the quorum to '1' and allows one node to remain quorate and

Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-19 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 15:55 +0100, Adam Budziński wrote: > Hello Ken, > > Thank you. > > But if I have a two node cluster and a working fencing mechanism > wouldn't it be enough to disable the corosync and pacemaker service > on both nodes so when it fence they won't come up? There's actually

Re: [ClusterLabs] Interface confusion

2019-03-19 Thread Adam Budziński
Hello Ken, Thank you. But if I have a two node cluster and a working fencing mechanism wouldn't it be enough to disable the corosync and pacemaker service on both nodes so when it fence they won't come up? Thank you pon., 18.03.2019, 16:19 użytkownik Ken Gaillot napisał: > On Sat, 2019-03-16