[ClusterLabs] kronosnet v1.8 released

2019-03-26 Thread Fabio M. Di Nitto
All, We are pleased to announce the general availability of kronosnet v1.8 kronosnet (or knet for short) is the new underlying network protocol for Linux HA components (corosync), that features ability to use multiple links between nodes, active/active and active/passive link failover

Re: [ClusterLabs] Why do clusters have a name?

2019-03-26 Thread Digimer
On 2019-03-26 4:12 p.m., Brian Reichert wrote: > This will sound like a dumb question: > > The manpage for pcs(8) implies that to set up a cluster, one needs > to provide a name. > > Why do clusters have names? > > Is there a use case wherein there would be multiple clusters visible > in an

[ClusterLabs] Why do clusters have a name?

2019-03-26 Thread Brian Reichert
This will sound like a dumb question: The manpage for pcs(8) implies that to set up a cluster, one needs to provide a name. Why do clusters have names? Is there a use case wherein there would be multiple clusters visible in an administrative UI, such that they'd need to be differentiated? --

Re: [ClusterLabs] Unable to restart resources

2019-03-26 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 09:33 -0600, JCA wrote: > Making some progress with Pacemaker/DRBD, but still trying to grasp > some of the basics of this framework. Here is my current situation: > > I have a two-node cluster, pmk1 and pmk2, with resources ClusterIP > and DrbdFS. In what follows, commands

Re: [ClusterLabs] Colocation constraint moving resource

2019-03-26 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 22:12 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 26.03.2019 17:14, Ken Gaillot пишет: > > On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Singleton wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > > > I am encountering an issue with colocation constraints. > > > > > > I have created a 4 nodes cluster (3

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Apache graceful restart not supported by heartbeat apache control script

2019-03-26 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:36 -0700, Cole Miller wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you very much Andrei, Ken and Ulrich for your input! > > I should have mentioned that I did start with trying apachectl > graceful, but it fails to find the process because the httpd process > is not being run via systemd.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Colocation constraint moving resource

2019-03-26 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
26.03.2019 17:14, Ken Gaillot пишет: > On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Singleton wrote: >> Dear all >> >> I am encountering an issue with colocation constraints. >> >> I have created a 4 nodes cluster (3 "main" and 1 "spare") with 3 >> resources and I wish to have each resource run only

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Apache graceful restart not supported by heartbeat apache control script

2019-03-26 Thread Cole Miller
Hi, Thank you very much Andrei, Ken and Ulrich for your input! I should have mentioned that I did start with trying apachectl graceful, but it fails to find the process because the httpd process is not being run via systemd. The explanation of why this capability is not present in the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Unable to restart resources

2019-03-26 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
26.03.2019 18:33, JCA пишет: > Making some progress with Pacemaker/DRBD, but still trying to grasp some of > the basics of this framework. Here is my current situation: > > I have a two-node cluster, pmk1 and pmk2, with resources ClusterIP and > DrbdFS. In what follows, commands preceded by

[ClusterLabs] Unable to restart resources

2019-03-26 Thread JCA
Making some progress with Pacemaker/DRBD, but still trying to grasp some of the basics of this framework. Here is my current situation: I have a two-node cluster, pmk1 and pmk2, with resources ClusterIP and DrbdFS. In what follows, commands preceded by '[pmk1] #' are to be understood as commands

Re: [ClusterLabs] Colocation constraint moving resource

2019-03-26 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Singleton wrote: > Dear all > > I am encountering an issue with colocation constraints. > > I have created a 4 nodes cluster (3 "main" and 1 "spare") with 3 > resources and I wish to have each resource run only on its own node > (or > on the spare) and